From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Multi-LLC select_idle_sibling()
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 10:09:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230601080914.GQ4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5903fc0a-787e-9471-0256-77ff66f0bdef@bytedance.com>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 11:41:14AM +0800, Abel Wu wrote:
> On 5/31/23 8:04 PM, tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
> >
> > Commit-ID: c7dfd6b9122d29d0e9a4587ab470c0564d7f92ab
> > Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/c7dfd6b9122d29d0e9a4587ab470c0564d7f92ab
> > Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > AuthorDate: Tue, 30 May 2023 13:20:46 +02:00
> > Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > CommitterDate: Tue, 30 May 2023 22:46:27 +02:00
> >
> > sched/fair: Multi-LLC select_idle_sibling()
> >
> > Tejun reported that when he targets workqueues towards a specific LLC
> > on his Zen2 machine with 3 cores / LLC and 4 LLCs in total, he gets
> > significant idle time.
> >
> > This is, of course, because of how select_idle_sibling() will not
> > consider anything outside of the local LLC, and since all these tasks
> > are short running the periodic idle load balancer is ineffective.
> >
> > And while it is good to keep work cache local, it is better to not
> > have significant idle time. Therefore, have select_idle_sibling() try
> > other LLCs inside the same node when the local one comes up empty.
> >
> > Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > kernel/sched/features.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 48b6f0c..0172458 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -7028,6 +7028,38 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
> > }
> > /*
> > + * For the multiple-LLC per node case, make sure to try the other LLC's if the
> > + * local LLC comes up empty.
> > + */
> > +static int
> > +select_idle_node(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
> > +{
> > + struct sched_domain *parent = sd->parent;
> > + struct sched_group *sg;
> > +
> > + /* Make sure to not cross nodes. */
> > + if (!parent || parent->flags & SD_NUMA)
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + sg = parent->groups;
> > + do {
> > + int cpu = cpumask_first(sched_group_span(sg));
> > + struct sched_domain *sd_child;
> > +
> > + sd_child = per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu);
> > + if (sd_child != sd) {
>
> Since sd_llc is cpu private, I think it should be:
>
> if (!cpus_share_cache(cpu, target))
Hmm, yes.. either that or ensure sd is from the first cpu in it's mask.
Let me go fix that.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20230605152531eucas1p2a10401ec2180696cc9a5f2e94a67adca@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2023-05-31 12:04 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Multi-LLC select_idle_sibling() tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 3:41 ` Abel Wu
2023-06-01 8:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-06-01 9:33 ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-06-01 11:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 12:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 14:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 15:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-02 5:13 ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-06-02 6:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-02 9:19 ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-06-07 18:32 ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-06-13 8:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-13 10:30 ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-06-14 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-14 14:58 ` Chen Yu
2023-06-14 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-21 7:16 ` Chen Yu
2023-06-16 6:34 ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-07-05 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-08 13:17 ` Chen Yu
2023-07-12 17:19 ` Chen Yu
2023-07-13 3:43 ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-07-17 1:09 ` Chen Yu
2023-06-02 7:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-02 5:17 ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-06-02 9:06 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2023-06-02 11:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 16:44 ` Chen Yu
2023-06-02 3:12 ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-06-05 15:25 ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-06-05 17:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-05 19:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-05 22:20 ` Marek Szyprowski
2023-06-06 7:58 ` Chen Yu
2023-06-01 8:43 tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230601080914.GQ4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox