From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCC0C04A6A for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 18:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231949AbjGRSPO (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2023 14:15:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50974 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229874AbjGRSPM (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2023 14:15:12 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C7BB99; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:15:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0326B615B5; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 18:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB4D9C433C8; Tue, 18 Jul 2023 18:15:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1689704110; bh=QH0xYXdTL5ojivjEzeCT3IU9wzvatahM/LtkztuvSTY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=M2xJPN8NkR7qyXSRJpzqMsqZ0hj4ofVwtTavhx3nB43D9hiF17Jgg0vUBjoG6GOyZ NHkodP8ygOWRSS9EcGASWagCYZyhTXUHuYsu/CHwV0wazaWRQoZmVa0kpq7LXp2KEo 28do4tKMH65/CCglk9STCpu4TQbBi/e0ydhVmLGH3TWi1Je5kii3sUONcHdZqYy8U0 8duXFGfRsHj7lNVAeSuuI6a3XqyZcESPQZSAS3CRKS7mCfin+89r6P8xdnFUriaByd /8tmr35CcRgdRHefUBhC2OWYDewm1En+PQlBGS0Xnera7dOX1hV4Lo/tGRsDCtGUpg Kr8fgqNGjuE0g== Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:15:08 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Mina Almasry , Andy Lutomirski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Sumit Semwal , Christian =?UTF-8?B?S8O2bmln?= , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Ilias Apalodimas , Arnd Bergmann , David Ahern , Willem de Bruijn , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Device Memory TCP Message-ID: <20230718111508.6f0b9a83@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230710223304.1174642-1-almasrymina@google.com> <12393cd2-4b09-4956-fff0-93ef3929ee37@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 15:06:29 -0300 Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > netlink feels like a weird API choice for that, in particular it would > be really wrong to somehow bind the lifecycle of a netlink object to a > process. Netlink is the right API, life cycle of objects can be easily tied to a netlink socket.