From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: limin <limin100@huawei.com>, Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
shakeelb@google.com, songmuchun@bytedance.com, tj@kernel.org,
lizefan.x@bytedance.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jorge Lucangeli Obes <jorgelo@chromium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 16:37:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230731.ahcei5eP4aef@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed1f6874-0f24-8145-63d4-efe28545381b@digikod.net>
Hi limin,
Just to let you know that Jeff's patch was merged and is available since
Linux 6.3:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230114020306.1407195-1-jeffxu@google.com/
Regards,
Mickaël
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 08:32:41PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> I checked and the Landlock ptrace test failed because Yama is enabled, which
> is expected. You can check that with /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope
>
> Jeff Xu sent a patch to fix this case but it is not ready yet:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628222941.2642917-1-jeffxu@google.com
>
> Could you please send a new patch Jeff, and add Limin in Cc?
>
>
> On 29/11/2022 12:26, limin wrote:
> > cat /proc/cmdline
> > BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-6.1.0-next-20221116
> > root=UUID=a65b3a79-dc02-4728-8a0c-5cf24f4ae08b ro
> > systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1 cgroup_no_v1=all
> >
> >
> > config
> >
> > #
> > # Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT.
> > # Linux/x86 6.1.0-rc6 Kernel Configuration
> > #
>
> [...]
>
> > CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA=y
>
> [...]
>
> > CONFIG_LSM="landlock,lockdown,yama,integrity,apparmor"
> [...]
> >
> > On 2022/11/29 19:03, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > > I tested with next-20221116 and all tests are OK. Could you share your
> > > kernel configuration with a link? What is the content of /proc/cmdline?
> > >
> > > On 29/11/2022 02:42, limin wrote:
> > > > I run test on Linux ubuntu2204 6.1.0-next-20221116
> > > >
> > > > I did't use yama.
> > > >
> > > > you can reproduce by this step:
> > > >
> > > > cd kernel_src
> > > >
> > > > cd tools/testing/selftests/landlock/
> > > > make
> > > > ./ptrace_test
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2022/11/29 3:44, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > > > > This patch changes the test semantic and then cannot work on my test
> > > > > environment. On which kernel did you run test? Do you use Yama or
> > > > > something similar?
> > > > >
> > > > > On 28/11/2022 03:04, limin wrote:
> > > > > > Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the parent,
> > > > > > trace parent return -1 when child== 0
> > > > > > How to reproduce warning:
> > > > > > $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=landlock run_tests
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: limin <limin100@huawei.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c | 5 ++---
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c
> > > > > > b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c
> > > > > > index c28ef98ff3ac..88c4dc63eea0 100644
> > > > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c
> > > > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/ptrace_test.c
> > > > > > @@ -267,12 +267,11 @@ TEST_F(hierarchy, trace)
> > > > > > /* Tests PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_MODE_READ on the
> > > > > > parent. */
> > > > > > err_proc_read = test_ptrace_read(parent);
> > > > > > ret = ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, parent, NULL, 0);
> > > > > > + EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
> > > > > > + EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno);
> > > > > > if (variant->domain_child) {
> > > > > > - EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
> > > > > > - EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno);
> > > > > > EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, err_proc_read);
> > > > > > } else {
> > > > > > - EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
> > > > > > EXPECT_EQ(0, err_proc_read);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > if (ret == 0) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-31 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-28 2:04 [PATCH -next] selftests/landlock: Fix selftest ptrace_test run fail limin
2022-11-28 19:44 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-11-29 1:42 ` limin
2022-11-29 11:03 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-11-29 11:26 ` limin
2022-11-30 19:32 ` Mickaël Salaün
2022-11-30 19:47 ` Jeff Xu
2023-07-31 14:37 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2022-11-29 12:00 ` limin
2022-11-30 3:40 ` limin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230731.ahcei5eP4aef@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jeffxu@google.com \
--cc=jorgelo@chromium.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=limin100@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox