From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796A8EB64D9 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 15:51:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231786AbjF0Pvz (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:51:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58020 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229481AbjF0Pvx (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:51:53 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63F71AA; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-98377c5d53eso570388966b.0; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:51:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687881111; x=1690473111; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TEINvILC+4P/bCKZ6JhrNskO2VgD6BklCUUwDEwGbD4=; b=EM41lxrCMDd6CEtpqKQp53KiHwR7ITG4AVh1PUjRwhL/TNKBVawsPvQWEpfnRflXik VULuxeJrI6jJOjZkJjWGH7bFFwTzG0coU3mpwGQRSWuaSwqnLNMzd/Eu+gkbXoBB014Q NS9IEOZOkfE3R67RiahpGaloNV7KmYgYRlHn8iNQpCU8jjbJfPDvBtDnPE9UE6QHuxVZ 0gG1nWcThqm9EaLprOGJ/Yygei97aHjI3mV098knIAyXGJdyOwAb8LnvI0Q/VhtYwTAI 700TAjs1TyHMXQ86H027nYzjwXAn4MGD0DRTTJy7BcjwLmjXW+nhnmFa7/2egKtiHjG7 V5aQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687881111; x=1690473111; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=TEINvILC+4P/bCKZ6JhrNskO2VgD6BklCUUwDEwGbD4=; b=LZA9UQgL5HiMze24KYwEzQvlOLDO1+7JbB06PkUOHoEsstifXPzZ77KoPPTGTs+Om7 lSlKzGk7LzQCIOCggUYK0UkX6kcY0ZJN0r9W8WphC1zbYEwVK5STibO4CDSaB3sU1csZ qZFNVlUW2UFGm02mfmthUXr4KLXl3cHEenAvpkYSqVQgI112jwS06P+4Oq7l59jF5izT hnVQnULjm0J6TAsMdXHIR183qOD0w71HMiNMkEhqMqQ0gr96tECN0z5zl1jBV89FOVAA DhX3mZp54vHSzFGffJtk5mUAZ0gXH8PKB9VdciTT+iJME/Jtq9xxY6APiKBBYUNTClzB 1RLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzOmeL1i5tnsHvOkEPN6HKwffQn6bLk96bmAuWmy7UxlIDddG2y 6ksNJrychQCk4RYjIHxzgAg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ56rBsWqc5TSXZQVBqt2bq5UikjjHQtF1ZR+a6bvKrfnMSQQwMxaPf74x1PuPgh3L1yUiUoew== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7603:b0:991:c566:979 with SMTP id jx3-20020a170907760300b00991c5660979mr3978930ejc.36.1687881110532; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.25.159.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ce23-20020a170906b25700b009920f18a5f0sm1005687ejb.185.2023.06.27.08.51.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:51:47 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Vladimir Oltean , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Claudiu Manoil , Alexandre Belloni , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Xiaoliang Yang , Richard Cochran , Antoine Tenart , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net: dsa: felix: don't drop PTP frames with tag_8021q when RX timestamping is disabled Message-ID: <20230627155147.atvr32v3vldnybrc@skbuf> References: <20230626154003.3153076-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> <20230626154003.3153076-4-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> <20230627151222.bn3vboqjutkqzxjs@skbuf> <20230627084651.055a228c@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230627084651.055a228c@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 08:46:51AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:12:22 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > This is still not as good as I had wanted it, because simply checking > > for HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE does not distinguish between L2 and L4 > > timestamping filters, and a port configured just with L2 traps will > > still drop L4 PTP packets. > > Out of curiosity - quick survey on why your reply does not contain: > > pw-bot: changes-requested > > a) your email address is different and the bot doesn't understand > aliases > b) commands are hard to remember > c) don't care about patchwork > d) laziness > e) other hmm, I'll tick e) unslept...