From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Emmanuel Grumbach" <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Jesse Barnes" <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
"Shaohua Li" <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
"Thomas Renninger" <trenn@suse.de>,
"Matthew Garrett" <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Dean Luick" <dean.luick@cornelisnetworks.com>,
"Jonas Dreßler" <verdre@v0yd.nl>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 04/11] PCI/ASPM: Use RMW accessors for changing LNKCTL
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 15:04:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230717120503.15276-5-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230717120503.15276-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Don't assume that the device is fully under the control of ASPM and use
RMW capability accessors which do proper locking to avoid losing
concurrent updates to the register values.
If configuration fails in pcie_aspm_configure_common_clock(), the
function attempts to restore the old PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC settings. Store
only the old PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC bit for the relevant devices rather
than the content of the whole LNKCTL registers. It aligns better with
how pcie_lnkctl_clear_and_set() expects its parameter and makes the
code more obvious to understand.
Fixes: 2a42d9dba784 ("PCIe: ASPM: Break out of endless loop waiting for PCI config bits to switch")
Fixes: 7d715a6c1ae5 ("PCI: add PCI Express ASPM support")
Suggested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 30 +++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
index 3dafba0b5f41..1bf630059264 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static void pcie_clkpm_cap_init(struct pcie_link_state *link, int blacklist)
static void pcie_aspm_configure_common_clock(struct pcie_link_state *link)
{
int same_clock = 1;
- u16 reg16, parent_reg, child_reg[8];
+ u16 reg16, ccc, parent_old_ccc, child_old_ccc[8];
struct pci_dev *child, *parent = link->pdev;
struct pci_bus *linkbus = parent->subordinate;
/*
@@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ static void pcie_aspm_configure_common_clock(struct pcie_link_state *link)
/* Port might be already in common clock mode */
pcie_capability_read_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, ®16);
+ parent_old_ccc = reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC;
if (same_clock && (reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC)) {
bool consistent = true;
@@ -237,34 +238,29 @@ static void pcie_aspm_configure_common_clock(struct pcie_link_state *link)
pci_info(parent, "ASPM: current common clock configuration is inconsistent, reconfiguring\n");
}
+ ccc = same_clock ? PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC : 0;
/* Configure downstream component, all functions */
list_for_each_entry(child, &linkbus->devices, bus_list) {
pcie_capability_read_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, ®16);
- child_reg[PCI_FUNC(child->devfn)] = reg16;
- if (same_clock)
- reg16 |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC;
- else
- reg16 &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC;
- pcie_capability_write_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, reg16);
+ child_old_ccc[PCI_FUNC(child->devfn)] = reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC;
+ pcie_capability_clear_and_set_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL,
+ PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC, ccc);
}
/* Configure upstream component */
- pcie_capability_read_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, ®16);
- parent_reg = reg16;
- if (same_clock)
- reg16 |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC;
- else
- reg16 &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC;
- pcie_capability_write_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, reg16);
+ pcie_capability_clear_and_set_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL,
+ PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC, ccc);
if (pcie_retrain_link(link->pdev, true)) {
/* Training failed. Restore common clock configurations */
pci_err(parent, "ASPM: Could not configure common clock\n");
list_for_each_entry(child, &linkbus->devices, bus_list)
- pcie_capability_write_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL,
- child_reg[PCI_FUNC(child->devfn)]);
- pcie_capability_write_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, parent_reg);
+ pcie_capability_clear_and_set_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL,
+ PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC,
+ child_old_ccc[PCI_FUNC(child->devfn)]);
+ pcie_capability_clear_and_set_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL,
+ PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC, parent_old_ccc);
}
}
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-17 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-17 12:04 [PATCH v5 00/11] PCI: Improve PCIe Capability RMW concurrency control Ilpo Järvinen
2023-07-17 12:04 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] PCI: Add locking to RMW PCI Express Capability Register accessors Ilpo Järvinen
2023-07-17 12:04 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] PCI: Make link retraining use RMW accessors for changing LNKCTL Ilpo Järvinen
2023-07-17 12:04 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] PCI: pciehp: Use " Ilpo Järvinen
2023-07-17 12:04 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2023-07-17 12:04 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] drm/amdgpu: " Ilpo Järvinen
2023-07-20 21:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-07-21 8:07 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-07-21 14:52 ` Alex Deucher
2023-08-03 14:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-07-17 12:04 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] drm/radeon: " Ilpo Järvinen
2023-08-18 16:12 ` Deucher, Alexander
2023-08-21 9:57 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-08-21 19:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-07-17 12:04 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] net/mlx5: " Ilpo Järvinen
2023-07-17 12:05 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] wifi: ath11k: " Ilpo Järvinen
2023-07-17 12:05 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] wifi: ath12k: " Ilpo Järvinen
2023-07-17 12:05 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] wifi: ath10k: " Ilpo Järvinen
2023-07-17 12:05 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] PCI: Document the Capability accessor RMW improvements Ilpo Järvinen
2023-08-10 16:17 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] PCI: Improve PCIe Capability RMW concurrency control Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230717120503.15276-5-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dean.luick@cornelisnetworks.com \
--cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=verdre@v0yd.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox