Re: [PATCH v2 for-next] RDMA/core: Get IB width and speed from netdev

Mark Zhang
2023-06-19T09:16:15Z

On 6/19/2023 2:20 PM, Junxian Huang wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/6/12 1:46, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 02:38:33PM +0800, Junxian Huang wrote:
>>> From: Haoyue Xu <xuhaoyue1@hisilicon.com>
>>>
>>> Previously, there was no way to query the number of lanes for a network
>>> card, so the same netdev_speed would result in a fixed pair of width and
>>> speed. As network card specifications become more diverse, such fixed
>>> mode is no longer suitable, so a method is needed to obtain the correct
>>> width and speed based on the number of lanes.
>>
>> I'm sorry but I didn't understand the problem statement. Can you please
>> provide an example of configuration that will give different results
>> before this patch and after?
>>
>
> I'll give examples with 20G and 200G netdevs respectively.
>
> 20G:
> Before this patch, regardless of the actual number of lanes, the width and
> speed displayed in ibv_devinfo would be always fixed:
> active_width: 4X
> active_speed: 5 Gbps
> After this patch, there will be different combinations of width and speed
> according to the number of lanes. For example, for a 20G netdev whose number
> of lanes is 2, the width and speed displayed in ibv_devinfo will be:
> active_width: 2X
> active_speed: 10 Gbps
>
> 200G:
> Before this patch, netdevs with netdev_speed more than 40G cannot get a right
> width and speed in ibv_devinfo. Only the default result would be displayed:
> active_width: 4X
> active_speed: 25 Gbps
> After this patch, taking an example with 4 lanes, the displayed results will be:
> active_width: 4X
> active_speed: 50 Gbps

Can we use ib_query_port() instead of __ethtool_get_link_ksettings()?
width = attr.active_width;
speed = ib_speed_enum_to_int(attr.active_speed) *
ib_width_enum_to_int(attr.active_width);

>>>
>>> This patch retrieves netdev lanes and speed from net_device and
>>> translates them to IB width and speed. Also, add a generic function
>>> to translating netdev speed to IB speed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Haoyue Xu <xuhaoyue1@hisilicon.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luoyouming <luoyouming@huawei.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Junxian Huang <huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
>>> include/rdma/ib_verbs.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
>>> index b99b3cc283b6..35f1b670600a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/verbs.c
>>> @@ -1880,11 +1880,19 @@ int ib_modify_qp_with_udata(struct ib_qp *ib_qp, struct ib_qp_attr *attr,
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_modify_qp_with_udata);
>>>
>>> +static void ib_get_width_and_speed(u32 netdev_speed, u32 lanes,
>>> + u16 *speed, u8 *width)
>>> +{
>>> + *width = ib_int_to_ib_width(lanes);
>>> + *speed = ib_eth_to_ib_speed(netdev_speed / lanes);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> int ib_get_eth_speed(struct ib_device *dev, u32 port_num, u16 *speed, u8 *width)
>>> {
>>> int rc;
>>> u32 netdev_speed;
>>> struct net_device *netdev;
>>> + bool cap_link_lanes_supported;
>>> struct ethtool_link_ksettings lksettings;
>>>
>>> if (rdma_port_get_link_layer(dev, port_num) != IB_LINK_LAYER_ETHERNET)
>>> @@ -1896,16 +1904,23 @@ int ib_get_eth_speed(struct ib_device *dev, u32 port_num, u16 *speed, u8 *width)
>>>
>>> rtnl_lock();
>>> rc = __ethtool_get_link_ksettings(netdev, &lksettings);
>>> + cap_link_lanes_supported = netdev->ethtool_ops->cap_link_lanes_supported;
>>> rtnl_unlock();
>>>
>>> dev_put(netdev);
>>>
>>> if (!rc && lksettings.base.speed != (u32)SPEED_UNKNOWN) {
>>> netdev_speed = lksettings.base.speed;
>>> + if (cap_link_lanes_supported && lksettings.lanes) {
>>
>> According to the documentation cap_link_lanes_supported defines if
>> number of lanes can be supplied by user and I would expect from
>> __ethtool_get_link_ksettings() to get right numbers after it was
>> changed.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
> I'm sorry but I didn't quite understand. Do you mean the critical section of
> rtnl_lock() here should be expanded to make sure getting the right number of
> lanes?
>
> Junxian
>
>>> + ib_get_width_and_speed(netdev_speed, lksettings.lanes,
>>> + speed, width);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> } else {
>>> netdev_speed = SPEED_1000;
>>> - pr_warn("%s speed is unknown, defaulting to %u\n", netdev->name,
>>> - netdev_speed);
>>> + if (rc)
>>> + pr_warn("%s speed is unknown, defaulting to %u\n",
>>> + netdev->name, netdev_speed);
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (netdev_speed <= SPEED_1000) {
>>> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>>> index 1e7774ac808f..7dc926ec7fee 100644
>>> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>>> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>>> @@ -552,6 +552,18 @@ static inline int ib_width_enum_to_int(enum ib_port_width width)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static inline int ib_int_to_ib_width(u32 lanes)
>>> +{
>>> + switch (lanes) {
>>> + case 1: return IB_WIDTH_1X;
>>> + case 2: return IB_WIDTH_2X;
>>> + case 4: return IB_WIDTH_4X;
>>> + case 8: return IB_WIDTH_8X;
>>> + case 12: return IB_WIDTH_12X;
>>> + default: return IB_WIDTH_1X;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> enum ib_port_speed {
>>> IB_SPEED_SDR = 1,
>>> IB_SPEED_DDR = 2,
>>> @@ -563,6 +575,20 @@ enum ib_port_speed {
>>> IB_SPEED_NDR = 128,
>>> };
>>>
>>> +static inline int ib_eth_to_ib_speed(u32 speed)
>>> +{
>>> + switch (speed) {
>>> + case SPEED_2500: return IB_SPEED_SDR;
>>> + case SPEED_5000: return IB_SPEED_DDR;
>>> + case SPEED_10000: return IB_SPEED_FDR10;
>>> + case SPEED_14000: return IB_SPEED_FDR;
>>> + case SPEED_25000: return IB_SPEED_EDR;
>>> + case SPEED_50000: return IB_SPEED_HDR;
>>> + case SPEED_100000: return IB_SPEED_NDR;
>>> + default: return IB_SPEED_SDR;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> enum ib_stat_flag {
>>> IB_STAT_FLAG_OPTIONAL = 1 << 0,
>>> };
>>> --
>>> 2.30.0
>>>