public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Robin Jarry <rjarry@redhat.com>,
	Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] intel_idle: Sync up the SPEC_CTRL MSR value to x86_spec_ctrl_current
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 11:38:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230622093828.GE4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230622054633.ulrurzzvzjijvdhn@treble>

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:46:33PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 08:36:02PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > When intel_idle_ibrs() is called, it modifies the SPEC_CTRL MSR to
> > 0 in order disable IBRS. However, the new MSR value isn't reflected
> > in x86_spec_ctrl_current which is at odd with the other code that
> > keep track of its state in that percpu variable. Fix that by updating
> > x86_spec_ctrl_current percpu value to always match the content of the
> > SPEC_CTRL MSR.
> 
> Is this fixing an actual bug or is there some other reason for doing
> this?
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 8 ++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> > index aa2d19db2b1d..07fa23707b3c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> > +++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> > @@ -181,13 +181,17 @@ static __cpuidle int intel_idle_ibrs(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> >  	u64 spec_ctrl = spec_ctrl_current();
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > -	if (smt_active)
> > +	if (smt_active) {
> > +		__this_cpu_write(x86_spec_ctrl_current, 0);
> >  		native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, 0);
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	ret = __intel_idle(dev, drv, index);
> >  
> > -	if (smt_active)
> > +	if (smt_active) {
> >  		native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, spec_ctrl);
> > +		__this_cpu_write(x86_spec_ctrl_current, spec_ctrl);
> > +	}
> 
> More candidates for update_spec_ctrl()?

Both this and the play_dead case can't use update_spec_ctrl() because
RCU isn't there anymore and all that is noinstr. Additionally, both
sites rely on preemption being off already, where update_spec_ctrl()
can't do that.

That said, I suppose one could write it like so:

static __always_inline __update_spec_ctrl(u64 val)
{
	__this_cpu_write(x86_spec_ctrl_current, val);
	native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, val);
}

static void update_spec_ctrl(u64 val)
{
	preempt_disable();
	__update_spec_ctrl(val);
	preempt_enable();
}

And then you can use __update_spec_ctrl(). But that would need a wee
audit of using native_wrmsrl() in all places, probably ok, IIRC Xen
wasn't using our IBRS stuff anyway.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-22  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-22  0:36 [PATCH v3 0/3] x86/speculation: Disable IBRS when idle Waiman Long
2023-06-22  0:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] x86/idle: Disable IBRS when cpu is offline Waiman Long
2023-06-22  2:05   ` Randy Dunlap
2023-06-22  2:13     ` Waiman Long
2023-06-22  5:40   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-06-22 12:27     ` Waiman Long
2023-06-22  0:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] intel_idle: Sync up the SPEC_CTRL MSR value to x86_spec_ctrl_current Waiman Long
2023-06-22  5:46   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-06-22  9:38     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-06-22 12:43       ` Waiman Long
2023-06-22 13:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-22  9:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-22 12:34       ` Waiman Long
2023-06-22 12:31     ` Waiman Long
2023-06-22  0:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] intel_idle: Add ibrs_off module parameter to force disable IBRS Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230622093828.GE4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmario@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjarry@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox