From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
tj@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] selftests/bpf: Add test for new bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 22:50:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230610035053.117605-2-void@manifault.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230610035053.117605-1-void@manifault.com>
A prior patch added a new kfunc called bpf_cpumask_first_and() which
wraps cpumask_first_and(). This patch adds a selftest to validate its
behavior.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c | 1 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h | 2 ++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
index d89191440fb1..756ea8b590b6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ static const char * const cpumask_success_testcases[] = {
"test_set_clear_cpu",
"test_setall_clear_cpu",
"test_first_firstzero_cpu",
+ "test_firstand_nocpu",
"test_test_and_set_clear",
"test_and_or_xor",
"test_intersects_subset",
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h
index 0c5b785a93e4..b3493d5d263e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ void bpf_cpumask_release(struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
struct bpf_cpumask *bpf_cpumask_acquire(struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
u32 bpf_cpumask_first(const struct cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
u32 bpf_cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
+u32 bpf_cpumask_first_and(const struct cpumask *src1,
+ const struct cpumask *src2) __ksym;
void bpf_cpumask_set_cpu(u32 cpu, struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
void bpf_cpumask_clear_cpu(u32 cpu, struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
bool bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(u32 cpu, const struct cpumask *cpumask) __ksym;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
index 602a88b03dbc..fbaf510f4ab5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c
@@ -175,6 +175,38 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_first_firstzero_cpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags
return 0;
}
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_firstand_nocpu, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+ struct bpf_cpumask *mask1, *mask2;
+ u32 first;
+
+ if (!is_test_task())
+ return 0;
+
+ mask1 = create_cpumask();
+ if (!mask1)
+ return 0;
+
+ mask2 = create_cpumask();
+ if (!mask2)
+ goto release_exit;
+
+ bpf_cpumask_set_cpu(0, mask1);
+ bpf_cpumask_set_cpu(1, mask2);
+
+ first = bpf_cpumask_first_and(cast(mask1), cast(mask2));
+ if (first <= 1)
+ err = 3;
+
+release_exit:
+ if (mask1)
+ bpf_cpumask_release(mask1);
+ if (mask2)
+ bpf_cpumask_release(mask2);
+ return 0;
+}
+
SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
int BPF_PROG(test_test_and_set_clear, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
{
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-10 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-10 3:50 [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] bpf: Add bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc David Vernet
2023-06-10 3:50 ` David Vernet [this message]
2023-06-12 15:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] selftests/bpf: Add test for new " Yonghong Song
2023-06-10 3:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] bpf: Replace bpf_cpumask_any* with bpf_cpumask_any_distribute* David Vernet
2023-06-12 15:22 ` Yonghong Song
2023-06-10 3:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: Update bpf_cpumask_any* tests to use bpf_cpumask_any_distribute* David Vernet
2023-06-12 15:22 ` Yonghong Song
2023-06-10 3:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] bpf/docs: Update documentation for new cpumask kfuncs David Vernet
2023-06-12 15:23 ` Yonghong Song
2023-06-12 15:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] bpf: Add bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc Yonghong Song
2023-06-12 22:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230610035053.117605-2-void@manifault.com \
--to=void@manifault.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox