public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev
To: axboe@kernel.dk, ming.lei@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, tj@kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	zhouchengming@bytedance.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] blk-mq: use percpu csd to remote complete instead of per-rq csd
Date: Fri,  7 Jul 2023 17:37:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230707093722.1338589-3-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230707093722.1338589-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>

From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>

If request need to be completed remotely, we insert it into percpu llist,
and smp_call_function_single_async() if llist is empty previously.

We don't need to use per-rq csd, percpu csd is enough. And the size of
struct request is decreased by 24 bytes.

This way is cleaner, and looks correct, given block softirq is guaranteed
to be scheduled to consume the list if one new request is added to this
percpu list, either smp_call_function_single_async() returns -EBUSY or 0.

Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
v3:
 - Remove the list and csd variables as they are only used once, as
   suggested by Christoph Hellwig.

v2:
 - Change to use call_single_data_t, which avoid to use 2 cache lines
   for 1 csd, as suggested by Ming Lei.
 - Improve the commit log, the explanation is copied from Ming Lei.
---
 block/blk-mq.c         | 12 ++++++------
 include/linux/blk-mq.h |  5 +----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index decb6ab2d508..7d013588077a 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
 #include "blk-ioprio.h"
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct llist_head, blk_cpu_done);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(call_single_data_t, blk_cpu_csd);
 
 static void blk_mq_insert_request(struct request *rq, blk_insert_t flags);
 static void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq,
@@ -1154,15 +1155,11 @@ static inline bool blk_mq_complete_need_ipi(struct request *rq)
 
 static void blk_mq_complete_send_ipi(struct request *rq)
 {
-	struct llist_head *list;
 	unsigned int cpu;
 
 	cpu = rq->mq_ctx->cpu;
-	list = &per_cpu(blk_cpu_done, cpu);
-	if (llist_add(&rq->ipi_list, list)) {
-		INIT_CSD(&rq->csd, __blk_mq_complete_request_remote, rq);
-		smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &rq->csd);
-	}
+	if (llist_add(&rq->ipi_list, &per_cpu(blk_cpu_done, cpu)))
+		smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &per_cpu(blk_cpu_csd, cpu));
 }
 
 static void blk_mq_raise_softirq(struct request *rq)
@@ -4796,6 +4793,9 @@ static int __init blk_mq_init(void)
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
 		init_llist_head(&per_cpu(blk_cpu_done, i));
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
+		INIT_CSD(&per_cpu(blk_cpu_csd, i),
+			 __blk_mq_complete_request_remote, NULL);
 	open_softirq(BLOCK_SOFTIRQ, blk_done_softirq);
 
 	cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_BLOCK_SOFTIRQ_DEAD,
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index 0a1c404e6c7a..34d400171b3e 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -180,10 +180,7 @@ struct request {
 		rq_end_io_fn		*saved_end_io;
 	} flush;
 
-	union {
-		struct __call_single_data csd;
-		u64 fifo_time;
-	};
+	u64 fifo_time;
 
 	/*
 	 * completion callback.
-- 
2.41.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-07  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-07  9:37 [PATCH v3 0/4] blk-mq: optimize the size of struct request chengming.zhou
2023-07-07  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] blk-mq: delete unused completion_data in " chengming.zhou
2023-07-07 10:05   ` Ming Lei
2023-07-07  9:37 ` chengming.zhou [this message]
2023-07-10  6:42   ` [PATCH v3 2/4] blk-mq: use percpu csd to remote complete instead of per-rq csd Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-07  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] blk-flush: count inflight flush_data requests chengming.zhou
2023-07-07  9:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] blk-flush: reuse rq queuelist in flush state machine chengming.zhou
2023-07-07 10:06   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230707093722.1338589-3-chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --to=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox