public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, palmer@rivosinc.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	luto@kernel.org, conor.dooley@microchip.com, heiko@sntech.de,
	jszhang@kernel.org, lazyparser@gmail.com, falcon@tinylab.org,
	chenhuacai@kernel.org, apatel@ventanamicro.com,
	atishp@atishpatra.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, bjorn@kernel.org,
	palmer@dabbelt.com, bjorn@rivosinc.com,
	daniel.thompson@linaro.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: entry: Fixup do_trap_break from kernel side
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 12:45:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230717104508.GF4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJF2gTTt23iSDG_m4ihPhXhYDrz3Xnih=KGLx_ayBLbzPqaTaQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 07:33:25AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 4:02 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 10:30:22AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 12:40 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 10:57:07PM -0400, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
> > > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > The irqentry_nmi_enter/exit would force the current context into in_interrupt.
> > > > > That would trigger the kernel to dead panic, but the kdb still needs "ebreak" to
> > > > > debug the kernel.
> > > > >
> > > > > Move irqentry_nmi_enter/exit to exception_enter/exit could correct handle_break
> > > > > of the kernel side.
> > > >
> > > > This doesn't explain much if anything :/
> > > >
> > > > I'm confused (probably because I don't know RISC-V very well), what's
> > > > EBREAK and how does it happen?
> > > EBREAK is just an instruction of riscv which would rise breakpoint exception.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Specifically, if EBREAK can happen inside an local_irq_disable() region,
> > > > then the below change is actively wrong. Any exception/interrupt that
> > > > can happen while local_irq_disable() must be treated like an NMI.
> > > When the ebreak happend out of local_irq_disable region, but
> > > __nmi_enter forces handle_break() into in_interupt() state. So how
> >
> > And why is that a problem? I think I'm missing something fundamental
> > here...
> The irqentry_nmi_enter() would force the current context to get
> in_interrupt=true, although ebreak happens in the context which is
> in_interrupt=false.
> A lot of checking codes, such as:
>         if (in_interrupt())
>                 panic("Fatal exception in interrupt");

Why would you do that?!?

Are you're trying to differentiate between an exception and an
interrupt?

You *could* have ebreak in an interrupt, right? So why panic the machine
if that happens?

> It would make the kernel panic, but we don't panic; we want back to the shell.
> eg:
> echo BUG > /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT




  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-17 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-02  2:57 [PATCH] riscv: entry: Fixup do_trap_break from kernel side guoren
2023-07-03 10:29 ` Daniel Thompson
2023-07-04  2:44   ` Guo Ren
2023-07-04 16:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-04 17:34   ` Daniel Thompson
2023-07-09  2:30   ` Guo Ren
2023-07-10  8:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-16 23:33       ` Guo Ren
2023-07-17 10:45         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2023-07-17 16:14           ` Guo Ren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230717104508.GF4253@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=falcon@tinylab.org \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=lazyparser@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox