public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, gautham.shenoy@amd.com,
	kprateek.nayak@amd.com, aaron.lu@intel.com,
	wuyun.abel@bytedance.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/7] sched: Check cpu_active() earlier in newidle_balance()
Date: Wed,  9 Aug 2023 17:12:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230809221218.163894-4-void@manifault.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230809221218.163894-1-void@manifault.com>

In newidle_balance(), we check if the current CPU is inactive, and then
decline to pull any remote tasks to the core if so. Before this check,
however, we're currently updating rq->idle_stamp. If a core is offline,
setting its idle stamp is not useful. The core won't be chosen by any
task in select_task_rq_fair(), and setting the rq->idle_stamp is
misleading anyways given that the core being inactive should imply that
it should have a very cold cache.

Let's set rq->idle_stamp in newidle_balance() only if the cpu is active.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index c28206499a3d..eb15d6f46479 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -12037,18 +12037,18 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 	if (this_rq->ttwu_pending)
 		return 0;
 
-	/*
-	 * We must set idle_stamp _before_ calling idle_balance(), such that we
-	 * measure the duration of idle_balance() as idle time.
-	 */
-	this_rq->idle_stamp = rq_clock(this_rq);
-
 	/*
 	 * Do not pull tasks towards !active CPUs...
 	 */
 	if (!cpu_active(this_cpu))
 		return 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * We must set idle_stamp _before_ calling idle_balance(), such that we
+	 * measure the duration of idle_balance() as idle time.
+	 */
+	this_rq->idle_stamp = rq_clock(this_rq);
+
 	/*
 	 * This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being picked
 	 * for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still disabled avoiding
-- 
2.41.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-09 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-09 22:12 [PATCH v3 0/7] sched: Implement shared runqueue in CFS David Vernet
2023-08-09 22:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] sched: Expose move_queued_task() from core.c David Vernet
2023-08-09 22:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] sched: Move is_cpu_allowed() into sched.h David Vernet
2023-08-09 22:12 ` David Vernet [this message]
2023-08-09 22:12 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] sched: Enable sched_feat callbacks on enable/disable David Vernet
2023-08-09 22:12 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] sched/fair: Add SHARED_RUNQ sched feature and skeleton calls David Vernet
2023-08-09 22:12 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] sched: Implement shared runqueue in CFS David Vernet
2023-08-10  7:11   ` kernel test robot
2023-08-10  7:41   ` kernel test robot
2023-08-30  6:46   ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-08-31  1:34     ` David Vernet
2023-08-31  3:47       ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-08-09 22:12 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] sched: Shard per-LLC shared runqueues David Vernet
2023-08-09 23:46   ` kernel test robot
2023-08-10  0:12     ` David Vernet
2023-08-10  7:11   ` kernel test robot
2023-08-30  6:17   ` Chen Yu
2023-08-31  0:01     ` David Vernet
2023-08-31 10:45       ` Chen Yu
2023-08-31 19:14         ` David Vernet
2023-09-23  6:35           ` Chen Yu
2023-08-17  8:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] sched: Implement shared runqueue in CFS Gautham R. Shenoy
2023-08-18  5:03   ` David Vernet
2023-08-18  8:49     ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2023-08-24 11:14       ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2023-08-24 22:51         ` David Vernet
2023-08-30  9:56           ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-08-31  2:32             ` David Vernet
2023-08-31  4:21               ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-08-31 10:45             ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] DO NOT MERGE: Breaking down the experimantal diff K Prateek Nayak
2023-08-31 10:45               ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] sched/fair: Move SHARED_RUNQ related structs and definitions into sched.h K Prateek Nayak
2023-08-31 10:45               ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched/fair: Improve integration of SHARED_RUNQ feature within newidle_balance K Prateek Nayak
2023-08-31 18:45                 ` David Vernet
2023-08-31 19:47                   ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-08-31 10:45               ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched/fair: Add a per-shard overload flag K Prateek Nayak
2023-08-31 19:11                 ` David Vernet
2023-08-31 20:23                   ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-09-29 17:01                     ` David Vernet
2023-10-04  4:21                       ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-10-04 17:20                         ` David Vernet
2023-10-05  3:50                           ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-09-27  4:23                   ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-09-27  6:59                     ` Chen Yu
2023-09-27  8:36                       ` K Prateek Nayak
2023-09-28  8:41                         ` Chen Yu
2023-10-03 21:05                       ` David Vernet
2023-10-07  2:10                         ` Chen Yu
2023-09-27 13:08                     ` David Vernet
2023-11-27  8:28 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] sched: Implement shared runqueue in CFS Aboorva Devarajan
2023-11-27 19:49   ` David Vernet
2023-12-07  6:00     ` Aboorva Devarajan
2023-12-04 19:30 ` David Vernet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230809221218.163894-4-void@manifault.com \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox