public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] cpuidle: Comment about timers requirements VS idle handler
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 19:00:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230811170049.308866-6-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230811170049.308866-1-frederic@kernel.org>

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/idle.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
index 342f58a329f5..d52f6e3e3854 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
@@ -258,6 +258,36 @@ static void do_idle(void)
 	while (!need_resched()) {
 		rmb();
 
+		/*
+		 * Interrupts shouldn't be re-enabled from that point on until
+		 * the CPU sleeping instruction is reached. Otherwise an interrupt
+		 * may fire and queue a timer that would be ignored until the CPU
+		 * wakes from the sleeping instruction. And testing need_resched()
+		 * doesn't tell about pending needed timer reprogram.
+		 *
+		 * Several cases to consider:
+		 *
+		 * - SLEEP-UNTIL-PENDING-INTERRUPT based instructions such as
+		 *   "wfi" or "mwait" are fine because they can be entered with
+		 *   interrupt disabled.
+		 *
+		 * - sti;mwait() couple is fine because the interrupts are
+		 *   re-enabled only upon the execution of mwait, leaving no gap
+		 *   in-between.
+		 *
+		 * - ROLLBACK based idle handlers with the sleeping instruction
+		 *   called with interrupts enabled are NOT fine. In this scheme
+		 *   when the interrupt detects it has interrupted an idle handler,
+		 *   it rolls back to its beginning which performs the
+		 *   need_resched() check before re-executing the sleeping
+		 *   instruction. This can leak a pending needed timer reprogram.
+		 *   If such a scheme is really mandatory due to the lack of an
+		 *   appropriate CPU sleeping instruction, then a FAST-FORWARD
+		 *   must instead be applied: when the interrupt detects it has
+		 *   interrupted an idle handler, it must resume to the end of
+		 *   this idle handler so that the generic idle loop is iterated
+		 *   again to reprogram the tick.
+		 */
 		local_irq_disable();
 
 		if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) {
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-11 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-11 17:00 [PATCH 00/10] timers/cpuidle: Fixes and cleanups Frederic Weisbecker
2023-08-11 17:00 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86: Add a comment about the "magic" behind shadow sti before mwait Frederic Weisbecker
2023-08-11 17:44   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-11 17:00 ` [PATCH 02/10] cpuidle: Fix CPUIDLE_FLAG_IRQ_ENABLE leaking timer reprogram Frederic Weisbecker
2023-08-11 17:35   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-11 17:00 ` [PATCH 03/10] cpuidle: Report illegal tick stopped while polling Frederic Weisbecker
2023-08-11 17:37   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-29 13:04     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-08-11 17:00 ` [PATCH 04/10] loongson: Fix idle VS timer enqueue Frederic Weisbecker
2023-08-14  2:58   ` bibo mao
2023-08-11 17:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2023-08-11 17:38   ` [PATCH 05/10] cpuidle: Comment about timers requirements VS idle handler Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-11 17:00 ` [PATCH 06/10] cpuidle: Remove unnecessary current_clr_polling_and_test() from haltpoll Frederic Weisbecker
2023-08-11 17:39   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-11 17:00 ` [PATCH 07/10] cpuidle: Remove unnecessary current_clr_polling() on poll_idle() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-08-11 17:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-11 17:00 ` [PATCH 08/10] x86: Remove __current_clr_polling() from mwait_idle() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-08-11 17:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-11 17:00 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86: Remove the current_clr_polling() call upon mwait exit Frederic Weisbecker
2023-08-11 17:41   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-11 17:00 ` [PATCH 10/10] sched/timers: Explain why idle task schedules out on remote timer enqueue Frederic Weisbecker
2023-08-11 17:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-08-15 16:10 ` [PATCH 00/10] timers/cpuidle: Fixes and cleanups Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-29 11:28   ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230811170049.308866-6-frederic@kernel.org \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox