public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jinrong Liang <ljr.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>,
	Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 6/6] KVM: selftests: Test gp event filters don't affect fixed event filters
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 19:47:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230720114714.34079-7-cloudliang@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230720114714.34079-1-cloudliang@tencent.com>

From: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>

Add a test to ensure that setting both generic and fixed performance
event filters does not affect the consistency of the fixed event filter
behavior in KVM.

Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>
---
 .../kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c        | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
index a9d44ec210c4..08c7ccd81be2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
@@ -838,6 +838,19 @@ static uint64_t test_with_fixed_counter_filter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return run_vcpu_to_sync(vcpu);
 }
 
+static uint64_t test_set_gp_and_fixed_event_filter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+						   uint32_t action,
+						   uint32_t bitmap)
+{
+	struct __kvm_pmu_event_filter f = base_event_filter;
+
+	f.action = action;
+	f.fixed_counter_bitmap = bitmap;
+	do_vcpu_set_pmu_event_filter(vcpu, &f);
+
+	return run_vcpu_to_sync(vcpu);
+}
+
 static void __test_fixed_counter_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint8_t idx,
 					uint8_t nr_fixed_counters)
 {
@@ -864,6 +877,20 @@ static void __test_fixed_counter_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint8_t idx,
 		count = test_with_fixed_counter_filter(vcpu, KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY,
 						       bitmap);
 		ASSERT_EQ(!!count, !(bitmap & BIT(idx)));
+
+		/*
+		 * Check that fixed_counter_bitmap has higher priority than
+		 * events[] when both are set.
+		 */
+		count = test_set_gp_and_fixed_event_filter(vcpu,
+							   KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW,
+							   bitmap);
+		ASSERT_EQ(!!count, !!(bitmap & BIT(idx)));
+
+		count = test_set_gp_and_fixed_event_filter(vcpu,
+							   KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY,
+							   bitmap);
+		ASSERT_EQ(!!count, !(bitmap & BIT(idx)));
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.39.3


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-20 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-20 11:47 [PATCH v5 0/6] KVM: selftests: Improve PMU event filter settings and add test cases Jinrong Liang
2023-07-20 11:47 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] KVM: selftests: Add x86 properties for Intel PMU in processor.h Jinrong Liang
2023-07-20 11:47 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] KVM: selftests: Drop the return of remove_event() Jinrong Liang
2023-07-20 11:47 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] KVM: selftests: Introduce __kvm_pmu_event_filter to improved event filter settings Jinrong Liang
2023-07-20 11:47 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] KVM: selftests: Add test cases for unsupported PMU event filter input values Jinrong Liang
2023-07-20 11:47 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] KVM: selftests: Test if event filter meets expectations on fixed counters Jinrong Liang
2023-07-20 11:47 ` Jinrong Liang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230720114714.34079-7-cloudliang@tencent.com \
    --to=ljr.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
    --cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox