From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Sathvika Vasireddy <sv@linux.ibm.com>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/14] objtool: Add support for more complex UACCESS control
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 13:49:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230622114924.GN4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02c7ecdfe636f078027fc110ab73b90331d9eb70.1687430631.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:54:34PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> On x86, UACCESS is controlled by two instructions: STAC and CLAC.
> STAC instruction enables UACCESS while CLAC disables UACCESS.
> This is simple enough for objtool to locate UACCESS enable and
> disable.
>
> But on powerpc it is a bit more complex, the same instruction is
> used for enabling and disabling UACCESS, and the same instruction
> can be used for many other things. It would be too complex to use
> exclusively instruction decoding.
>
> To help objtool, mark such instruction into .discard.uaccess_begin
> and .discard.uaccess_end sections, on the same principle as for
> reachable/unreachable instructions. And add ASM_UACCESS_BEGIN
> and ASM_UACCESS_END macros to be used in inline assembly code to
> annotate UACCESS enable and UACCESS disable instructions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
> include/linux/objtool.h | 14 +++++++++++++
> tools/objtool/check.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/objtool.h b/include/linux/objtool.h
> index 03f82c2c2ebf..d8fde4158a40 100644
> --- a/include/linux/objtool.h
> +++ b/include/linux/objtool.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,18 @@
> ".long 998b - .\n\t" \
> ".popsection\n\t"
>
> +#define ASM_UACCESS_BEGIN \
> + "998:\n\t" \
> + ".pushsection .discard.uaccess_begin\n\t" \
> + ".long 998b - .\n\t" \
> + ".popsection\n\t"
> +
> +#define ASM_UACCESS_END \
> + "998:\n\t" \
> + ".pushsection .discard.uaccess_end\n\t" \
> + ".long 998b - .\n\t" \
> + ".popsection\n\t"
> +
> #else /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
Yeah, this can work. Josh wanted a more generic hints infra, but I'm not
sure we should make you do that work now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-22 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-22 10:54 [PATCH v2 00/14] powerpc/objtool: uaccess validation for PPC32 (v2) Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] powerpc/kuap: Avoid unnecessary reads of MD_AP Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] powerpc/kuap: Avoid useless jump_label on empty function Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] powerpc/kuap: Refactor static branch for disabling kuap Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] powerpc/kuap: Make disabling KUAP at boottime impossible except on book3s/64 Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] powerpc/kuap: KUAP enabling/disabling functions must be __always_inline Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] Revert "powerpc/bug: Provide better flexibility to WARN_ON/__WARN_FLAGS() with asm goto" Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] objtool: Allow an architecture to disable objtool on ASM files Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] objtool: Fix JUMP_ENTRY_SIZE for bi-arch like powerpc Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] objtool: Add INSN_RETURN_CONDITIONAL Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] objtool: Add support for relative switch tables Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-23 15:09 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] objtool: Remove too strict constraint in jump table search Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 11:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] objtool: Add support for more complex UACCESS control Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] powerpc/bug: Annotate reachable after warning trap Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] powerpc: Implement UACCESS validation on PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-23 16:03 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-06-22 19:16 ` kernel test robot
2023-06-22 20:07 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230622114924.GN4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=sv@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox