From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>,
ltp@lists.linux.it, Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@nokia.com>,
Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: Fix sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice intial value
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 13:21:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230719112136.GA1239020@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230719103743.4775-2-chrubis@suse.cz>
Hi,
[ Cc Shile Zhang ]
> Thre is 10% rounding error in the intial value of the
> sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice with CONFIG_HZ_300=y.
> This was found with LTP test sched_rr_get_interval01:
> sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed
> sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns
> sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90
> sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed
> sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns
> sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90
> What this test does is to compare the return value from the
> sched_rr_get_interval() and the sched_rr_timeslice_ms sysctl file and
> fails if they do not match.
> The prolem it found is the intial sysctl file value which was computed as:
> static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * RR_TIMESLICE;
> which works fine as long as MSEC_PER_SEC is multiple of HZ, however it
> introduces 10% rounding error for CONFIG_HZ_300:
> (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * (100 * HZ / 1000)
> (1000 / 300) * (100 * 300 / 1000)
> 3 * 30 = 90
> This can be easily fixed by reversing the order of the multiplication
> and division. After this fix we get:
> (MSEC_PER_SEC * (100 * HZ / 1000)) / HZ
> (1000 * (100 * 300 / 1000)) / 300
> (1000 * 30) / 300 = 100
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> CC: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
> ---
> kernel/sched/rt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index 00e0e5074115..185d3d749f6b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ unsigned int sysctl_sched_rt_period = 1000000;
> int sysctl_sched_rt_runtime = 950000;
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> -static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * RR_TIMESLICE;
> +static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC * RR_TIMESLICE) / HZ;
It looks like very old bug, from v4.11-rc1. I guess this should go to all stable
and LTS kernels.
Fixes: 975e155ed873 ("sched/rt: Show the 'sched_rr_timeslice' SCHED_RR timeslice tuning knob in milliseconds")
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Kind regards,
Petr
> static int sched_rt_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
> size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
> static int sched_rr_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-19 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-19 10:37 [PATCH 0/2] Two fixes for sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice Cyril Hrubis
2023-07-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/rt: Fix sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice intial value Cyril Hrubis
2023-07-19 11:21 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2023-07-20 9:57 ` Mel Gorman
2023-07-21 16:16 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2023-07-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/rt: sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice show default timeslice after reset Cyril Hrubis
2023-07-20 10:00 ` Mel Gorman
2023-07-21 16:14 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230719112136.GA1239020@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=shile.zhang@nokia.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox