From: chengming.zhou@linux.dev
To: axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, ming.lei@redhat.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
zhouchengming@bytedance.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] blk-flush: don't need to end rq twice for non post-flush requests
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 14:47:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230710064705.1847287-2-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230710064705.1847287-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Now we unconditionally blk_rq_init_flush() to replace rq->end_io to
make rq return twice back to the flush state machine for post-flush.
Obviously, non post-flush requests don't need it, they don't need to
end request twice, so they don't need to replace rq->end_io callback.
And the same for requests with the FUA bit on hardware with FUA support.
So we move blk_rq_init_flush() to REQ_FSEQ_DATA stage and only replace
rq->end_io if it needs post-flush. Otherwise, it can end like normal
request and doesn't need to return back to the flush state machine.
There are also some other good points:
1. all requests on hardware with FUA support won't have post-flush, so
all of them don't need to end twice.
2. non post-flush requests won't have RQF_FLUSH_SEQ rq_flags set, so
they can merge like normal requests.
3. we don't account non post-flush requests in flush_data_in_flight,
since there is no point to defer pending flush for these requests.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
---
block/blk-flush.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index 094a6adb2718..1b92654e8757 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ enum {
static void blk_kick_flush(struct request_queue *q,
struct blk_flush_queue *fq, blk_opf_t flags);
+static void blk_rq_init_flush(struct request *rq);
static inline struct blk_flush_queue *
blk_get_flush_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx)
@@ -187,7 +188,15 @@ static void blk_flush_complete_seq(struct request *rq,
break;
case REQ_FSEQ_DATA:
- fq->flush_data_in_flight++;
+ /*
+ * Only for requests that need post-flush,
+ * we need to do rq->end_io replacement trick
+ * to return back to the flush state machine.
+ */
+ if (!(rq->flush.seq & REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH)) {
+ blk_rq_init_flush(rq);
+ fq->flush_data_in_flight++;
+ }
spin_lock(&q->requeue_lock);
list_move_tail(&rq->queuelist, &q->flush_list);
spin_unlock(&q->requeue_lock);
@@ -202,7 +211,13 @@ static void blk_flush_complete_seq(struct request *rq,
* normal completion and end it.
*/
list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
- blk_flush_restore_request(rq);
+ /*
+ * Only for requests that had rq->end_io replaced,
+ * we need to restore rq->end_io and make it a normal
+ * request before the second end.
+ */
+ if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_FLUSH_SEQ)
+ blk_flush_restore_request(rq);
blk_mq_end_request(rq, error);
break;
@@ -389,7 +404,6 @@ static enum rq_end_io_ret mq_flush_data_end_io(struct request *rq,
static void blk_rq_init_flush(struct request *rq)
{
- rq->flush.seq = 0;
rq->rq_flags |= RQF_FLUSH_SEQ;
rq->flush.saved_end_io = rq->end_io; /* Usually NULL */
rq->end_io = mq_flush_data_end_io;
@@ -424,6 +438,7 @@ bool blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
* the request accounting.
*/
rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_SYNC;
+ rq->flush.seq = 0;
switch (policy) {
case 0:
@@ -458,7 +473,6 @@ bool blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
* Mark the request as part of a flush sequence and submit it
* for further processing to the flush state machine.
*/
- blk_rq_init_flush(rq);
spin_lock_irq(&fq->mq_flush_lock);
blk_flush_complete_seq(rq, fq, REQ_FSEQ_ACTIONS & ~policy, 0);
spin_unlock_irq(&fq->mq_flush_lock);
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-10 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-10 6:47 [PATCH 1/2] blk-flush: fix rq->flush.seq for post-flush requests chengming.zhou
2023-07-10 6:47 ` chengming.zhou [this message]
2023-07-10 13:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] blk-flush: don't need to end rq twice for non " Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-25 13:15 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-07-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-flush: fix rq->flush.seq for " Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-11 11:06 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-07-11 11:15 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2023-07-11 11:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-11 11:52 ` Chengming Zhou
2023-07-11 12:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230710064705.1847287-2-chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--to=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox