From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping userspace-emulated instructions
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 14:25:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230725142501.36073387@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230724094716.91510-5-iii@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 11:44:10 +0200
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Single-stepping a userspace-emulated instruction that generates an
> interrupt causes GDB to land on the instruction following it instead of
> the respective interrupt handler.
>
> The reason is that after arranging a KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC exit,
> kvm_handle_sie_intercept() calls kvm_s390_handle_per_ifetch_icpt(),
> which sets KVM_GUESTDBG_EXIT_PENDING. This bit, however, is not
> processed immediately, but rather persists until the next ioctl(),
> causing a spurious single-step exit.
>
> Fix by clearing this bit in ioctl().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 0c6333b108ba..e6511608280c 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -5383,6 +5383,7 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = filp->private_data;
> void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
> + int rc;
>
> switch (ioctl) {
> case KVM_S390_IRQ: {
> @@ -5390,7 +5391,8 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl(struct file *filp,
>
> if (copy_from_user(&s390irq, argp, sizeof(s390irq)))
> return -EFAULT;
> - return kvm_s390_inject_vcpu(vcpu, &s390irq);
> + rc = kvm_s390_inject_vcpu(vcpu, &s390irq);
> + break;
> }
> case KVM_S390_INTERRUPT: {
> struct kvm_s390_interrupt s390int;
> @@ -5400,10 +5402,25 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_async_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> return -EFAULT;
> if (s390int_to_s390irq(&s390int, &s390irq))
> return -EINVAL;
> - return kvm_s390_inject_vcpu(vcpu, &s390irq);
> + rc = kvm_s390_inject_vcpu(vcpu, &s390irq);
> + break;
> }
> + default:
> + rc = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> + break;
> }
> - return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> +
> + /*
> + * To simplify single stepping of userspace-emulated instructions,
> + * KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC exit sets KVM_GUESTDBG_EXIT_PENDING (see
> + * should_handle_per_ifetch()). However, if userspace emulation injects
> + * an interrupt, it needs to be cleared, so that KVM_EXIT_DEBUG happens
> + * after (and not before) the interrupt delivery.
> + */
> + if (!rc)
> + vcpu->guest_debug &= ~KVM_GUESTDBG_EXIT_PENDING;
> +
> + return rc;
> }
>
> static int kvm_s390_handle_pv_vcpu_dump(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-25 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-24 9:44 [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix stepping into interrupt handlers Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-24 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 11:56 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-07-24 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping into program " Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 8:58 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-07-24 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping kernel-emulated instructions Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 12:04 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-07-24 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping userspace-emulated instructions Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-24 11:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-07-25 12:25 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2023-07-24 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping keyless mode exits Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-24 9:44 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: s390: selftests: Add selftest for single-stepping Ilya Leoshkevich
2023-07-25 13:53 ` Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230725142501.36073387@p-imbrenda \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox