From: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org (open list:POWER MANAGEMENT CORE),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/9] PM / QoS: Decouple request alloc from dev_pm_qos_mtx
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 10:11:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230807171148.210181-5-robdclark@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230807171148.210181-1-robdclark@gmail.com>
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Similar to the previous patch, move the allocation out from under
dev_pm_qos_mtx, by speculatively doing the allocation and handle
any race after acquiring dev_pm_qos_mtx by freeing the redundant
allocation.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
drivers/base/power/qos.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/qos.c b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
index 7e95760d16dc..5ec06585b6d1 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/qos.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/qos.c
@@ -930,8 +930,12 @@ s32 dev_pm_qos_get_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev)
int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val)
{
struct dev_pm_qos *qos = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev);
+ struct dev_pm_qos_request *req = NULL;
int ret = 0;
+ if (!dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req)
+ req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL);
+
mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
dev_pm_qos_constraints_set(dev, qos);
@@ -945,8 +949,6 @@ int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val)
goto out;
if (!dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req) {
- struct dev_pm_qos_request *req;
-
if (val < 0) {
if (val == PM_QOS_LATENCY_TOLERANCE_NO_CONSTRAINT)
ret = 0;
@@ -954,17 +956,15 @@ int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val)
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
- req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!req) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
ret = __dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev, req, DEV_PM_QOS_LATENCY_TOLERANCE, val);
- if (ret < 0) {
- kfree(req);
+ if (ret < 0)
goto out;
- }
dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req = req;
+ req = NULL;
} else {
if (val < 0) {
__dev_pm_qos_drop_user_request(dev, DEV_PM_QOS_LATENCY_TOLERANCE);
@@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val)
out:
mutex_unlock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx);
+ kfree(req);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance);
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-07 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-07 17:11 [PATCH v4 0/9] drm/msm+PM+icc: Make job_run() reclaim-safe Rob Clark
2023-08-07 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] PM / devfreq: Drop unneed locking to appease lockdep Rob Clark
2023-08-07 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] PM / devfreq: Teach lockdep about locking order Rob Clark
2023-08-07 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] PM / QoS: Fix constraints alloc vs reclaim locking Rob Clark
2023-08-07 17:11 ` Rob Clark [this message]
2023-08-07 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] PM / QoS: Teach lockdep about dev_pm_qos_mtx locking order Rob Clark
2023-08-07 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim Rob Clark
2023-08-07 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] interconnect: Teach lockdep about icc_bw_lock order Rob Clark
2023-08-07 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] drm/sched: Add (optional) fence signaling annotation Rob Clark
2023-08-07 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] drm/msm: Enable fence signalling annotations Rob Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230807171148.210181-5-robdclark@gmail.com \
--to=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox