From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1997CC001B0 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 07:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233752AbjHJHMz (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 03:12:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45190 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230434AbjHJHMx (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 03:12:53 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03C1E270E for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:12:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1691651550; x=1723187550; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=07NFToZiRu93+q+YP5AYVi+vMiMQ/VG7Ym/meIlzwnI=; b=hyDWdFt74iegHdWNw0yfI0qECjXGAIjk5lws/6mMRQ1IIjTe+rRK4b8E eHtU9lHyFmfZJMEurLUP8KFlnpuBBvp/Oaxzm11ZjnK33NGaltVdErDwz 8eX3yZt5JBe/kFUA3UN4pW8HVD1gh7cgXe7sruV3BUWrDlXOh4OBs3Phn UtWSnW/qbJGQlryUns3KiTA39Jk6wz84+rRPJzh7CAEPEXRGJCaki4lJP DPBHa2kXWsUnmOWmgEIW7ptSZs9nuyihf2EhMriBYj2G2tOoHPpXynW1Y sIo/CHe1JpxChePp4kMjeGzGcjBitn0xgQsOsiZ+r1BCgcE/wzy4pZmjb g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10797"; a="437672550" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,161,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="437672550" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Aug 2023 00:12:07 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10797"; a="822125691" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,161,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="822125691" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d1ccc7e87e8f) ([10.239.97.150]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Aug 2023 00:12:03 -0700 Received: from kbuild by d1ccc7e87e8f with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qTzpy-0006oy-0q; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 07:12:02 +0000 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:11:06 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: David Vernet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, gautham.shenoy@amd.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com, aaron.lu@intel.com, wuyun.abel@bytedance.com, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] sched: Implement shared runqueue in CFS Message-ID: <202308101517.FuIh97h7-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230809221218.163894-7-void@manifault.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230809221218.163894-7-void@manifault.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi David, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on tip/sched/core] [cannot apply to linus/master v6.5-rc5 next-20230809] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/David-Vernet/sched-Expose-move_queued_task-from-core-c/20230810-061611 base: tip/sched/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809221218.163894-7-void%40manifault.com patch subject: [PATCH v3 6/7] sched: Implement shared runqueue in CFS config: sparc-randconfig-r015-20230809 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230810/202308101517.FuIh97h7-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sparc-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230810/202308101517.FuIh97h7-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308101517.FuIh97h7-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/sched/core.c:9768:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'sched_update_domains' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 9768 | void sched_update_domains(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- In file included from kernel/sched/build_utility.c:89: kernel/sched/topology.c: In function 'sched_init_domains': >> kernel/sched/topology.c:2580:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'sched_update_domains'; did you mean 'sched_update_scaling'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 2580 | sched_update_domains(); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | sched_update_scaling cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +2580 kernel/sched/topology.c 2558 2559 /* 2560 * Set up scheduler domains and groups. For now this just excludes isolated 2561 * CPUs, but could be used to exclude other special cases in the future. 2562 */ 2563 int __init sched_init_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map) 2564 { 2565 int err; 2566 2567 zalloc_cpumask_var(&sched_domains_tmpmask, GFP_KERNEL); 2568 zalloc_cpumask_var(&sched_domains_tmpmask2, GFP_KERNEL); 2569 zalloc_cpumask_var(&fallback_doms, GFP_KERNEL); 2570 2571 arch_update_cpu_topology(); 2572 asym_cpu_capacity_scan(); 2573 ndoms_cur = 1; 2574 doms_cur = alloc_sched_domains(ndoms_cur); 2575 if (!doms_cur) 2576 doms_cur = &fallback_doms; 2577 cpumask_and(doms_cur[0], cpu_map, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN)); 2578 err = build_sched_domains(doms_cur[0], NULL); 2579 if (!err) > 2580 sched_update_domains(); 2581 2582 return err; 2583 } 2584 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki