linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, chao.gao@intel.com,
	kai.huang@intel.com, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM,
	robert.hu@linux.intel.com, binbin.wu@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v9 1/6] KVM: x86: Consolidate flags for __linearize()
Date: Tue,  6 Jun 2023 17:18:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230606091842.13123-2-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230606091842.13123-1-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>

Consolidate two bool parameters (write/fetch) of __linearize() into a
'u32 flags' parameter to make the function be more concise and future
extendable, i.e. to support Intel Linear Address Masking (LAM), which
allows high non-address bits of linear address to be used as metadata.

Define two flags to replace the two bools.  A new flag will be added to
to support LAM to skip masking off metadata bits of linear address
under some conditions.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c     | 19 ++++++++++---------
 arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h |  4 ++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 936a397a08cd..e89afc39e56f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -687,8 +687,8 @@ static unsigned insn_alignment(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned size)
 static __always_inline int __linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 				       struct segmented_address addr,
 				       unsigned *max_size, unsigned size,
-				       bool write, bool fetch,
-				       enum x86emul_mode mode, ulong *linear)
+				       enum x86emul_mode mode, ulong *linear,
+				       u32 flags)
 {
 	struct desc_struct desc;
 	bool usable;
@@ -718,10 +718,10 @@ static __always_inline int __linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 			goto bad;
 		/* code segment in protected mode or read-only data segment */
 		if ((((ctxt->mode != X86EMUL_MODE_REAL) && (desc.type & 8))
-					|| !(desc.type & 2)) && write)
+			|| !(desc.type & 2)) && (flags & X86EMUL_F_WRITE))
 			goto bad;
 		/* unreadable code segment */
-		if (!fetch && (desc.type & 8) && !(desc.type & 2))
+		if (!(flags & X86EMUL_F_FETCH) && (desc.type & 8) && !(desc.type & 2))
 			goto bad;
 		lim = desc_limit_scaled(&desc);
 		if (!(desc.type & 8) && (desc.type & 4)) {
@@ -757,8 +757,8 @@ static int linearize(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 		     ulong *linear)
 {
 	unsigned max_size;
-	return __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, size, write, false,
-			   ctxt->mode, linear);
+	return __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, size, ctxt->mode, linear,
+			   write ? X86EMUL_F_WRITE : 0);
 }
 
 static inline int assign_eip(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, ulong dst)
@@ -771,7 +771,8 @@ static inline int assign_eip(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, ulong dst)
 
 	if (ctxt->op_bytes != sizeof(unsigned long))
 		addr.ea = dst & ((1UL << (ctxt->op_bytes << 3)) - 1);
-	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 1, false, true, ctxt->mode, &linear);
+	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 1, ctxt->mode, &linear,
+			 X86EMUL_F_FETCH);
 	if (rc == X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
 		ctxt->_eip = addr.ea;
 	return rc;
@@ -907,8 +908,8 @@ static int __do_insn_fetch_bytes(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int op_size)
 	 * boundary check itself.  Instead, we use max_size to check
 	 * against op_size.
 	 */
-	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 0, false, true, ctxt->mode,
-			 &linear);
+	rc = __linearize(ctxt, addr, &max_size, 0, ctxt->mode, &linear,
+			 X86EMUL_F_FETCH);
 	if (unlikely(rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE))
 		return rc;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
index ab65f3a47dfd..5b9ec610b2cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ struct x86_instruction_info {
 #define X86EMUL_IO_NEEDED       5 /* IO is needed to complete emulation */
 #define X86EMUL_INTERCEPTED     6 /* Intercepted by nested VMCB/VMCS */
 
+/* x86-specific emulation flags */
+#define X86EMUL_F_FETCH			BIT(0)
+#define X86EMUL_F_WRITE			BIT(1)
+
 struct x86_emulate_ops {
 	void (*vm_bugged)(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);
 	/*
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-06  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-06  9:18 [PATCH v9 0/6] Linear Address Masking (LAM) KVM Enabling Binbin Wu
2023-06-06  9:18 ` Binbin Wu [this message]
2023-06-06  9:18 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] KVM: x86: Virtualize CR4.LAM_SUP Binbin Wu
2023-06-07  3:40   ` Huang, Kai
2023-06-07  4:55     ` Binbin Wu
2023-06-07  9:20       ` Huang, Kai
2023-06-06  9:18 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] KVM: x86: Virtualize CR3.LAM_{U48,U57} Binbin Wu
2023-06-27 23:40   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-28  3:05     ` Binbin Wu
2023-06-28 17:40       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-03  7:56         ` Binbin Wu
2023-07-22  1:28           ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-06  9:18 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] KVM: x86: Introduce untag_addr() in kvm_x86_ops Binbin Wu
2023-06-28  0:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-29  6:12     ` Binbin Wu
2023-06-29  6:57       ` Chao Gao
2023-06-29  7:22         ` Binbin Wu
2023-06-29 15:33           ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-29  8:30       ` David Laight
2023-06-29 15:16       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-29 17:26         ` Binbin Wu
2023-06-06  9:18 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] KVM: x86: Untag address when LAM applicable Binbin Wu
2023-06-28  0:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-06  9:18 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] KVM: x86: Expose LAM feature to userspace VMM Binbin Wu
2023-06-07  3:52   ` Huang, Kai
2023-06-16  1:45     ` Binbin Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230606091842.13123-2-binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).