public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	chenhuacai@kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] tick: Rename tick_do_update_jiffies64() and allow external usage
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:30:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202308101853.wOMMd0Tf-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230810062527.3700080-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn>

Hi Huacai,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on paulmck-rcu/dev]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master]
[cannot apply to tip/timers/nohz]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Huacai-Chen/rcu-Update-jiffies-in-rcu_cpu_stall_reset/20230810-142629
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git dev
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230810062527.3700080-1-chenhuacai%40loongson.cn
patch subject: [PATCH V2 1/2] tick: Rename tick_do_update_jiffies64() and allow external usage
config: powerpc-randconfig-r013-20230809 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230810/202308101853.wOMMd0Tf-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230810/202308101853.wOMMd0Tf-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308101853.wOMMd0Tf-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:677:
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:45:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
      45 | DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insw, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      46 |                  (p, b, c), pio, p)
         |                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:674:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
     674 |                 __do_##name al;                                 \
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   <scratch space>:49:1: note: expanded from here
      49 | __do_insw
         | ^
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:615:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insw'
     615 | #define __do_insw(p, b, n)      readsw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
         |                                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
   In file included from kernel/time/tick-sched.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:677:
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:47:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
      47 | DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insl, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      48 |                  (p, b, c), pio, p)
         |                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:674:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
     674 |                 __do_##name al;                                 \
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   <scratch space>:51:1: note: expanded from here
      51 | __do_insl
         | ^
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:616:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insl'
     616 | #define __do_insl(p, b, n)      readsl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
         |                                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
   In file included from kernel/time/tick-sched.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:677:
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:49:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
      49 | DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsb, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      50 |                  (p, b, c), pio, p)
         |                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:674:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
     674 |                 __do_##name al;                                 \
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   <scratch space>:53:1: note: expanded from here
      53 | __do_outsb
         | ^
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:617:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsb'
     617 | #define __do_outsb(p, b, n)     writesb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
         |                                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
   In file included from kernel/time/tick-sched.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:677:
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:51:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
      51 | DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsw, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      52 |                  (p, b, c), pio, p)
         |                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:674:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
     674 |                 __do_##name al;                                 \
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   <scratch space>:55:1: note: expanded from here
      55 | __do_outsw
         | ^
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:618:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsw'
     618 | #define __do_outsw(p, b, n)     writesw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
         |                                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
   In file included from kernel/time/tick-sched.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
   In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
   In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
   In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:677:
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:53:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
      53 | DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsl, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
         | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      54 |                  (p, b, c), pio, p)
         |                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:674:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
     674 |                 __do_##name al;                                 \
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   <scratch space>:57:1: note: expanded from here
      57 | __do_outsl
         | ^
   arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:619:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsl'
     619 | #define __do_outsl(p, b, n)     writesl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
         |                                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>> kernel/time/tick-sched.c:114:4: error: call to undeclared function 'tick_do_update_jiffies_64'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     114 |                         tick_do_update_jiffies_64(now);
         |                         ^
   kernel/time/tick-sched.c:114:4: note: did you mean 'do_update_jiffies_64'?
   include/linux/jiffies.h:91:6: note: 'do_update_jiffies_64' declared here
      91 | void do_update_jiffies_64(s64 now); /* typedef s64 ktime_t */
         |      ^
   6 warnings and 1 error generated.


vim +/tick_do_update_jiffies_64 +114 kernel/time/tick-sched.c

   100	
   101		/* Check, if the jiffies need an update */
   102		if (tick_do_timer_cpu == cpu)
   103			do_update_jiffies_64(now);
   104	
   105		/*
   106		 * If jiffies update stalled for too long (timekeeper in stop_machine()
   107		 * or VMEXIT'ed for several msecs), force an update.
   108		 */
   109		if (ts->last_tick_jiffies != jiffies) {
   110			ts->stalled_jiffies = 0;
   111			ts->last_tick_jiffies = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
   112		} else {
   113			if (++ts->stalled_jiffies == MAX_STALLED_JIFFIES) {
 > 114				tick_do_update_jiffies_64(now);
   115				ts->stalled_jiffies = 0;
   116				ts->last_tick_jiffies = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
   117			}
   118		}
   119	
   120		if (ts->inidle)
   121			ts->got_idle_tick = 1;
   122	}
   123	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-10 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-10  6:25 [PATCH V2 1/2] tick: Rename tick_do_update_jiffies64() and allow external usage Huacai Chen
2023-08-10  6:25 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] rcu: Update jiffies in rcu_cpu_stall_reset() Huacai Chen
2023-08-10 10:30 ` kernel test robot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202308101853.wOMMd0Tf-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=chenhuacai@loongson.cn \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox