From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: Zhu Wang <wangzhu9@huawei.com>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
<robh@kernel.org>, <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] usb: gadget: udc: gr_udc: Do not check 0 for platform_get_irq()
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 13:55:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230803135523.3959059c@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230803114246.79820-1-wangzhu9@huawei.com>
Hi Zhu,
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 19:42:46 +0800
Zhu Wang <wangzhu9@huawei.com> wrote:
> When platform_get_irq_byname() is called to get a interrupt number, it
> may return -EINVAL or -ENXIO when failed, while current code returned
> -ENODEV, so we replace it with the return value of
> platform_get_irq_byname(). And we found that platform_get_irq_byname()
> never returned zero by reading its code.
The function involve in the code is not platform_get_irq_byname() but
platform_get_irq(). Can you update ?
With this updated,
Reviewed-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Best regards,
Hervé
>
> Commit ce753ad1549c ("platform: finally disallow IRQ0 in
> platform_get_irq() and its ilk") makes sure IRQ0 is not returned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Wang <wangzhu9@huawei.com>
>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Update the commit message, present the reason of replacing the return
> value of the probe.
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/gr_udc.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/gr_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/gr_udc.c
> index 0c3969301a53..c6dfa7cccc11 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/gr_udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/gr_udc.c
> @@ -2136,15 +2136,15 @@ static int gr_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(regs);
>
> dev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (dev->irq <= 0)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + if (dev->irq < 0)
> + return dev->irq;
>
> /* Some core configurations has separate irqs for IN and OUT events */
> dev->irqi = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> if (dev->irqi > 0) {
> dev->irqo = platform_get_irq(pdev, 2);
> - if (dev->irqo <= 0)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + if (dev->irqo < 0)
> + return dev->irqo;
> } else {
> dev->irqi = 0;
> }
--
Hervé Codina, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-03 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-03 11:42 [PATCH -next v2] usb: gadget: udc: gr_udc: Do not check 0 for platform_get_irq() Zhu Wang
2023-08-03 11:55 ` Herve Codina [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230803135523.3959059c@bootlin.com \
--to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=wangzhu9@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox