From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
To: "Nícolas F. R. A. Prado" <nfraprado@collabora.com>
Cc: "Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
kernel@collabora.com,
"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
"Bernhard Rosenkränzer" <bero@baylibre.com>,
"Amit Kucheria" <amitk@kernel.org>,
"Balsam CHIHI" <bchihi@baylibre.com>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Zhang Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts_thermal: Make readings valid in filtered mode
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 15:53:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230707075354.GA1333497@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230706161509.204546-1-nfraprado@collabora.com>
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 12:14:33PM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> Currently, when a controller is configured to use filtered mode, thermal
> readings are valid only about 30% of the time.
>
> Upon testing, it was noticed that lowering any of the interval settings
> resulted in an improved rate of valid data. The same was observed when
> decreasing the number of samples for each sensor (which also results in
> quicker measurements).
>
> Retrying the read with a timeout longer than the time it takes to
> resample (about 344us with these settings and 4 sensors) also improves
> the rate.
>
> Lower all timing settings to the minimum, configure the filtering to
> single sample, and poll the measurement register for at least one period
> to improve the data validity on filtered mode. With these changes in
> place, out of 100000 reads, a single one failed, ie 99.999% of the data
> was valid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
on Hayato. Reading out the temperature is now quite reliable.
>
> ---
>
> drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
> index 1e11defe4f35..b5fb1d8bc3d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
> @@ -58,11 +58,11 @@
> #define LVTS_PROTTC(__base) (__base + 0x00CC)
> #define LVTS_CLKEN(__base) (__base + 0x00E4)
>
> -#define LVTS_PERIOD_UNIT ((118 * 1000) / (256 * 38))
> -#define LVTS_GROUP_INTERVAL 1
> -#define LVTS_FILTER_INTERVAL 1
> -#define LVTS_SENSOR_INTERVAL 1
> -#define LVTS_HW_FILTER 0x2
> +#define LVTS_PERIOD_UNIT 0
> +#define LVTS_GROUP_INTERVAL 0
> +#define LVTS_FILTER_INTERVAL 0
> +#define LVTS_SENSOR_INTERVAL 0
> +#define LVTS_HW_FILTER 0x0
This hunk conflicts with
thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts_thermal: Disable undesired interrupts
from your other series
> #define LVTS_TSSEL_CONF 0x13121110
> #define LVTS_CALSCALE_CONF 0x300
> #define LVTS_MONINT_CONF 0x9FBF7BDE
on this line.
> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static int lvts_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
> struct lvts_sensor *lvts_sensor = thermal_zone_device_priv(tz);
> void __iomem *msr = lvts_sensor->msr;
> u32 value;
> + int rc;
>
> /*
> * Measurement registers:
> @@ -269,7 +270,7 @@ static int lvts_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
> * 16 : Valid temperature
> * 15-0 : Raw temperature
> */
> - value = readl(msr);
> + rc = readl_poll_timeout(msr, value, value & BIT(16), 240, 400);
>
> /*
> * As the thermal zone temperature will read before the
> @@ -282,7 +283,7 @@ static int lvts_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
> * functionning temperature and directly jump to a system
> * shutdown.
> */
> - if (!(value & BIT(16)))
> + if (rc)
> return -EAGAIN;
>
> *temp = lvts_raw_to_temp(value & 0xFFFF);
> --
> 2.41.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-07 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-06 16:14 [PATCH] thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts_thermal: Make readings valid in filtered mode Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2023-07-07 7:53 ` Chen-Yu Tsai [this message]
2023-07-07 8:32 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230707075354.GA1333497@google.com \
--to=wenst@chromium.org \
--cc=amitk@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=bchihi@baylibre.com \
--cc=bero@baylibre.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nfraprado@collabora.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox