[PATCH v4 0/9] drm/msm+PM+icc: Make job_run() reclaim-safe

[PATCH v4 0/9] drm/msm+PM+icc: Make job_run() reclaim-safe

[Rob Clark]

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

Inspired by https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20200604081224.863494-10-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch/
it seemed like a good idea to get rid of memory allocation in job_run()
fence signaling path, and use lockdep annotations to yell at us about
anything that could deadlock against shrinker/reclaim.  Anything that
can trigger reclaim, or block on any other thread that has triggered
reclaim, can block the GPU shrinker from releasing memory if it is
waiting the job to complete, causing deadlock.

The first two patches decouple allocation from devfreq->lock, and teach
lockdep that devfreq->lock can be acquired in paths that the shrinker
indirectly depends on.

The next three patches do the same for PM QoS.  And the next two do a
similar thing for interconnect.

And then finally the last two patches enable the lockdep fence-
signalling annotations.


v2: Switch from embedding hw_fence in submit/job object to preallocating
    the hw_fence.  Rework "fenced unpin" locking to drop obj lock from
    fence signaling path (ie. the part that was still WIP in the first
    iteration of the patchset).  Adds the final patch to enable fence
    signaling annotations now that job_run() and job_free() are safe.
    The PM devfreq/QoS and interconnect patches are unchanged.

v3: Mostly unchanged, but series is much smaller now that drm changes
    have landed, mostly consisting of the remaining devfreq/qos/
    interconnect fixes.

v4: Re-work PM / QoS patch based on Rafael's suggestion

Rob Clark (9):
  PM / devfreq: Drop unneed locking to appease lockdep
  PM / devfreq: Teach lockdep about locking order
  PM / QoS: Fix constraints alloc vs reclaim locking
  PM / QoS: Decouple request alloc from dev_pm_qos_mtx
  PM / QoS: Teach lockdep about dev_pm_qos_mtx locking order
  interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim
  interconnect: Teach lockdep about icc_bw_lock order
  drm/sched: Add (optional) fence signaling annotation
  drm/msm: Enable fence signalling annotations

 drivers/base/power/qos.c               | 98 +++++++++++++++++++-------
 drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c              | 52 +++++++-------
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c   |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c |  9 +++
 drivers/interconnect/core.c            | 18 ++++-
 include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h            |  2 +
 6 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v4 1/9] PM / devfreq: Drop unneed locking to appease lockdep

[Rob Clark]

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

In the process of adding lockdep annotation for GPU job_run() path to
catch potential deadlocks against the shrinker/reclaim path, I turned
up this lockdep splat:

   ======================================================
   WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
   6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #556 Not tainted
   ------------------------------------------------------
   ring0/123 is trying to acquire lock:
   ffffff8087219078 (&devfreq->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devfreq_monitor_resume+0x3c/0xf0

   but task is already holding lock:
   ffffffd6f64e57e8 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: msm_job_run+0x68/0x150

   which lock already depends on the new lock.

   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

   -> #3 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}:
          __dma_fence_might_wait+0x74/0xc0
          dma_resv_lockdep+0x1f4/0x2f4
          do_one_initcall+0x104/0x2bc
          kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x34c
          kernel_init+0x30/0x134
          ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

   -> #2 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}:
          fs_reclaim_acquire+0x80/0xa8
          slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c
          __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc
          __kmalloc+0xd8/0x100
          topology_parse_cpu_capacity+0x8c/0x178
          get_cpu_for_node+0x88/0xc4
          parse_cluster+0x1b0/0x28c
          parse_cluster+0x8c/0x28c
          init_cpu_topology+0x168/0x188
          smp_prepare_cpus+0x24/0xf8
          kernel_init_freeable+0x18c/0x34c
          kernel_init+0x30/0x134
          ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

   -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
          __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x3c/0x48
          fs_reclaim_acquire+0x54/0xa8
          slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c
          __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc
          __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0xb8/0xe0
          kstrdup+0x70/0x90
          kstrdup_const+0x38/0x48
          kvasprintf_const+0x48/0xbc
          kobject_set_name_vargs+0x40/0xb0
          dev_set_name+0x64/0x8c
          devfreq_add_device+0x31c/0x55c
          devm_devfreq_add_device+0x6c/0xb8
          msm_devfreq_init+0xa8/0x16c
          msm_gpu_init+0x38c/0x570
          adreno_gpu_init+0x1b4/0x2b4
          a6xx_gpu_init+0x15c/0x3e4
          adreno_bind+0x218/0x254
          component_bind_all+0x114/0x1ec
          msm_drm_bind+0x2b8/0x608
          try_to_bring_up_aggregate_device+0x88/0x1a4
          __component_add+0xec/0x13c
          component_add+0x1c/0x28
          dsi_dev_attach+0x28/0x34
          dsi_host_attach+0xdc/0x124
          mipi_dsi_attach+0x30/0x44
          devm_mipi_dsi_attach+0x2c/0x70
          ti_sn_bridge_probe+0x298/0x2c4
          auxiliary_bus_probe+0x7c/0x94
          really_probe+0x158/0x290
          __driver_probe_device+0xc8/0xe0
          driver_probe_device+0x44/0x100
          __device_attach_driver+0x64/0xdc
          bus_for_each_drv+0xa0/0xc8
          __device_attach+0xd8/0x168
          device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28
          bus_probe_device+0x38/0xa0
          deferred_probe_work_func+0xc8/0xe0
          process_one_work+0x2d8/0x478
          process_scheduled_works+0x4c/0x50
          worker_thread+0x218/0x274
          kthread+0xf0/0x100
          ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

   -> #0 (&devfreq->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
          __lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060
          lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8
          __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8
          mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44
          devfreq_monitor_resume+0x3c/0xf0
          devfreq_simple_ondemand_handler+0x54/0x7c
          devfreq_resume_device+0xa4/0xe8
          msm_devfreq_resume+0x78/0xa8
          a6xx_pm_resume+0x110/0x234
          adreno_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x38
          pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x30/0x44
          __rpm_callback+0x15c/0x174
          rpm_callback+0x78/0x7c
          rpm_resume+0x318/0x524
          __pm_runtime_resume+0x78/0xbc
          pm_runtime_get_sync.isra.0+0x14/0x20
          msm_gpu_submit+0x58/0x178
          msm_job_run+0x78/0x150
          drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370
          kthread+0xf0/0x100
          ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

   other info that might help us debug this:

   Chain exists of:
     &devfreq->lock --> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start --> dma_fence_map

    Possible unsafe locking scenario:

          CPU0                    CPU1
          ----                    ----
     lock(dma_fence_map);
                                  lock(mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start);
                                  lock(dma_fence_map);
     lock(&devfreq->lock);

    *** DEADLOCK ***

   2 locks held by ring0/123:
    #0: ffffff8087201170 (&gpu->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_job_run+0x64/0x150
    #1: ffffffd6f64e57e8 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: msm_job_run+0x68/0x150

   stack backtrace:
   CPU: 6 PID: 123 Comm: ring0 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #556
   Hardware name: Google Lazor (rev1 - 2) with LTE (DT)
   Call trace:
    dump_backtrace.part.0+0xb4/0xf8
    show_stack+0x20/0x38
    dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xd0
    dump_stack+0x18/0x34
    print_circular_bug+0x1b4/0x1f0
    check_noncircular+0x78/0xac
    __lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060
    lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8
    __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8
    mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44
    devfreq_monitor_resume+0x3c/0xf0
    devfreq_simple_ondemand_handler+0x54/0x7c
    devfreq_resume_device+0xa4/0xe8
    msm_devfreq_resume+0x78/0xa8
    a6xx_pm_resume+0x110/0x234
    adreno_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x38
    pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x30/0x44
    __rpm_callback+0x15c/0x174
    rpm_callback+0x78/0x7c
    rpm_resume+0x318/0x524
    __pm_runtime_resume+0x78/0xbc
    pm_runtime_get_sync.isra.0+0x14/0x20
    msm_gpu_submit+0x58/0x178
    msm_job_run+0x78/0x150
    drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370
    kthread+0xf0/0x100
    ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

The issue is that we cannot be holding any lock while doing memory
allocations that is also needed in the job_run (and in the case of
devfreq, this means runpm_resume()) because lockdep sees this as a
potential dependency.

Fortunately there is really no reason to hold the devfreq lock when
we are creating the devfreq device, as it is not yet visible to any
other task.  The only reason it was needed was for a lockdep assert
in devfreq_get_freq_range().  Instead, split this up into an internal
fxn that is used in the devfreq_add_device() (where the lock is not
required).

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
index e36cbb920ec8..e5558ec68ce8 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
@@ -111,23 +111,13 @@ static unsigned long find_available_max_freq(struct devfreq *devfreq)
 	return max_freq;
 }
 
-/**
- * devfreq_get_freq_range() - Get the current freq range
- * @devfreq:	the devfreq instance
- * @min_freq:	the min frequency
- * @max_freq:	the max frequency
- *
- * This takes into consideration all constraints.
- */
-void devfreq_get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq,
-			    unsigned long *min_freq,
-			    unsigned long *max_freq)
+static void __get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq,
+			     unsigned long *min_freq,
+			     unsigned long *max_freq)
 {
 	unsigned long *freq_table = devfreq->freq_table;
 	s32 qos_min_freq, qos_max_freq;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&devfreq->lock);
-
 	/*
 	 * Initialize minimum/maximum frequency from freq table.
 	 * The devfreq drivers can initialize this in either ascending or
@@ -158,6 +148,23 @@ void devfreq_get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq,
 	if (*min_freq > *max_freq)
 		*min_freq = *max_freq;
 }
+
+/**
+ * devfreq_get_freq_range() - Get the current freq range
+ * @devfreq:	the devfreq instance
+ * @min_freq:	the min frequency
+ * @max_freq:	the max frequency
+ *
+ * This takes into consideration all constraints.
+ */
+void devfreq_get_freq_range(struct devfreq *devfreq,
+			    unsigned long *min_freq,
+			    unsigned long *max_freq)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&devfreq->lock);
+
+	__get_freq_range(devfreq, min_freq, max_freq);
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(devfreq_get_freq_range);
 
 /**
@@ -810,7 +817,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
 	}
 
 	mutex_init(&devfreq->lock);
-	mutex_lock(&devfreq->lock);
 	devfreq->dev.parent = dev;
 	devfreq->dev.class = devfreq_class;
 	devfreq->dev.release = devfreq_dev_release;
@@ -823,17 +829,14 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
 
 	if (devfreq->profile->timer < 0
 		|| devfreq->profile->timer >= DEVFREQ_TIMER_NUM) {
-		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto err_dev;
 	}
 
 	if (!devfreq->profile->max_state || !devfreq->profile->freq_table) {
-		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
 		err = set_freq_table(devfreq);
 		if (err < 0)
 			goto err_dev;
-		mutex_lock(&devfreq->lock);
 	} else {
 		devfreq->freq_table = devfreq->profile->freq_table;
 		devfreq->max_state = devfreq->profile->max_state;
@@ -841,19 +844,17 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
 
 	devfreq->scaling_min_freq = find_available_min_freq(devfreq);
 	if (!devfreq->scaling_min_freq) {
-		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto err_dev;
 	}
 
 	devfreq->scaling_max_freq = find_available_max_freq(devfreq);
 	if (!devfreq->scaling_max_freq) {
-		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto err_dev;
 	}
 
-	devfreq_get_freq_range(devfreq, &min_freq, &max_freq);
+	__get_freq_range(devfreq, &min_freq, &max_freq);
 
 	devfreq->suspend_freq = dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq(dev);
 	devfreq->opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
@@ -865,7 +866,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
 	dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "%s", dev_name(dev));
 	err = device_register(&devfreq->dev);
 	if (err) {
-		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
 		put_device(&devfreq->dev);
 		goto err_out;
 	}
@@ -876,7 +876,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
 				    devfreq->max_state),
 			GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!devfreq->stats.trans_table) {
-		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto err_devfreq;
 	}
@@ -886,7 +885,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
 			sizeof(*devfreq->stats.time_in_state),
 			GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!devfreq->stats.time_in_state) {
-		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto err_devfreq;
 	}
@@ -896,8 +894,6 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
 
 	srcu_init_notifier_head(&devfreq->transition_notifier_list);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
-
 	err = dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev, &devfreq->user_min_freq_req,
 				     DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY, 0);
 	if (err < 0)
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v4 2/9] PM / devfreq: Teach lockdep about locking order

[Rob Clark]

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

This will make it easier to catch places doing allocations that can
trigger reclaim under devfreq->lock.

Because devfreq->lock is held over various devfreq_dev_profile
callbacks, there might be some fallout if those callbacks do allocations
that can trigger reclaim, but I've looked through the various callback
implementations and don't see anything obvious.  If it does trigger any
lockdep splats, those should be fixed.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
index e5558ec68ce8..81add6064406 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
@@ -817,6 +817,12 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
 	}
 
 	mutex_init(&devfreq->lock);
+
+	/* Teach lockdep about lock ordering wrt. shrinker: */
+	fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
+	might_lock(&devfreq->lock);
+	fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
+
 	devfreq->dev.parent = dev;
 	devfreq->dev.class = devfreq_class;
 	devfreq->dev.release = devfreq_dev_release;
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v4 3/9] PM / QoS: Fix constraints alloc vs reclaim locking

[Rob Clark]

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

In the process of adding lockdep annotation for drm GPU scheduler's
job_run() to detect potential deadlock against shrinker/reclaim, I hit
this lockdep splat:

   ======================================================
   WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
   6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #558 Tainted: G        W
   ------------------------------------------------------
   ring0/125 is trying to acquire lock:
   ffffffd6d6ce0f28 (dev_pm_qos_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x38/0x68

   but task is already holding lock:
   ffffff8087239208 (&gpu->active_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_gpu_submit+0xec/0x178

   which lock already depends on the new lock.

   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

   -> #4 (&gpu->active_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
          __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8
          mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44
          msm_gpu_submit+0xec/0x178
          msm_job_run+0x78/0x150
          drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370
          kthread+0xf0/0x100
          ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

   -> #3 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}:
          __dma_fence_might_wait+0x74/0xc0
          dma_resv_lockdep+0x1f4/0x2f4
          do_one_initcall+0x104/0x2bc
          kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x34c
          kernel_init+0x30/0x134
          ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

   -> #2 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}:
          fs_reclaim_acquire+0x80/0xa8
          slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c
          __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc
          __kmalloc+0xd8/0x100
          topology_parse_cpu_capacity+0x8c/0x178
          get_cpu_for_node+0x88/0xc4
          parse_cluster+0x1b0/0x28c
          parse_cluster+0x8c/0x28c
          init_cpu_topology+0x168/0x188
          smp_prepare_cpus+0x24/0xf8
          kernel_init_freeable+0x18c/0x34c
          kernel_init+0x30/0x134
          ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

   -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
          __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x3c/0x48
          fs_reclaim_acquire+0x54/0xa8
          slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c
          __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc
          kmalloc_trace+0x50/0xa8
          dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate+0x38/0x100
          __dev_pm_qos_add_request+0xb0/0x1e8
          dev_pm_qos_add_request+0x58/0x80
          dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit+0x60/0x13c
          register_cpu+0x12c/0x130
          topology_init+0xac/0xbc
          do_one_initcall+0x104/0x2bc
          kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x34c
          kernel_init+0x30/0x134
          ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

   -> #0 (dev_pm_qos_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}:
          __lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060
          lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8
          __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8
          mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44
          dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x38/0x68
          msm_devfreq_boost+0x40/0x70
          msm_devfreq_active+0xc0/0xf0
          msm_gpu_submit+0x10c/0x178
          msm_job_run+0x78/0x150
          drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370
          kthread+0xf0/0x100
          ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

   other info that might help us debug this:

   Chain exists of:
     dev_pm_qos_mtx --> dma_fence_map --> &gpu->active_lock

    Possible unsafe locking scenario:

          CPU0                    CPU1
          ----                    ----
     lock(&gpu->active_lock);
                                  lock(dma_fence_map);
                                  lock(&gpu->active_lock);
     lock(dev_pm_qos_mtx);

    *** DEADLOCK ***

   3 locks held by ring0/123:
    #0: ffffff8087251170 (&gpu->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_job_run+0x64/0x150
    #1: ffffffd00b0e57e8 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: msm_job_run+0x68/0x150
    #2: ffffff8087251208 (&gpu->active_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_gpu_submit+0xec/0x178

   stack backtrace:
   CPU: 6 PID: 123 Comm: ring0 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #559
   Hardware name: Google Lazor (rev1 - 2) with LTE (DT)
   Call trace:
    dump_backtrace.part.0+0xb4/0xf8
    show_stack+0x20/0x38
    dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xd0
    dump_stack+0x18/0x34
    print_circular_bug+0x1b4/0x1f0
    check_noncircular+0x78/0xac
    __lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060
    lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8
    __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8
    mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44
    dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x38/0x68
    msm_devfreq_boost+0x40/0x70
    msm_devfreq_active+0xc0/0xf0
    msm_gpu_submit+0x10c/0x178
    msm_job_run+0x78/0x150
    drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370
    kthread+0xf0/0x100
    ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

The issue is that dev_pm_qos_mtx is held in the runpm suspend/resume (or
freq change) path, but it is also held across allocations that could
recurse into shrinker.

Solve this by changing dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate() into a function
that can be called unconditionally before the device qos object is
needed and before aquiring dev_pm_qos_mtx.  This way the allocations can
be done without holding the mutex.  In the case that we raced with
another thread to allocate the qos object, detect this *after* acquiring
the dev_pm_qos_mtx and simply free the redundant allocations.

Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
One small change from the RFC[1], it skips the allocation if
dev->power.qos is already allocated.  Since this is only freed on
device removal, it seems safe to rely on not seeing a !null to null
transition.

[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/551436/?series=122056&rev=1

 drivers/base/power/qos.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/qos.c b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
index 8e93167f1783..7e95760d16dc 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/qos.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
@@ -185,27 +185,33 @@ static int apply_constraint(struct dev_pm_qos_request *req,
 }
 
 /*
- * dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate
+ * dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate: Allocate and initializes qos constraints
  * @dev: device to allocate data for
  *
- * Called at the first call to add_request, for constraint data allocation
- * Must be called with the dev_pm_qos_mtx mutex held
+ * Called to allocate constraints before dev_pm_qos_mtx mutex is held.  Should
+ * be matched with a call to dev_pm_qos_constraints_set() once dev_pm_qos_mtx
+ * is held.
  */
-static int dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(struct device *dev)
+static struct dev_pm_qos *dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct dev_pm_qos *qos;
 	struct pm_qos_constraints *c;
 	struct blocking_notifier_head *n;
 
-	qos = kzalloc(sizeof(*qos), GFP_KERNEL);
+	/*
+	 * If constraints are already allocated, we can skip speculatively
+	 * allocating a new one, as we don't have to work about qos transitioning
+	 * from non-null to null.  The constraints are only freed on device
+	 * removal.
+	 */
+	if (dev->power.qos)
+		return NULL;
+
+	qos = kzalloc(sizeof(*qos) + 3 * sizeof(*n), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!qos)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		return NULL;
 
-	n = kzalloc(3 * sizeof(*n), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!n) {
-		kfree(qos);
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
+	n = (struct blocking_notifier_head *)(qos + 1);
 
 	c = &qos->resume_latency;
 	plist_head_init(&c->list);
@@ -227,11 +233,29 @@ static int dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(struct device *dev)
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&qos->flags.list);
 
+	return qos;
+}
+
+/*
+ * dev_pm_qos_constraints_set: Ensure dev->power.qos is set
+ *
+ * If dev->power.qos is already set, free the newly allocated qos constraints.
+ * Otherwise set dev->power.qos.  Must be called with dev_pm_qos_mtx held.
+ *
+ * This split unsynchronized allocation and synchronized set moves allocation
+ * out from under dev_pm_qos_mtx, so that lockdep does does not get angry about
+ * drivers which use dev_pm_qos in paths related to shrinker/reclaim.
+ */
+static void dev_pm_qos_constraints_set(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_qos *qos)
+{
+	if (dev->power.qos) {
+		kfree(qos);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
 	dev->power.qos = qos;
 	spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 static void __dev_pm_qos_hide_latency_limit(struct device *dev);
@@ -309,7 +333,6 @@ void dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy(struct device *dev)
 	dev->power.qos = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
 
-	kfree(qos->resume_latency.notifiers);
 	kfree(qos);
 
  out:
@@ -341,7 +364,7 @@ static int __dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device *dev,
 	if (IS_ERR(dev->power.qos))
 		ret = -ENODEV;
 	else if (!dev->power.qos)
-		ret = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev);
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
 
 	trace_dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev_name(dev), type, value);
 	if (ret)
@@ -388,9 +411,11 @@ static int __dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device *dev,
 int dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_qos_request *req,
 			   enum dev_pm_qos_req_type type, s32 value)
 {
+	struct dev_pm_qos *qos = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev);
 	int ret;
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
+	dev_pm_qos_constraints_set(dev, qos);
 	ret = __dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev, req, type, value);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
 	return ret;
@@ -535,14 +560,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_qos_remove_request);
 int dev_pm_qos_add_notifier(struct device *dev, struct notifier_block *notifier,
 			    enum dev_pm_qos_req_type type)
 {
+	struct dev_pm_qos *qos = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev);
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
 
+	dev_pm_qos_constraints_set(dev, qos);
+
 	if (IS_ERR(dev->power.qos))
 		ret = -ENODEV;
-	else if (!dev->power.qos)
-		ret = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev);
 
 	if (ret)
 		goto unlock;
@@ -903,12 +929,22 @@ s32 dev_pm_qos_get_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev)
  */
 int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val)
 {
-	int ret;
+	struct dev_pm_qos *qos = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev);
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
 
-	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->power.qos)
-	    || !dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req) {
+	dev_pm_qos_constraints_set(dev, qos);
+
+	if (IS_ERR(dev->power.qos))
+		ret = -ENODEV;
+	else if (!dev->power.qos)
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (!dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req) {
 		struct dev_pm_qos_request *req;
 
 		if (val < 0) {
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v4 4/9] PM / QoS: Decouple request alloc from dev_pm_qos_mtx

[Rob Clark]

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

Similar to the previous patch, move the allocation out from under
dev_pm_qos_mtx, by speculatively doing the allocation and handle
any race after acquiring dev_pm_qos_mtx by freeing the redundant
allocation.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/base/power/qos.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/qos.c b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
index 7e95760d16dc..5ec06585b6d1 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/qos.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
@@ -930,8 +930,12 @@ s32 dev_pm_qos_get_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev)
 int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val)
 {
 	struct dev_pm_qos *qos = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev);
+	struct dev_pm_qos_request *req = NULL;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	if (!dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req)
+		req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL);
+
 	mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
 
 	dev_pm_qos_constraints_set(dev, qos);
@@ -945,8 +949,6 @@ int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val)
 		goto out;
 
 	if (!dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req) {
-		struct dev_pm_qos_request *req;
-
 		if (val < 0) {
 			if (val == PM_QOS_LATENCY_TOLERANCE_NO_CONSTRAINT)
 				ret = 0;
@@ -954,17 +956,15 @@ int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val)
 				ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto out;
 		}
-		req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!req) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
 			goto out;
 		}
 		ret = __dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev, req, DEV_PM_QOS_LATENCY_TOLERANCE, val);
-		if (ret < 0) {
-			kfree(req);
+		if (ret < 0)
 			goto out;
-		}
 		dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req = req;
+		req = NULL;
 	} else {
 		if (val < 0) {
 			__dev_pm_qos_drop_user_request(dev, DEV_PM_QOS_LATENCY_TOLERANCE);
@@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val)
 
  out:
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
+	kfree(req);
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance);
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v4 5/9] PM / QoS: Teach lockdep about dev_pm_qos_mtx locking order

[Rob Clark]

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

Annotate dev_pm_qos_mtx to teach lockdep to scream about allocations
that could trigger reclaim under dev_pm_qos_mtx.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/base/power/qos.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/qos.c b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
index 5ec06585b6d1..63cb1086f195 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/qos.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
@@ -1017,3 +1017,14 @@ void dev_pm_qos_hide_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev)
 	pm_runtime_put(dev);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_qos_hide_latency_tolerance);
+
+static int __init dev_pm_qos_init(void)
+{
+	/* Teach lockdep about lock ordering wrt. shrinker: */
+	fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
+	might_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
+	fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+early_initcall(dev_pm_qos_init);
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v4 6/9] interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim

[Rob Clark]

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

For cases where icc_bw_set() can be called in callbaths that could
deadlock against shrinker/reclaim, such as runpm resume, we need to
decouple the icc locking.  Introduce a new icc_bw_lock for cases where
we need to serialize bw aggregation and update to decouple that from
paths that require memory allocation such as node/link creation/
destruction.

Fixes this lockdep splat:

   ======================================================
   WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
   6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #554 Not tainted
   ------------------------------------------------------
   ring0/132 is trying to acquire lock:
   ffffff80871916d0 (&gmu->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: a6xx_pm_resume+0xf0/0x234

   but task is already holding lock:
   ffffffdb5aee57e8 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: msm_job_run+0x68/0x150

   which lock already depends on the new lock.

   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

   -> #4 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}:
          __dma_fence_might_wait+0x74/0xc0
          dma_resv_lockdep+0x1f4/0x2f4
          do_one_initcall+0x104/0x2bc
          kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x34c
          kernel_init+0x30/0x134
          ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

   -> #3 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}:
          fs_reclaim_acquire+0x80/0xa8
          slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c
          __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc
          __kmalloc+0xd8/0x100
          topology_parse_cpu_capacity+0x8c/0x178
          get_cpu_for_node+0x88/0xc4
          parse_cluster+0x1b0/0x28c
          parse_cluster+0x8c/0x28c
          init_cpu_topology+0x168/0x188
          smp_prepare_cpus+0x24/0xf8
          kernel_init_freeable+0x18c/0x34c
          kernel_init+0x30/0x134
          ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

   -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
          __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x3c/0x48
          fs_reclaim_acquire+0x54/0xa8
          slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c
          __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc
          __kmalloc+0xd8/0x100
          kzalloc.constprop.0+0x14/0x20
          icc_node_create_nolock+0x4c/0xc4
          icc_node_create+0x38/0x58
          qcom_icc_rpmh_probe+0x1b8/0x248
          platform_probe+0x70/0xc4
          really_probe+0x158/0x290
          __driver_probe_device+0xc8/0xe0
          driver_probe_device+0x44/0x100
          __driver_attach+0xf8/0x108
          bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xc4
          driver_attach+0x2c/0x38
          bus_add_driver+0xd0/0x1d8
          driver_register+0xbc/0xf8
          __platform_driver_register+0x30/0x3c
          qnoc_driver_init+0x24/0x30
          do_one_initcall+0x104/0x2bc
          kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x34c
          kernel_init+0x30/0x134
          ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

   -> #1 (icc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
          __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8
          mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44
          icc_set_bw+0x88/0x2b4
          _set_opp_bw+0x8c/0xd8
          _set_opp+0x19c/0x300
          dev_pm_opp_set_opp+0x84/0x94
          a6xx_gmu_resume+0x18c/0x804
          a6xx_pm_resume+0xf8/0x234
          adreno_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x38
          pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x30/0x44
          __rpm_callback+0x15c/0x174
          rpm_callback+0x78/0x7c
          rpm_resume+0x318/0x524
          __pm_runtime_resume+0x78/0xbc
          adreno_load_gpu+0xc4/0x17c
          msm_open+0x50/0x120
          drm_file_alloc+0x17c/0x228
          drm_open_helper+0x74/0x118
          drm_open+0xa0/0x144
          drm_stub_open+0xd4/0xe4
          chrdev_open+0x1b8/0x1e4
          do_dentry_open+0x2f8/0x38c
          vfs_open+0x34/0x40
          path_openat+0x64c/0x7b4
          do_filp_open+0x54/0xc4
          do_sys_openat2+0x9c/0x100
          do_sys_open+0x50/0x7c
          __arm64_sys_openat+0x28/0x34
          invoke_syscall+0x8c/0x128
          el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xa0/0x11c
          do_el0_svc+0xac/0xbc
          el0_svc+0x48/0xa0
          el0t_64_sync_handler+0xac/0x13c
          el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194

   -> #0 (&gmu->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
          __lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060
          lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8
          __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8
          mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44
          a6xx_pm_resume+0xf0/0x234
          adreno_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x38
          pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x30/0x44
          __rpm_callback+0x15c/0x174
          rpm_callback+0x78/0x7c
          rpm_resume+0x318/0x524
          __pm_runtime_resume+0x78/0xbc
          pm_runtime_get_sync.isra.0+0x14/0x20
          msm_gpu_submit+0x58/0x178
          msm_job_run+0x78/0x150
          drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370
          kthread+0xf0/0x100
          ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

   other info that might help us debug this:

   Chain exists of:
     &gmu->lock --> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start --> dma_fence_map

    Possible unsafe locking scenario:

          CPU0                    CPU1
          ----                    ----
     lock(dma_fence_map);
                                  lock(mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start);
                                  lock(dma_fence_map);
     lock(&gmu->lock);

    *** DEADLOCK ***

   2 locks held by ring0/132:
    #0: ffffff8087191170 (&gpu->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_job_run+0x64/0x150
    #1: ffffffdb5aee57e8 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: msm_job_run+0x68/0x150

   stack backtrace:
   CPU: 7 PID: 132 Comm: ring0 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #554
   Hardware name: Google Lazor (rev1 - 2) with LTE (DT)
   Call trace:
    dump_backtrace.part.0+0xb4/0xf8
    show_stack+0x20/0x38
    dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xd0
    dump_stack+0x18/0x34
    print_circular_bug+0x1b4/0x1f0
    check_noncircular+0x78/0xac
    __lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060
    lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8
    __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8
    mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44
    a6xx_pm_resume+0xf0/0x234
    adreno_runtime_resume+0x2c/0x38
    pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x30/0x44
    __rpm_callback+0x15c/0x174
    rpm_callback+0x78/0x7c
    rpm_resume+0x318/0x524
    __pm_runtime_resume+0x78/0xbc
    pm_runtime_get_sync.isra.0+0x14/0x20
    msm_gpu_submit+0x58/0x178
    msm_job_run+0x78/0x150
    drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370
    kthread+0xf0/0x100
    ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/interconnect/core.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/core.c b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
index 5fac448c28fd..e15a92a79df1 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/core.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(icc_providers);
 static int providers_count;
 static bool synced_state;
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(icc_lock);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(icc_bw_lock);
 static struct dentry *icc_debugfs_dir;
 
 static void icc_summary_show_one(struct seq_file *s, struct icc_node *n)
@@ -631,7 +632,7 @@ int icc_set_bw(struct icc_path *path, u32 avg_bw, u32 peak_bw)
 	if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(path) || !path->num_nodes))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	mutex_lock(&icc_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&icc_bw_lock);
 
 	old_avg = path->reqs[0].avg_bw;
 	old_peak = path->reqs[0].peak_bw;
@@ -663,7 +664,7 @@ int icc_set_bw(struct icc_path *path, u32 avg_bw, u32 peak_bw)
 		apply_constraints(path);
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&icc_bw_lock);
 
 	trace_icc_set_bw_end(path, ret);
 
@@ -872,6 +873,7 @@ void icc_node_add(struct icc_node *node, struct icc_provider *provider)
 		return;
 
 	mutex_lock(&icc_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&icc_bw_lock);
 
 	node->provider = provider;
 	list_add_tail(&node->node_list, &provider->nodes);
@@ -900,6 +902,7 @@ void icc_node_add(struct icc_node *node, struct icc_provider *provider)
 	node->avg_bw = 0;
 	node->peak_bw = 0;
 
+	mutex_unlock(&icc_bw_lock);
 	mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_node_add);
@@ -1025,6 +1028,7 @@ void icc_sync_state(struct device *dev)
 		return;
 
 	mutex_lock(&icc_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&icc_bw_lock);
 	synced_state = true;
 	list_for_each_entry(p, &icc_providers, provider_list) {
 		dev_dbg(p->dev, "interconnect provider is in synced state\n");
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v4 7/9] interconnect: Teach lockdep about icc_bw_lock order

[Rob Clark]

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

Teach lockdep that icc_bw_lock is needed in code paths that could
deadlock if they trigger reclaim.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/interconnect/core.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/core.c b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
index e15a92a79df1..1afbc4f7c6e7 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/core.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
@@ -1041,13 +1041,21 @@ void icc_sync_state(struct device *dev)
 			}
 		}
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&icc_bw_lock);
 	mutex_unlock(&icc_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(icc_sync_state);
 
 static int __init icc_init(void)
 {
-	struct device_node *root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
+	struct device_node *root;
+
+	/* Teach lockdep about lock ordering wrt. shrinker: */
+	fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
+	might_lock(&icc_bw_lock);
+	fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
+
+	root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
 
 	providers_count = of_count_icc_providers(root);
 	of_node_put(root);
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v4 8/9] drm/sched: Add (optional) fence signaling annotation

[Rob Clark]

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

Based on
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20200604081224.863494-10-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch/
but made to be optional.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 9 +++++++++
 include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h            | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
index 7b2bfc10c1a5..b0368b815ff5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
@@ -1005,10 +1005,15 @@ static bool drm_sched_blocked(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
 static int drm_sched_main(void *param)
 {
 	struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched = (struct drm_gpu_scheduler *)param;
+	const bool fence_signalling = sched->fence_signalling;
+	bool fence_cookie;
 	int r;
 
 	sched_set_fifo_low(current);
 
+	if (fence_signalling)
+		fence_cookie = dma_fence_begin_signalling();
+
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
 		struct drm_sched_entity *entity = NULL;
 		struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence;
@@ -1064,6 +1069,10 @@ static int drm_sched_main(void *param)
 
 		wake_up(&sched->job_scheduled);
 	}
+
+	if (fence_signalling)
+		dma_fence_end_signalling(fence_cookie);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
index e95b4837e5a3..58d958ad31a1 100644
--- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
+++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
@@ -493,6 +493,7 @@ struct drm_sched_backend_ops {
  * @ready: marks if the underlying HW is ready to work
  * @free_guilty: A hit to time out handler to free the guilty job.
  * @dev: system &struct device
+ * @fence_signalling: Opt in to fence signalling annotations
  *
  * One scheduler is implemented for each hardware ring.
  */
@@ -517,6 +518,7 @@ struct drm_gpu_scheduler {
 	bool				ready;
 	bool				free_guilty;
 	struct device			*dev;
+	bool 				fence_signalling;
 };
 
 int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
-- 
2.41.0

[PATCH v4 9/9] drm/msm: Enable fence signalling annotations

[Rob Clark]

From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

Now that the runpm/qos/interconnect lockdep vs reclaim issues are
solved, we can enable the fence signalling annotations without lockdep
making it's immediate displeasure known.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c
index 7f5e0a961bba..cb9cf41bcb9b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_ringbuffer.c
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct msm_ringbuffer *msm_ringbuffer_new(struct msm_gpu *gpu, int id,
 	 /* currently managing hangcheck ourselves: */
 	sched_timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
 
+	ring->sched.fence_signalling = true;
 	ret = drm_sched_init(&ring->sched, &msm_sched_ops,
 			num_hw_submissions, 0, sched_timeout,
 			NULL, NULL, to_msm_bo(ring->bo)->name, gpu->dev->dev);
-- 
2.41.0