public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>,
	Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping kernel-emulated instructions
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 11:44:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230724094716.91510-4-iii@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230724094716.91510-1-iii@linux.ibm.com>

Single-stepping a kernel-emulated instruction that generates an
interrupt causes GDB to land on the instruction following it instead of
the respective interrupt handler.

The reason is that kvm_handle_sie_intercept(), after injecting the
interrupt, also processes the PER event and arranges a KVM_SINGLESTEP
exit. The interrupt is not yet delivered, however, so the userspace
sees the next instruction.

Fix by avoiding the KVM_SINGLESTEP exit when there is a pending
interrupt. The next __vcpu_run() loop iteration will arrange a
KVM_SINGLESTEP exit after delivering the interrupt.

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
index 7cdd927541b0..d2f7940c5d03 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
@@ -583,6 +583,19 @@ static int handle_pv_notification(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return handle_instruction(vcpu);
 }
 
+static bool should_handle_per_ifetch(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int rc)
+{
+	/* Process PER, also if the instruction is processed in user space. */
+	if (!(vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptstatus & 0x02))
+		return false;
+	if (rc != 0 && rc != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+		return false;
+	if (guestdbg_sstep_enabled(vcpu) && vcpu->arch.local_int.pending_irqs)
+		/* __vcpu_run() will exit after delivering the interrupt. */
+		return false;
+	return true;
+}
+
 int kvm_handle_sie_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	int rc, per_rc = 0;
@@ -645,9 +658,7 @@ int kvm_handle_sie_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 
-	/* process PER, also if the instruction is processed in user space */
-	if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptstatus & 0x02 &&
-	    (!rc || rc == -EOPNOTSUPP))
+	if (should_handle_per_ifetch(vcpu, rc))
 		per_rc = kvm_s390_handle_per_ifetch_icpt(vcpu);
 	return per_rc ? per_rc : rc;
 }
-- 
2.41.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-24  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-24  9:44 [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix stepping into interrupt handlers Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-24  9:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 11:56   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-07-24  9:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping into program " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25  8:58   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-07-24  9:44 ` Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2023-07-25 12:04   ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping kernel-emulated instructions Claudio Imbrenda
2023-07-24  9:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping userspace-emulated instructions Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-24 11:31   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-25 12:25   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-07-24  9:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping keyless mode exits Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-24  9:44 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: s390: selftests: Add selftest for single-stepping Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 13:53   ` Claudio Imbrenda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230724094716.91510-4-iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox