From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Xin Li <xin3.li@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
steve.wahl@hpe.com, mike.travis@hpe.com,
dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com, russ.anderson@hpe.com,
dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org, joro@8bytes.org,
suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, will@kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
wei.liu@kernel.org, decui@microsoft.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, acme@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
seanjc@google.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/vector: Replace IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR with a timer callback
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 09:20:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230620072047.GS4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230619231611.2230-3-xin3.li@intel.com>
On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 04:16:10PM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
> +/*
> + * Called with vector_lock held
> + */
Instead of comments like that, I tend to add a lockdep_assert*()
statement to the same effect. Which unlike comment actually validate the
claim and since it's code it tends to not go stale like comments do.
> +static void __vector_cleanup(struct vector_cleanup *cl, bool check_irr)
> {
> struct apic_chip_data *apicd;
> struct hlist_node *tmp;
> + bool rearm = false;
lockdep_assert_held(&vector_lock);
> + hlist_for_each_entry_safe(apicd, tmp, &cl->head, clist) {
> unsigned int irr, vector = apicd->prev_vector;
>
> /*
> * Paranoia: Check if the vector that needs to be cleaned
> + * up is registered at the APICs IRR. That's clearly a
> + * hardware issue if the vector arrived on the old target
> + * _after_ interrupts were disabled above. Keep @apicd
> + * on the list and schedule the timer again to give the CPU
> + * a chance to handle the pending interrupt.
> + *
> + * Do not check IRR when called from lapic_offline(), because
> + * fixup_irqs() was just called to scan IRR for set bits and
> + * forward them to new destination CPUs via IPIs.
> */
> + irr = check_irr ? apic_read(APIC_IRR + (vector / 32 * 0x10)) : 0;
> if (irr & (1U << (vector % 32))) {
> + pr_warn_once("Moved interrupt pending in old target APIC %u\n", apicd->irq);
> + rearm = true;
> continue;
> }
> free_moved_vector(apicd);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Must happen under vector_lock to make the timer_pending() check
> + * in __vector_schedule_cleanup() race free against the rearm here.
> + */
> + if (rearm)
> + mod_timer(&cl->timer, jiffies + 1);
> +}
> +
> +static void vector_cleanup_callback(struct timer_list *tmr)
> +{
> + struct vector_cleanup *cl = container_of(tmr, typeof(*cl), timer);
> +
> + /* Prevent vectors vanishing under us */
> + raw_spin_lock_irq(&vector_lock);
> + __vector_cleanup(cl, true);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irq(&vector_lock);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-20 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-19 23:16 [PATCH 0/3] Do IRQ move cleanup with a timer instead of an IPI Xin Li
2023-06-19 23:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/vector: Rename send_cleanup_vector() to vector_schedule_cleanup() Xin Li
2023-06-20 16:27 ` Steve Wahl
2023-06-20 17:33 ` Li, Xin3
2023-06-19 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/vector: Replace IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR with a timer callback Xin Li
2023-06-20 7:20 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-06-20 7:47 ` Li, Xin3
2023-06-20 8:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-20 17:30 ` Li, Xin3
2023-06-19 23:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] tools: Get rid of IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR from tools Xin Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230620072047.GS4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.travis@hpe.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=russ.anderson@hpe.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=steve.wahl@hpe.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
--cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox