Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] mips: dts: ralink: Add support for TP-Link HC220 G5 v1 board

Thomas Bogendoerfer
2023-06-09T09:23:33Z

On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 10:15:58PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> Add device tree and bindings for the TP-Link HC220 G5 v1 wireless AP,
> a consumer product from TP-Link based on MT7621.
>
> Changes since v3:
> - Turns out that adding sub-nodes to the pcie invites more warnings from
> dtbs_check so we're dropping those
> - Running dtbs_check made me realise that I need to re-order the patches
> so that the bindings are introduced first. Hence the major change in v4
> is the re-ordering of patches
> - Renamed the LEDs nodes to match the schema.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Remove WIP nodes for NAND flash that accidentally got included in v2
> - Fix commit message with the actual 5GHz WiFi chip name
> - Remove gmac and mdio nodes from device tree as defaults are sufficient
> - Added sub-nodes under pcie for each of the WiFi chip with appropriate
> compatible string.
> - Collect Acks received for the device tree bindings patch
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Changed compatible for the board to "tplink,hc220-g5-v1"
> - Updated the DSA switch nodes to better reflect actual usage.
> - Disabled the fixed-link in gmac1
> - Added device tree bindings in Documentation/
>
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/20230605150114.601102-1-liviu@dudau.co.uk/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/20230529150833.526084-1-liviu@dudau.co.uk/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/20230509200125.309026-1-liviu@dudau.co.uk/
>
> Liviu Dudau (2):
> dt-bindings: mips: Add bindings for TP-Link HC220 G5 v1 board
> mips: dts: ralink: Add support for TP-Link HC220 G5 v1 board
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/mips/ralink.yaml | 1 +
> arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/Makefile | 3 +-
> .../dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220-g5-v1.dts | 84 +++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621-tplink-hc220-g5-v1.dts
>
> --
> 2.40.1

series applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]