public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com>,
	Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
	Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>
Subject: [patch 31/53] x86/cpu/topology: Confine topology information
Date: Mon,  7 Aug 2023 15:53:22 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230807135028.056840782@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20230807130108.853357011@linutronix.de

Now that all external fiddling with num_processors and disabled_cpus is
gone, move the last user prefill_possible_map() into the topology code too
and remove the global visibility of these variables.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h          |    3 -
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c         |    1 
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c |   76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c           |   72 ----------------------------------
 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
 #include <asm/thread_info.h>
 
 extern int smp_num_siblings;
-extern unsigned int num_processors;
 
 DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_sibling_map);
 DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_core_map);
@@ -178,8 +177,6 @@ static inline struct cpumask *cpu_llc_sh
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
-extern unsigned disabled_cpus;
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NMI_SELFTEST
 extern void nmi_selftest(void);
 #else
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -2054,7 +2054,6 @@ void __init init_apic_mappings(void)
 			pr_info("APIC: disable apic facility\n");
 			apic_disable();
 		}
-		num_processors = 1;
 	}
 }
 
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
@@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ u32 cpuid_to_apicid[] __read_mostly = {
  */
 static u32 disabled_cpu_apicid __ro_after_init = BAD_APICID;
 
-unsigned int num_processors;
-unsigned disabled_cpus;
+static unsigned int num_processors;
+static unsigned int disabled_cpus;
 
 /*
  * The number of allocated logical CPU IDs. Since logical CPU IDs are allocated
@@ -169,6 +169,71 @@ static int generic_processor_info(int ap
 	return cpu;
 }
 
+static int __initdata setup_possible_cpus = -1;
+
+/*
+ * cpu_possible_mask should be static, it cannot change as cpu's
+ * are onlined, or offlined. The reason is per-cpu data-structures
+ * are allocated by some modules at init time, and don't expect to
+ * do this dynamically on cpu arrival/departure.
+ * cpu_present_mask on the other hand can change dynamically.
+ * In case when cpu_hotplug is not compiled, then we resort to current
+ * behaviour, which is cpu_possible == cpu_present.
+ * - Ashok Raj
+ *
+ * Three ways to find out the number of additional hotplug CPUs:
+ * - If the BIOS specified disabled CPUs in ACPI/mptables use that.
+ * - The user can overwrite it with possible_cpus=NUM
+ * - Otherwise don't reserve additional CPUs.
+ * We do this because additional CPUs waste a lot of memory.
+ * -AK
+ */
+__init void prefill_possible_map(void)
+{
+	int i, possible;
+
+	i = setup_max_cpus ?: 1;
+	if (setup_possible_cpus == -1) {
+		possible = num_processors;
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+		if (setup_max_cpus)
+			possible += disabled_cpus;
+#else
+		if (possible > i)
+			possible = i;
+#endif
+	} else
+		possible = setup_possible_cpus;
+
+	total_cpus = max_t(int, possible, num_processors + disabled_cpus);
+
+	/* nr_cpu_ids could be reduced via nr_cpus= */
+	if (possible > nr_cpu_ids) {
+		pr_warn("%d Processors exceeds NR_CPUS limit of %u\n",
+			possible, nr_cpu_ids);
+		possible = nr_cpu_ids;
+	}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+	if (!setup_max_cpus)
+#endif
+	if (possible > i) {
+		pr_warn("%d Processors exceeds max_cpus limit of %u\n",
+			possible, setup_max_cpus);
+		possible = i;
+	}
+
+	set_nr_cpu_ids(possible);
+
+	pr_info("Allowing %d CPUs, %d hotplug CPUs\n",
+		possible, max_t(int, possible - num_processors, 0));
+
+	reset_cpu_possible_mask();
+
+	for (i = 0; i < possible; i++)
+		set_cpu_possible(i, true);
+}
+
 /**
  * topology_register_apic - Register an APIC in early topology maps
  * @apic_id:	The APIC ID to set up
@@ -246,6 +311,13 @@ void topology_hotunplug_apic(unsigned in
 }
 #endif
 
+static int __init _setup_possible_cpus(char *str)
+{
+	get_option(&str, &setup_possible_cpus);
+	return 0;
+}
+early_param("possible_cpus", _setup_possible_cpus);
+
 static int __init apic_set_disabled_cpu_apicid(char *arg)
 {
 	if (!arg || !get_option(&arg, &disabled_cpu_apicid))
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1327,78 +1327,6 @@ void __init native_smp_cpus_done(unsigne
 	cache_aps_init();
 }
 
-static int __initdata setup_possible_cpus = -1;
-static int __init _setup_possible_cpus(char *str)
-{
-	get_option(&str, &setup_possible_cpus);
-	return 0;
-}
-early_param("possible_cpus", _setup_possible_cpus);
-
-
-/*
- * cpu_possible_mask should be static, it cannot change as cpu's
- * are onlined, or offlined. The reason is per-cpu data-structures
- * are allocated by some modules at init time, and don't expect to
- * do this dynamically on cpu arrival/departure.
- * cpu_present_mask on the other hand can change dynamically.
- * In case when cpu_hotplug is not compiled, then we resort to current
- * behaviour, which is cpu_possible == cpu_present.
- * - Ashok Raj
- *
- * Three ways to find out the number of additional hotplug CPUs:
- * - If the BIOS specified disabled CPUs in ACPI/mptables use that.
- * - The user can overwrite it with possible_cpus=NUM
- * - Otherwise don't reserve additional CPUs.
- * We do this because additional CPUs waste a lot of memory.
- * -AK
- */
-__init void prefill_possible_map(void)
-{
-	int i, possible;
-
-	i = setup_max_cpus ?: 1;
-	if (setup_possible_cpus == -1) {
-		possible = num_processors;
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
-		if (setup_max_cpus)
-			possible += disabled_cpus;
-#else
-		if (possible > i)
-			possible = i;
-#endif
-	} else
-		possible = setup_possible_cpus;
-
-	total_cpus = max_t(int, possible, num_processors + disabled_cpus);
-
-	/* nr_cpu_ids could be reduced via nr_cpus= */
-	if (possible > nr_cpu_ids) {
-		pr_warn("%d Processors exceeds NR_CPUS limit of %u\n",
-			possible, nr_cpu_ids);
-		possible = nr_cpu_ids;
-	}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
-	if (!setup_max_cpus)
-#endif
-	if (possible > i) {
-		pr_warn("%d Processors exceeds max_cpus limit of %u\n",
-			possible, setup_max_cpus);
-		possible = i;
-	}
-
-	set_nr_cpu_ids(possible);
-
-	pr_info("Allowing %d CPUs, %d hotplug CPUs\n",
-		possible, max_t(int, possible - num_processors, 0));
-
-	reset_cpu_possible_mask();
-
-	for (i = 0; i < possible; i++)
-		set_cpu_possible(i, true);
-}
-
 /* correctly size the local cpu masks */
 void __init setup_cpu_local_masks(void)
 {


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-07 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-07 13:52 [patch 00/53] x86/topology: The final installment Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 01/53] x86/cpu/topology: Cure off by one in fake_topology() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 02/53] x86/cpu/topology: Make the APIC mismatch warnings complete Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 14:28   ` Arjan van de Ven
2023-08-07 14:54     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 03/53] x86/platform/ce4100: Dont override x86_init.mpparse.setup_ioapic_ids Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 15:20   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 04/53] x86/ioapic: Replace some more set bit nonsense Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 05/53] x86/apic: Get rid of get_physical_broadcast() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 15:24   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 06/53] x86/ioapic: Make io_apic_get_unique_id() simpler Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 07/53] x86/ioapic: Simplify setup_ioapic_ids_from_mpc_nocheck() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 08/53] x86/apic: Remove check_apicid_used() and ioapic_phys_id_map() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 09/53] x86/mpparse: Rename default_find_smp_config() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 16:03   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-07 17:21     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 10/53] x86/mpparse: Provide separate early/late callbacks Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 11/53] x86/mpparse: Prepare for callback separation Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 12/53] x86/dtb: Rename x86_dtb_init() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 13/53] x86/platform/ce4100: Prepare for separate mpparse callbacks Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 14/53] x86/platform/intel-mid: " Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 16:07   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 15/53] x86/jailhouse: " Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:52 ` [patch 16/53] x86/xen/smp_pv: " Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 17/53] x86/mpparse: Switch to new init callbacks Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 18/53] x86/mm/numa: Move early mptable evaluation into common code Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 19/53] x86/mpparse: Remove the physid_t bitmap wrapper Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-08 11:37   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 20/53] x86/apic: Remove the pointless writeback of boot_cpu_physical_apicid Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 21/53] x86/apic: Remove yet another dubious callback Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 22/53] x86/apic: Use a proper define for invalid ACPI CPU ID Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 23/53] x86/cpu/topology: Move registration out of APIC code Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 24/53] x86/cpu/topology: Provide separate APIC registration functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11 12:32   ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 25/53] x86/acpi: Use new " Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 15:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-07 15:35     ` Andrew Cooper
2023-08-07 15:41     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 26/53] x86/jailhouse: Use new APIC registration function Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 27/53] x86/of: Use new APIC registration functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 28/53] x86/mpparse: Use new APIC registration function Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 29/53] x86/acpi: Dont invoke topology_register_apic() for XEN PV Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 30/53] x86/xen/smp_pv: Register fake APICs Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 32/53] x86/cpu/topology: Simplify APIC registration Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 33/53] x86/cpu/topology: Use a data structure for topology info Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 34/53] x86/smpboot: Make error message actually useful Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 35/53] x86/cpu/topology: Sanitize the APIC admission logic Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 36/53] x86/cpu/topology: Rework possible CPU management Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-14  8:29   ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 37/53] x86/cpu: Detect real BSP on crash kernels Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-08 14:11   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-01-08 14:54     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-08 16:13       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-09  1:54         ` Zhang, Rui
2024-01-10 14:19           ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-10 15:14             ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-11  1:52               ` Zhang, Rui
2024-01-12  9:14               ` Zhang, Rui
2024-01-12 15:39                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-13  7:35                   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-01-15  9:41                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 38/53] x86/topology: Add a mechanism to track topology via APIC IDs Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 39/53] x86/cpu/topology: Reject unknown APIC IDs on ACPI hotplug Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 40/53] x86/cpu/topology: Assign hotpluggable CPUIDs during init Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 41/53] x86/xen/smp_pv: Count number of vCPUs early Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 42/53] x86/cpu/topology: Let XEN/PV use topology from CPUID/MADT Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 43/53] x86/cpu/topology: Use topology bitmaps for sizing Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 44/53] x86/cpu/topology: Mop up primary thread mask handling Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 45/53] x86/cpu/topology: Simplify cpu_mark_primary_thread() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 46/53] x86/cpu/topology: Provide logical pkg/die mapping Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 47/53] x86/cpu/topology: Use topology logical mapping mechanism Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 48/53] x86/cpu/topology: Retrieve cores per package from topology bitmaps Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 49/53] x86: Use topology functions instead of smp_num_siblings where applicable Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 50/53] x86/cpu/topology: Rename smp_num_siblings Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 51/53] x86/cpu/topology: Rename topology_max_die_per_package() Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 52/53] x86/cpu/topology: Provide __num_[cores|threads]_per_package Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-07 13:53 ` [patch 53/53] x86/cpu/topology: Get rid of cpuinfo::x86_max_cores Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-11 15:44   ` Zhang, Rui
2023-12-14 14:00   ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-08  7:40 ` [patch 00/53] x86/topology: The final installment Juergen Gross
2023-08-08 11:20   ` Andrew Cooper
2023-08-08 18:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-08 18:29 ` Sohil Mehta
2023-08-08 19:10   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-08 20:30     ` Sohil Mehta
2023-08-08 20:41       ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-08 22:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-08 22:58           ` Sohil Mehta
2023-08-08 23:20             ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-09 16:55               ` Sohil Mehta
2023-08-10  3:28               ` Zhang, Rui
2023-08-09 16:50             ` Qiuxu Zhuo
2023-08-09 17:23               ` Sohil Mehta
2023-08-10  1:33                 ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2023-08-08 20:57       ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-09 16:12 ` Qiuxu Zhuo
2023-08-12 13:51 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230807135028.056840782@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dimitri.sivanich@hpe.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox