From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas@t-8ch.de>
Cc: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>,
arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, tanyuan@tinylab.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] selftests/nolibc: fix up O= option support
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 19:54:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230804175429.GC31163@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d909cf7d-a7b0-4830-89cf-64e8980c4c32@t-8ch.de>
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 07:51:50PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2023-08-05 00:29:10+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > > On 2023-08-04 23:52:18+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > > > > On 2023-08-04 15:43:42+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > > > > > Hi, Thomas
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 2023-08-03 22:45:52+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > > > > > > > To avoid pollute the source code tree and avoid mrproper for every
> > > > > > > > architecture switch, the O= argument must be supported.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Both IMAGE and .config are from the building directory, let's use
> > > > > > > > objtree instead of srctree for them.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If no O= option specified, means building kernel in source code tree,
> > > > > > > > objtree should be srctree in such case.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
> > > > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZK0AB1OXH1s2xYsh@1wt.eu/
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 7 +++++--
> > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> > > > > > > > index 51fef5e6a152..af590aee063a 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> > > > > > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> > > > > > > > @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ ifeq ($(srctree),)
> > > > > > > > srctree := $(patsubst %/tools/testing/selftests/,%,$(dir $(CURDIR)))
> > > > > > > > endif
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +# add objtree for O= argument, required by IMAGE and .config
> > > > > > > > +objtree ?= $(srctree)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Isn't this already set by the included tools/scripts/Makefile.include?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Good question, but it is empty if no O= specified, checked it several
> > > > > > times before ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > > For me it is not empty when I am in tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Interesting, here is the code I added to check the value:
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> > > > index 22f1e1d73fa8..1ae19e896e24 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> > > > @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ include $(srctree)/scripts/subarch.include
> > > > ARCH = $(SUBARCH)
> > > > endif
> > > >
> > > > +$(error objtree=$(objtree), srctree=$(srctree))
> > > > +
> > > >
> > > > Whenever I do defconfig or run,
> > > >
> > > > $ make help
> > > > Makefile:15: *** objtree=, srctree=/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable. Stop.
> > > >
> > > > It is only not empty when we pass O explicitly:
> > > >
> > > > $ mkdir out
> > > > $ make help O=out
> > > > Makefile:15: *** objtree=out, srctree=/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable. Stop.
> > > > $ make help O=$PWD/out
> > > > Makefile:15: *** objtree=/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/out, srctree=/labs/linux-lab/src/linux-stable. Stop.
> > >
> > > Welp, now it's the same for me.
> > > I guess I messed it up before, maybe I forgot to remove your changes
> > > while testing?
> > >
> > > Anyways instead of having to manually do stuff with $(objtree) we could
> > > also use $(OUTPUT)$(IMAGE) to always get the correct image.
> > >
> >
> > Do you mean here?
> >
> > # kernel image names by architecture
> > IMAGE_i386 = arch/x86/boot/bzImage
> > IMAGE_x86 = arch/x86/boot/bzImage
> > IMAGE_arm64 = arch/arm64/boot/Image
> > IMAGE_arm = arch/arm/boot/zImage
> > IMAGE_mips = vmlinuz
> > IMAGE_riscv = arch/riscv/boot/Image
> > IMAGE = $(IMAGE_$(ARCH))
> > IMAGE_NAME = $(notdir $(IMAGE))
> >
> > It does save another KERNEL_IMAGE macro in my future patch ;-)
> >
> > But without O=, OUTPUT is also empty like objtree and when empty, it is
> > assigned as $(CURDIR), not $(srctree) as we expected for IMAGE and .config. To
> > be cleaner, objtree should also be used:
> >
> > - IMAGE = $(IMAGE_$(ARCH))
> > + IMAGE = $(objtree)/$(IMAGE_$(ARCH))
> >
> > Is this what you want?
>
> More like:
>
> - $(Q)qemu-system-$(QEMU_ARCH) -display none -no-reboot -kernel "$(srctree)/$(IMAGE)" -serial stdio $(QEMU_ARGS) > "$(CURDIR)/run.out"
> + $(Q)qemu-system-$(QEMU_ARCH) -display none -no-reboot -kernel "$(OUTPUT)$(IMAGE)" -serial stdio $(QEMU_ARGS) > "$(CURDIR)/run.out"
>
> My assumption was that it's weird that we need to define such variables
> ourselves.
>
> Using an empty $(OUTPUT) would have been fine if make is run from the
> root of the kernel tree. But that is not the case.
>
> It still feels weird but I can't think of a nicer way, and it's not
> a big issue. So let's keep that part the same.
>
> Or maybe Willy has a better idea.
I've just glanced over the discussion, but I'm wondering, why not
"$(objtree)/$(IMAGE)" instead ?
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-04 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-03 14:43 [PATCH v1 0/3] selftests/nolibc: add misc improvments Zhangjin Wu
2023-08-03 14:44 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] selftests/nolibc: allow report with existing test log Zhangjin Wu
2023-08-04 15:30 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-08-03 14:45 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] selftests/nolibc: fix up O= option support Zhangjin Wu
2023-08-04 6:25 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-08-04 7:43 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-08-04 15:05 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-08-04 15:52 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-08-04 16:02 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-08-04 16:29 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-08-04 17:51 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-08-04 17:54 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2023-08-04 18:40 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-08-04 18:43 ` Willy Tarreau
2023-08-04 19:17 ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-08-03 14:47 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] tools/nolibc: stackprotector.h: make __stack_chk_init static Zhangjin Wu
2023-08-04 15:38 ` Thomas Weißschuh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230804175429.GC31163@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=falcon@tinylab.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tanyuan@tinylab.org \
--cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox