From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: check the kvm_cpu_get_interrupt result before using it
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:59:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230726135945.260841-4-mlevitsk@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230726135945.260841-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
The code was blindly assuming that kvm_cpu_get_interrupt never returns -1
when there is a pending interrupt.
While this should be true, a bug in KVM can still cause this.
If -1 is returned, the code before this patch was converting it to 0xFF,
and 0xFF interrupt was injected to the guest, which results in an issue
which was hard to debug.
Add WARN_ON_ONCE to catch this case and skip the injection
if this happens again.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index a6b9bea62fb8ac..00b87fcf6da4af 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -10203,9 +10203,13 @@ static int kvm_check_and_inject_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (r < 0)
goto out;
if (r) {
- kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu), false);
- static_call(kvm_x86_inject_irq)(vcpu, false);
- WARN_ON(static_call(kvm_x86_interrupt_allowed)(vcpu, true) < 0);
+ int irq = kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(vcpu);
+
+ if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(irq == -1)) {
+ kvm_queue_interrupt(vcpu, irq, false);
+ static_call(kvm_x86_inject_irq)(vcpu, false);
+ WARN_ON(static_call(kvm_x86_interrupt_allowed)(vcpu, true) < 0);
+ }
}
if (kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr(vcpu))
static_call(kvm_x86_enable_irq_window)(vcpu);
--
2.26.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-26 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-26 13:59 [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix 'Spurious APIC interrupt (vector 0xFF) on CPU#n' issue Maxim Levitsky
2023-07-26 13:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: VMX: __kvm_apic_update_irr must update the IRR atomically Maxim Levitsky
2023-07-26 13:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86: VMX: set irr_pending in kvm_apic_update_irr Maxim Levitsky
2023-07-26 13:59 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2023-07-29 1:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix 'Spurious APIC interrupt (vector 0xFF) on CPU#n' issue Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29 14:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230726135945.260841-4-mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox