public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/7] x86: Fix amd_check_microcode() declaration
Date: Thu,  3 Aug 2023 10:26:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230803082619.1369127-2-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230803082619.1369127-1-arnd@kernel.org>

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

The newly added amd_check_microcode() function has two conflicting definitions
if CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD is enabled and CONFIG_MICROCODE_AMD is disabled. Since
the header with the stub definition is not included in cpu/amd.c, this only
causes a -Wmissing-prototype warning with W=1

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c:1289:6: error: no previous prototype for 'amd_check_microcode' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]

Adding the missing #include shows the other problem:

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c:1290:6: error: redefinition of 'amd_check_microcode'
arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h:58:20: note: previous definition of 'amd_check_microcode' with type 'void(void)'

Move the declaration into a more appropriate header that is already included,
with the #ifdef check changed to match the definition's.

Fixes: 522b1d69219d8 ("x86/cpu/amd: Add a Zenbleed fix")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h | 3 +--
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h     | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h
index a9b3f9635727e..81d3294b2b5e2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h
@@ -47,12 +47,11 @@ struct microcode_amd {
 extern void load_ucode_amd_early(unsigned int cpuid_1_eax);
 extern int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd(unsigned int family);
 void reload_ucode_amd(unsigned int cpu);
-extern void amd_check_microcode(void);
 #else
 static inline void load_ucode_amd_early(unsigned int cpuid_1_eax) {}
 static inline int __init
 save_microcode_in_initrd_amd(unsigned int family) { return -EINVAL; }
 static inline void reload_ucode_amd(unsigned int cpu) {}
-static inline void amd_check_microcode(void) {}
 #endif
+
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_MICROCODE_AMD_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index d46300e94f853..36d52075fdade 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -682,9 +682,11 @@ extern u16 get_llc_id(unsigned int cpu);
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD
 extern u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void);
 extern u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void);
+extern void amd_check_microcode(void);
 #else
 static inline u32 amd_get_nodes_per_socket(void)	{ return 0; }
 static inline u32 amd_get_highest_perf(void)		{ return 0; }
+static inline void amd_check_microcode(void)		{ }
 #endif
 
 extern unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp);
-- 
2.39.2


  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-03  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-03  8:26 [PATCH v3 0/7] x86: remaining -Wmissing-prototype warning fixes Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-03  8:26 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2023-08-03  8:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] x86: apic: hide unused safe_smp_processor_id on UP Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-03  8:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] x86: avoid unneeded __div64_32 function definition Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-03 15:59   ` [tip: x86/cleanups] x86/asm: Avoid " tip-bot2 for Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-03  8:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] x86: purgatory: include header for warn() declaration Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-03 15:59   ` [tip: x86/cleanups] x86/purgatory: Include " tip-bot2 for Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-03  8:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] x86: alternative: add __alt_reloc_selftest prototype Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-03 15:59   ` [tip: x86/cleanups] x86/alternative: Add a __alt_reloc_selftest() prototype tip-bot2 for Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-03  8:26 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] x86: paravirt: shut up unused native_pv_lock_init() function warning Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-03 15:59   ` [tip: x86/cleanups] x86/paravirt: Silence " tip-bot2 for Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-03  8:26 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] x86: qspinlock-paravirt: fix mising-prototype warning Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-03 15:59   ` [tip: x86/cleanups] x86/qspinlock-paravirt: Fix missing-prototype warning tip-bot2 for Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-03 10:04 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] x86: remaining -Wmissing-prototype warning fixes Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230803082619.1369127-2-arnd@kernel.org \
    --to=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox