From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Support ROHM BU27010 RGBC sensor
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2023 19:48:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230805194815.09e1dfb4@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1690958450.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 10:35:55 +0300
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> wrote:
> Support ROHM BU27010 RGBC + flickering sensor.
>
> Following description copied from commit log:
>
> > The ROHM BU27010 is an RGBC sensor with a flickering detection FIFO. The
> > RGBC+IR sensor functionality is largely similar to what the BU27008 has.
> > There are some notable things though:
> > - gain setting is once again new and exotic. Now, there is 6bit gain
> > setting where 4 of the bits are common to all channels and 2 bits
> > can be configured separately for each channel. The BU27010 has
> > similar "1X on other channels vs 2X on IR when selector is 0x0"
> > gain design as BU27008 had. So, we use same gain setting policy for
> > BU27010 as we did for BU27008 - driver sets same gain selector for
> > all channels but shows the gains separately for all channels so users
> > can (at least in theory) detect this 1X vs 2X madness...
> > - BU27010 has suffled all the control register bitfields to new
> > addresses and bit positions while still keeping the register naming
> > same.
> > - Some more power/reset control is added.
> > - FIFO for "flickering detection" is added.
> >
> > The control register suffling made this slightly nasty. Still, it is
> > easier for maintenance perspective to add the BU27010 support in BU27008
> > driver because - even though the bit positions/addresses were changed -
> > most of the driver structure can be re-used. Writing own driver for
> > BU27010 would mean plenty of duplicate code albeit a tad more clarity.
>
> Revision history:
>
> v2 => v3:
> - minor styling and added comment
> - rebased on iio-fixes-for-6.5a which contains prerequisite patches
> v1 => v2:
> - make vdd-supply required binding.
> - Some re-ordering for struct member init.
> - Some re-ordering for code to get rid of function declarations.
> - Tidy up the mess from patch 2/3.
> - Refactor parts from 3/3 to 2/3.
> - Clean-up commented out code and tidy things in general.
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for 0-day
to poke at it and see if we missed anything in review.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
>
> ---
>
> Matti Vaittinen (3):
> dt-bindings: iio: ROHM BU27010 RGBC + flickering sensor
> iio: light: bu27008: add chip info
> iio: light: bd27008: Support BD27010 RGB
>
> .../bindings/iio/light/rohm,bu27010.yaml | 49 ++
> drivers/iio/light/rohm-bu27008.c | 630 ++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 565 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/rohm,bu27010.yaml
>
>
> base-commit: 8a4629055ef55177b5b63dab1ecce676bd8cccdd
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-05 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-02 7:35 [PATCH v3 0/3] Support ROHM BU27010 RGBC sensor Matti Vaittinen
2023-08-02 7:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: ROHM BU27010 RGBC + flickering sensor Matti Vaittinen
2023-08-02 7:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] iio: light: bu27008: add chip info Matti Vaittinen
2023-08-02 7:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] iio: light: bd27008: Support BD27010 RGB Matti Vaittinen
2023-08-05 18:48 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230805194815.09e1dfb4@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox