From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CABEB64D9 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 06:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229868AbjF0GiB (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 02:38:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39428 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229788AbjF0Gh6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 02:37:58 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58C619F; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 23:37:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id D01606732D; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:37:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:37:53 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Chao Yu , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20230627063753.GA18674@lst.de> References: <20230627103900.04fa564f@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230627103900.04fa564f@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:39:00AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the ext4 tree got a conflict in: > > fs/ext4/ioctl.c > > between commit: > > 97524b454bc5 ("ext4: split ext4_shutdown") > > from Linus' tree and commit: > > c4d13222afd8 ("ext4: fix to check return value of freeze_bdev() in ext4_shutdown()") Hmm, I can't actually find the latter commit in linux-next and the context below also doesn't make it obviously cler to me what the conflict was.