public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@nvidia.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific validation
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 09:34:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230622093450.00004ede@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230622011141.328029-4-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 18:11:40 -0700
Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:

> Some platforms may use e.g. different filtering mechanism and, thus,
> may need different way to validate the events and group.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
FWIW given it's so simple...
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
>  drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 8 +++++++-
>  drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 3 +++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> index fafd734c3218..471d6d7ac81a 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> @@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static void arm_cspmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
>  static int arm_cspmu_get_event_idx(struct arm_cspmu_hw_events *hw_events,
>  				struct perf_event *event)
>  {
> -	int idx;
> +	int idx, ret;
>  	struct arm_cspmu *cspmu = to_arm_cspmu(event->pmu);
>  
>  	if (supports_cycle_counter(cspmu)) {
> @@ -587,6 +587,12 @@ static int arm_cspmu_get_event_idx(struct arm_cspmu_hw_events *hw_events,
>  	if (idx >= cspmu->num_logical_ctrs)
>  		return -EAGAIN;
>  
> +	if (cspmu->impl.ops.validate_event) {
> +		ret = cspmu->impl.ops.validate_event(cspmu, event);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	set_bit(idx, hw_events->used_ctrs);
>  
>  	return idx;
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> index d6d88c246a23..5070d34c2285 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> @@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops {
>  	/* Set event filter */
>  	void (*set_ev_filter)(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
>  			      struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u32 filter);
> +	/* Implementation specific event validation */
> +	int (*validate_event)(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> +			      struct perf_event *event);
>  	/* Hide/show unsupported events */
>  	umode_t (*event_attr_is_visible)(struct kobject *kobj,
>  					 struct attribute *attr, int unused);


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-22  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-22  1:11 [PATCH 0/4] perf: ampere: Add support for Ampere SoC PMUs Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-22  1:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Split 64-bit write to 32-bit writes Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-22 10:17   ` Besar Wicaksono
2023-06-22  1:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific filters Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-22  8:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 10:14     ` Besar Wicaksono
2023-06-22 23:23       ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-22  1:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific validation Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-22  8:34   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2023-06-22  1:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: arm_cspmu: ampere_cspmu: Add support for Ampere SoC PMU Ilkka Koskinen
2023-06-22  8:51   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 23:21     ` Ilkka Koskinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230622093450.00004ede@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=bwicaksono@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox