From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@nvidia.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific filters
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:33:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230622093338.0000420f@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230622011141.328029-3-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 18:11:39 -0700
Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
> Generic filters aren't used in all the platforms. Instead, the platforms
> may use different means to filter events. Add support for implementation
> specific filters.
If the specification allows explicitly for non standard ways of controlling filters
it would be good to add a specification reference to this.
Otherwise one question inline.
>
> Reviewed-by: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 8 ++++++--
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> index 0f517152cb4e..fafd734c3218 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,9 @@
>
> static unsigned long arm_cspmu_cpuhp_state;
>
> +static void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u32 filter);
> +
> static struct acpi_apmt_node *arm_cspmu_apmt_node(struct device *dev)
> {
> return *(struct acpi_apmt_node **)dev_get_platdata(dev);
> @@ -426,6 +429,7 @@ static int arm_cspmu_init_impl_ops(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_type);
> CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_filter);
> CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_attr_is_visible);
> + CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, set_ev_filter);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -792,7 +796,7 @@ static inline void arm_cspmu_set_event(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> writel(hwc->config, cspmu->base0 + offset);
> }
>
> -static inline void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> +static void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> struct hw_perf_event *hwc,
> u32 filter)
> {
> @@ -826,7 +830,7 @@ static void arm_cspmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int pmu_flags)
> arm_cspmu_set_cc_filter(cspmu, filter);
> } else {
> arm_cspmu_set_event(cspmu, hwc);
> - arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(cspmu, hwc, filter);
> + cspmu->impl.ops.set_ev_filter(cspmu, hwc, filter);
Optional callback so don't you need either provide a default, or check
it isn't null?
> }
>
> hwc->state = 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> index 83df53d1c132..d6d88c246a23 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops {
> u32 (*event_type)(const struct perf_event *event);
> /* Decode filter value from configs */
> u32 (*event_filter)(const struct perf_event *event);
> + /* Set event filter */
> + void (*set_ev_filter)(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u32 filter);
> /* Hide/show unsupported events */
> umode_t (*event_attr_is_visible)(struct kobject *kobj,
> struct attribute *attr, int unused);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-22 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-22 1:11 [PATCH 0/4] perf: ampere: Add support for Ampere SoC PMUs Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-22 1:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Split 64-bit write to 32-bit writes Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-22 10:17 ` Besar Wicaksono
2023-06-22 1:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific filters Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-22 8:33 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-06-22 10:14 ` Besar Wicaksono
2023-06-22 23:23 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-22 1:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific validation Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-22 8:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 1:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: arm_cspmu: ampere_cspmu: Add support for Ampere SoC PMU Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-22 8:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 23:21 ` Ilkka Koskinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230622093338.0000420f@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bwicaksono@nvidia.com \
--cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox