public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org,
	ndesaulniers@google.com, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
	longman@redhat.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
	frederic@kernel.org, quic_neeraju@quicinc.com,
	joel@joelfernandes.org, josh@joshtriplett.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Lock and Pointer guards
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:47:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202306080917.C0B16C8@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wj-BGgTF0YgY+L7_G8Jb0UO38Cd8dwrfMqFMEh93B3D7g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 08:45:53AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So for convenient automatic pointer freeing, you want an interface
> much more akin to
> 
>         struct whatever *ptr __automatic_kfree = kmalloc(...);
> 
> which is much more legible, doesn't have any type mis-use issues, and
> is also just trivially dealt with by a
> 
>   static inline void automatic_kfree_wrapper(void *pp)
>   { void *p = *(void **)pp; if (p) kfree(p); }
>   #define __automatic_kfree \
>         __attribute__((__cleanup__(automatic_kfree_wrapper)))
>   #define no_free_ptr(p) \
>         ({ __auto_type __ptr = (p); (p) = NULL; __ptr; })
> 
> which I just tested generates the sane code even for the "set the ptr
> to NULL and return success" case.
> 
> The above allows you to trivially do things like
> 
>         struct whatever *p __automatic_kfree = kmalloc(..);
> 
>         if (!do_something(p))
>                 return -ENOENT;
> 
>         return no_free_ptr(p);

I am a little worried about how (any version so far of) this API could go
wrong, e.g. if someone uses this and does "return p" instead of "return
no_free_ptr(p)", it'll return a freed pointer. I was hoping we could do
something like this to the end of automatic_kfree_wrapper():

	*(void **)pp = NULL;

i.e. if no_free_ptr() goes missing, "return p" will return NULL, which
is much easier to track down that dealing with later use-after-free bugs,
etc. Unfortunately, the __cleanup ordering is _after_ the compiler stores
the return value...

static inline void cleanup_info(struct info **p)
{
	free(*p);
	*p = NULL; /* this is effectively ignored */
}

struct info *do_something(int f)
{
	struct info *var __attribute__((__cleanup__(cleanup_info))) =
		malloc(1024);

	process(var);

	return var; /* oops, forgot to disable cleanup */
}

compile down to:

do_something:
        pushq   %rbx
        movl    $1024, %edi
        call    malloc
        movq    %rax, %rbx
        movq    %rax, %rdi
        call    process
        movq    %rbx, %rdi
        call    free
        movq    %rbx, %rax	; uses saved copy of malloc return
        popq    %rbx
        ret

The point being, if we can proactively make this hard to shoot ourselves in
the foot, that would be nice. :)

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-08 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-26 20:52 [PATCH v2 0/2] Lock and Pointer guards Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-26 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] locking: Introduce __cleanup__ based guards Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-26 21:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-26 21:54     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-27  8:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-26 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched: Use fancy new guards Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-27 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Lock and Pointer guards Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-05-27 19:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-29 12:09   ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-05-29 19:04     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-29 21:27       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2023-05-30  0:06         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-05-30  9:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-30  9:34     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-05-30 13:58     ` Valentin Schneider
2023-06-06  9:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-06 13:17       ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-06 13:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-06 14:50           ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-06 16:06             ` Kees Cook
2023-06-06 18:08             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-06 23:22               ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-07  9:41                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-08  8:52                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-08  9:04                     ` Greg KH
2023-06-08 15:45                     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-08 16:47                       ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-06-08 16:59                         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-08 17:20                         ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-06-08 18:51                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-08 20:14                             ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-06-09 10:20                               ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-08 20:06                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-09  2:25                         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-09  8:14                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-09 21:18                           ` Kees Cook
2023-06-09  8:27                       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2023-06-06 15:31       ` Kees Cook
2023-06-06 15:45         ` Linus Torvalds
2023-06-06 16:08           ` Kees Cook
2023-06-08 16:25           ` David Laight
2023-05-30  9:26   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202306080917.C0B16C8@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox