From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB84C77B73
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 31 May 2023 17:01:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S229763AbjEaRBc (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 31 May 2023 13:01:32 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40490 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S229542AbjEaRB3 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 31 May 2023 13:01:29 -0400
Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7896135;
        Wed, 31 May 2023 10:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B6B16347E;
        Wed, 31 May 2023 17:01:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84E64C433EF;
        Wed, 31 May 2023 17:01:26 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
        s=k20201202; t=1685552487;
        bh=R7oOfdc1inXuLFb7cvDfmpI9BDI+dIPISRXuyEXNPvI=;
        h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
        b=nzXesSLuaVO21WqMnqz6lZZkzoywNGhofB7+9w1885IbEkRQVdEWM4KHKSlR5VeUh
         M1oBkZNiQGdN1h8nckTf1NxFC3vEjGc6N32U6OdnysH2ezKUhvfU9dHAiWYQUxAxex
         WVTatdhX+KX4UwjwD/vqK4+X7h5HBPNS1RIxDrpnYQ/VJCIj3F/ohGcmWgMCB8Z0ap
         C/rkGpAIcR+Z2RmiacrR6Gpe6lS8JClUDWzQqMfOPfJoTnNVyZ5O6uWArZkmi3n+7K
         qHOB95TfohHPO3YPOggEcTQSlih2+d9rrUypXZhA2qeQ1Bpo+XPuXADSYesRboGN6O
         xrtRBlkZ4pY7Q==
Date:   Wed, 31 May 2023 10:01:25 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
        Pawel Chmielewski <pawel.chmielewski@intel.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
        Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
        Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/topology: add for_each_numa_cpu() macro
Message-ID: <20230531100125.39d73e1d@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZHdrMiVSrPdM3xGn@yury-ThinkPad>
References: <20230430171809.124686-1-yury.norov@gmail.com>
        <ZHdrMiVSrPdM3xGn@yury-ThinkPad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 31 May 2023 08:43:46 -0700 Yury Norov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 10:18:01AM -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> > for_each_cpu() is widely used in kernel, and it's beneficial to create
> > a NUMA-aware version of the macro.
> > 
> > Recently added for_each_numa_hop_mask() works, but switching existing
> > codebase to it is not an easy process.
> > 
> > This series adds for_each_numa_cpu(), which is designed to be similar to
> > the for_each_cpu(). It allows to convert existing code to NUMA-aware as
> > simple as adding a hop iterator variable and passing it inside new macro.
> > for_each_numa_cpu() takes care of the rest.  
> 
> Hi Jakub,
> 
> Now that the series reviewed, can you consider taking it in sched
> tree?

Do you mean someone else or did you mean the net-next tree?