Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the mm tree

Jens Axboe
2023-03-22T23:15:57Z

On 3/22/23 5:13 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
>> + if (unlikely(iov_iter_is_pipe(i))) {
>> + copied = copy_page_to_iter_pipe(page, offset, bytes, i);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>
> This bit would need to be removed from copy_page_to_iter_atomic() as the two
> functions it calls should be removed by the patch in the block tree.

Maybe it'd be better to consolidate rather than split the changes over
two trees?

--
Jens Axboe