public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 12/21] KVM: x86: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "XSAVES enabled"
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 18:15:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230729011608.1065019-13-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230729011608.1065019-1-seanjc@google.com>

Use the governed feature framework to track if XSAVES is "enabled", i.e.
if XSAVES can be used by the guest.  Add a comment in the SVM code to
explain the very unintuitive logic of deliberately NOT checking if XSAVES
is enumerated in the guest CPUID model.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/governed_features.h |  1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c           | 17 ++++++++++++++---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c           | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c               |  4 ++--
 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/governed_features.h b/arch/x86/kvm/governed_features.h
index b29c15d5e038..b896a64e4ac3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/governed_features.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/governed_features.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ BUILD_BUG()
 #define KVM_GOVERNED_X86_FEATURE(x) KVM_GOVERNED_FEATURE(X86_FEATURE_##x)
 
 KVM_GOVERNED_X86_FEATURE(GBPAGES)
+KVM_GOVERNED_X86_FEATURE(XSAVES)
 
 #undef KVM_GOVERNED_X86_FEATURE
 #undef KVM_GOVERNED_FEATURE
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 64092df06f94..d5f8cb402eb7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -4204,9 +4204,20 @@ static void svm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
 	struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
 
-	vcpu->arch.xsaves_enabled = guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE) &&
-				    boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE) &&
-				    boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES);
+	/*
+	 * SVM doesn't provide a way to disable just XSAVES in the guest, KVM
+	 * can only disable all variants of by disallowing CR4.OSXSAVE from
+	 * being set.  As a result, if the host has XSAVE and XSAVES, and the
+	 * guest has XSAVE enabled, the guest can execute XSAVES without
+	 * faulting.  Treat XSAVES as enabled in this case regardless of
+	 * whether it's advertised to the guest so that KVM context switches
+	 * XSS on VM-Enter/VM-Exit.  Failure to do so would effectively give
+	 * the guest read/write access to the host's XSS.
+	 */
+	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE) &&
+	    boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES) &&
+	    guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE))
+		kvm_governed_feature_set(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVES);
 
 	/* Update nrips enabled cache */
 	svm->nrips_enabled = kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_NRIPS) &&
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index a0a47be2feed..3100ed62615c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -4518,16 +4518,19 @@ vmx_adjust_secondary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, u32 *exec_control,
  * based on a single guest CPUID bit, with a dedicated feature bit.  This also
  * verifies that the control is actually supported by KVM and hardware.
  */
-#define vmx_adjust_sec_exec_control(vmx, exec_control, name, feat_name, ctrl_name, exiting) \
-({									 \
-	bool __enabled;							 \
-									 \
-	if (cpu_has_vmx_##name()) {					 \
-		__enabled = guest_cpuid_has(&(vmx)->vcpu,		 \
-					    X86_FEATURE_##feat_name);	 \
-		vmx_adjust_secondary_exec_control(vmx, exec_control,	 \
-			SECONDARY_EXEC_##ctrl_name, __enabled, exiting); \
-	}								 \
+#define vmx_adjust_sec_exec_control(vmx, exec_control, name, feat_name, ctrl_name, exiting)	\
+({												\
+	struct kvm_vcpu *__vcpu = &(vmx)->vcpu;							\
+	bool __enabled;										\
+												\
+	if (cpu_has_vmx_##name()) {								\
+		if (kvm_is_governed_feature(X86_FEATURE_##feat_name))				\
+			__enabled = guest_can_use(__vcpu, X86_FEATURE_##feat_name);		\
+		else										\
+			__enabled = guest_cpuid_has(__vcpu, X86_FEATURE_##feat_name);		\
+		vmx_adjust_secondary_exec_control(vmx, exec_control, SECONDARY_EXEC_##ctrl_name,\
+						  __enabled, exiting);				\
+	}											\
 })
 
 /* More macro magic for ENABLE_/opt-in versus _EXITING/opt-out controls. */
@@ -4587,10 +4590,7 @@ static u32 vmx_secondary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 	if (!enable_pml || !atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->nr_memslots_dirty_logging))
 		exec_control &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_PML;
 
-	if (cpu_has_vmx_xsaves())
-		vmx_adjust_secondary_exec_control(vmx, &exec_control,
-						  SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_XSAVES,
-						  vcpu->arch.xsaves_enabled, false);
+	vmx_adjust_sec_exec_feature(vmx, &exec_control, xsaves, XSAVES);
 
 	/*
 	 * RDPID is also gated by ENABLE_RDTSCP, turn on the control if either
@@ -4609,6 +4609,7 @@ static u32 vmx_secondary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 						  SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_RDTSCP,
 						  rdpid_or_rdtscp_enabled, false);
 	}
+
 	vmx_adjust_sec_exec_feature(vmx, &exec_control, invpcid, INVPCID);
 
 	vmx_adjust_sec_exec_exiting(vmx, &exec_control, rdrand, RDRAND);
@@ -7722,6 +7723,9 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 				    boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE) &&
 				    guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE) &&
 				    guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVES);
+	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE) &&
+	    guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE))
+		kvm_governed_feature_check_and_set(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVES);
 
 	vmx_setup_uret_msrs(vmx);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 5a14378ed4e1..201fa957ce9a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1012,7 +1012,7 @@ void kvm_load_guest_xsave_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		if (vcpu->arch.xcr0 != host_xcr0)
 			xsetbv(XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK, vcpu->arch.xcr0);
 
-		if (vcpu->arch.xsaves_enabled &&
+		if (guest_can_use(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVES) &&
 		    vcpu->arch.ia32_xss != host_xss)
 			wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_XSS, vcpu->arch.ia32_xss);
 	}
@@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ void kvm_load_host_xsave_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		if (vcpu->arch.xcr0 != host_xcr0)
 			xsetbv(XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK, host_xcr0);
 
-		if (vcpu->arch.xsaves_enabled &&
+		if (guest_can_use(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVES) &&
 		    vcpu->arch.ia32_xss != host_xss)
 			wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_XSS, host_xss);
 	}
-- 
2.41.0.487.g6d72f3e995-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-29  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-29  1:15 [PATCH v2 00/21] KVM: x86: Add "governed" X86_FEATURE framework Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] KVM: nSVM: Check instead of asserting on nested TSC scaling support Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 02/21] KVM: nSVM: Load L1's TSC multiplier based on L1 state, not L2 state Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] KVM: nSVM: Use the "outer" helper for writing multiplier to MSR_AMD64_TSC_RATIO Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] KVM: SVM: Clean up preemption toggling related " Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] KVM: x86: Always write vCPU's current TSC offset/ratio in vendor hooks Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] KVM: nSVM: Skip writes to MSR_AMD64_TSC_RATIO if guest state isn't loaded Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/21] KVM: x86: Add a framework for enabling KVM-governed x86 features Sean Christopherson
2023-08-14  4:43   ` Zeng Guang
2023-08-14 17:20     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "GBPAGES enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/21] KVM: VMX: Recompute "XSAVES enabled" only after CPUID update Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 10/21] KVM: VMX: Check KVM CPU caps, not just VMX MSR support, for XSAVE enabling Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` [PATCH v2 11/21] KVM: VMX: Rename XSAVES control to follow KVM's preferred "ENABLE_XYZ" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:15 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-08-14  6:28   ` [PATCH v2 12/21] KVM: x86: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "XSAVES enabled" Zeng Guang
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 13/21] KVM: nVMX: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "nested VMX enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-08-14  8:11   ` Yuan Yao
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 14/21] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "NRIPS enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 15/21] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "TSC scaling enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 16/21] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "vVM{SAVE,LOAD} enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 17/21] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "LBRv enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 18/21] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "Pause Filter enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 19/21] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "vGIF enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 20/21] KVM: nSVM: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "vNMI enabled" Sean Christopherson
2023-07-29  1:16 ` [PATCH v2 21/21] KVM: x86: Disallow guest CPUID lookups when IRQs are disabled Sean Christopherson
2023-08-04  0:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/21] KVM: x86: Add "governed" X86_FEATURE framework Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230729011608.1065019-13-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox