From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: cpu: refactor deprecated strncpy
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 16:33:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202308011631.BDCD5CE33A@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230801-arch-riscv-kernel-v1-1-2b3f2dc0bc61@google.com>
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 09:14:56PM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> `strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings [1].
>
> A suitable replacement is `strscpy` [2] due to the fact that it
> guarantees NUL-termination on its destination buffer argument which is
> _not_ the case for `strncpy`!
>
> The `sv_type` buffer is declared with a size of 16 which is then
> followed by some `strncpy` calls to populate the buffer with one of:
> "sv32", "sv57", "sv48", "sv39" or "none". Hard-coding the max length as 5 is
> error-prone and involves counting the number of characters (and
> hopefully not forgetting to count the NUL-byte) in the raw string.
>
> Using a pre-determined max length in combination with `strscpy` provides
> a cleaner, less error-prone as well as a less ambiguous implementation.
> `strscpy` guarantees that it's destination buffer is NUL-terminated even
> if it's source argument exceeds the max length as defined by the third
> argument.
>
> To be clear, there is no bug (i think?) in the current implementation
> but the current hard-coded values in combination with using a deprecated
> interface make this a worthwhile change, IMO.
>
> [1]: www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings
> [2]: manpages.debian.org/testing/linux-manual-4.8/strscpy.9.en.html
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90
> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> index a2fc952318e9..1c576e4ec171 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> #include <asm/smp.h>
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>
> +#define SV_TYPE_MAX_LENGTH 16
> +
> /*
> * Returns the hart ID of the given device tree node, or -ENODEV if the node
> * isn't an enabled and valid RISC-V hart node.
> @@ -271,21 +273,21 @@ static void print_isa(struct seq_file *f, const char *isa)
>
> static void print_mmu(struct seq_file *f)
> {
> - char sv_type[16];
> + char sv_type[SV_TYPE_MAX_LENGTH];
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> #if defined(CONFIG_32BIT)
> - strncpy(sv_type, "sv32", 5);
> + strscpy(sv_type, "sv32", SV_TYPE_MAX_LENGTH);
> #elif defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
> if (pgtable_l5_enabled)
> - strncpy(sv_type, "sv57", 5);
> + strscpy(sv_type, "sv57", SV_TYPE_MAX_LENGTH);
> else if (pgtable_l4_enabled)
> - strncpy(sv_type, "sv48", 5);
> + strscpy(sv_type, "sv48", SV_TYPE_MAX_LENGTH);
> else
> - strncpy(sv_type, "sv39", 5);
> + strscpy(sv_type, "sv39", SV_TYPE_MAX_LENGTH);
> #endif
> #else
> - strncpy(sv_type, "none", 5);
> + strscpy(sv_type, "none", SV_TYPE_MAX_LENGTH);
> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
> seq_printf(f, "mmu\t\t: %s\n", sv_type);
> }
I'd say just throw the whole buffer away and just avoid copying the
.rodata strings onto the stack for no reason. They can be used directly:
static void print_mmu(struct seq_file *f)
{
const char *sv_type;
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
#if defined(CONFIG_32BIT)
sv_type = "sv32";
#elif defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
if (pgtable_l5_enabled)
sv_type = "sv57";
else if (pgtable_l4_enabled)
sv_type = "sv48";
else
sv_type = "sv39";
#endif
#else
sv_type = "none";
#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
seq_printf(f, "mmu\t\t: %s\n", sv_type);
}
--
Kees Cook
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-01 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-01 21:14 [PATCH] RISC-V: cpu: refactor deprecated strncpy Justin Stitt
2023-08-01 21:26 ` Conor Dooley
2023-08-01 22:22 ` Justin Stitt
2023-08-01 23:02 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-08-01 23:30 ` Kees Cook
2023-08-01 23:33 ` Kees Cook [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202308011631.BDCD5CE33A@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox