RE: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings

Pandey, Radhey Shyam
2023-08-12T12:57:48Z

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 9:47 PM
> To: Pandey, Radhey Shyam <radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com>
> Cc: andersson@kernel.org; mathieu.poirier@linaro.org;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org; conor+dt@kernel.org; Simek, Michal
> <michal.simek@amd.com>; Levinsky, Ben <ben.levinsky@amd.com>; Shah,
> Tanmay <tanmay.shah@amd.com>; linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; git (AMD-Xilinx) <git@amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled
> Memory (TCM) bindings
>
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 12:11:48AM +0530, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
> > Introduce bindings for TCM memory address space on AMD-xilinx Zynq
> > UltraScale+ platform. It will help in defining TCM in device-tree
> > and make it's access platform agnostic and data-driven.
>
> From the subject, it sounds like this is a binding for all of remoteproc for
> TCMs.
>
> Otherwise,
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Thanks for the review. Just checking if this patch will be taken through
devicetree or remoteproc tree?