public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
Cc: agross@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org,
	konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: qcom-pm8xxx: Fix potential deadlock on &chip->pm_irq_lock
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 11:18:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230713101848.GM10768@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230628072840.28587-1-dg573847474@gmail.com>

I'd like some additional eyes-on please.

This is very old code that you're changing and some of the people who
made the largest contributions are not on Cc.

On Wed, 28 Jun 2023, Chengfeng Ye wrote:
> As &chip->pm_irq_lock is acquired by pm8xxx_irq_handler() under irq
> context, other process context code should disable irq before acquiring
> the lock.
> 
> I think .irq_set_type and .irq_get_irqchip_state callbacks should be
> executed from process context without irq disabled by default. Thus the
> same lock acquision should disable irq.
> 
> Possible deadlock scenario
> pm8xxx_irq_set_type()
>     -> pm8xxx_config_irq()
>     -> spin_lock(&chip->pm_irq_lock)
>         <irq interrupt>
>         -> pm8xxx_irq_handler()
>         -> pm8xxx_irq_master_handler()
>         -> pm8xxx_irq_block_handler()
>         -> pm8xxx_read_block_irq()
>         -> spin_lock(&chip->pm_irq_lock) (deadlock here)
> 
> This flaw was found using an experimental static analysis tool we are
> developing for irq-related deadlock.
> 
> The tentative patch fix the potential deadlock by spin_lock_irqsave().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.c b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.c
> index 9a948df8c28d..07c531bd1236 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.c
> @@ -103,8 +103,9 @@ static int
>  pm8xxx_config_irq(struct pm_irq_chip *chip, unsigned int bp, unsigned int cp)
>  {
>  	int	rc;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&chip->pm_irq_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->pm_irq_lock, flags);
>  	rc = regmap_write(chip->regmap, SSBI_REG_ADDR_IRQ_BLK_SEL, bp);
>  	if (rc) {
>  		pr_err("Failed Selecting Block %d rc=%d\n", bp, rc);
> @@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ pm8xxx_config_irq(struct pm_irq_chip *chip, unsigned int bp, unsigned int cp)
>  	if (rc)
>  		pr_err("Failed Configuring IRQ rc=%d\n", rc);
>  bail:
> -	spin_unlock(&chip->pm_irq_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->pm_irq_lock, flags);
>  	return rc;
>  }
>  
> @@ -321,6 +322,7 @@ static int pm8xxx_irq_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
>  	struct pm_irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>  	unsigned int pmirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
>  	unsigned int bits;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  	int irq_bit;
>  	u8 block;
>  	int rc;
> @@ -331,7 +333,7 @@ static int pm8xxx_irq_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
>  	block = pmirq / 8;
>  	irq_bit = pmirq % 8;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&chip->pm_irq_lock);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->pm_irq_lock, flags);
>  	rc = regmap_write(chip->regmap, SSBI_REG_ADDR_IRQ_BLK_SEL, block);
>  	if (rc) {
>  		pr_err("Failed Selecting Block %d rc=%d\n", block, rc);
> @@ -346,7 +348,7 @@ static int pm8xxx_irq_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
>  
>  	*state = !!(bits & BIT(irq_bit));
>  bail:
> -	spin_unlock(&chip->pm_irq_lock);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->pm_irq_lock, flags);
>  
>  	return rc;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-13 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-28  7:28 [PATCH] mfd: qcom-pm8xxx: Fix potential deadlock on &chip->pm_irq_lock Chengfeng Ye
2023-07-13 10:18 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2023-07-18  7:42   ` Chengfeng Ye
2023-07-19  8:53     ` Lee Jones
2023-07-19 15:18 ` Bjorn Andersson
2023-07-20  7:24   ` Chengfeng Ye

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230713101848.GM10768@google.com \
    --to=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=dg573847474@gmail.com \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox