Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/89] 5.15.127-rc1 review

Daniel Díaz
2023-08-15T05:05:20Z

Hello!

On 13/08/23 15:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.127 release.
> There are 89 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 15 Aug 2023 21:16:53 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.127-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

This branch exhibits the same problem with regards to x86 and Clang as reported on 6.4 [1] and 6.1 [2].

We found a one-off warning on i386 (physical machine):

-----8<-----
[ 1346.674005] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (igb): transmit queue 0 timed out
[ 1346.680282] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:477 dev_watchdog+0x21c/0x230
[ 1346.688549] Modules linked in: tun x86_pkg_temp_thermal
[ 1346.693773] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.15.127-rc1 #1
[ 1346.700211] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS 2.2 05/23/2018
[ 1346.707595] EIP: dev_watchdog+0x21c/0x230
[ 1346.711609] Code: 0a 1b 2e 00 eb b2 c6 43 ac 00 eb 89 8b 7d e8 c6 05 ac c0 76 c9 01 89 f8 e8 d1 19 fb ff 56 50 57 68 64 4a 4d c9 e8 06 f1 26 00 <0f> 0b 83 c4 10 eb 90 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 8d b6 00 00 00 00 3e 8d
[ 1346.730352] EAX: 00000037 EBX: c1b482a8 ECX: f5bb2690 EDX: f5bacbac
[ 1346.736611] ESI: 00000000 EDI: c1b48000 EBP: c118ff4c ESP: c118ff20
[ 1346.742869] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00210296
[ 1346.749653] CR0: 80050033 CR2: b7f4122c CR3: 030fe000 CR4: 003506d0
[ 1346.755910] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
[ 1346.762167] DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 00000400
[ 1346.766000] Call Trace:
[ 1346.768442] <SOFTIRQ>
[ 1346.770801] ? show_regs.cold+0x14/0x1a
[ 1346.774640] ? __warn+0x71/0x100
[ 1346.777873] ? dev_watchdog+0x21c/0x230
[ 1346.781713] ? report_bug+0x7e/0xa0
[ 1346.785203] ? exc_overflow+0x40/0x40
[ 1346.788871] ? handle_bug+0x2a/0x50
[ 1346.792363] ? exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x60
[ 1346.796200] ? handle_exception+0x133/0x133
[ 1346.800379] ? sugov_start+0x4b/0x160
[ 1346.804046] ? mptcp_token_join_cookie_init_state+0xa8/0xe0
[ 1346.809616] ? exc_overflow+0x40/0x40
[ 1346.813274] ? dev_watchdog+0x21c/0x230
[ 1346.817104] ? mptcp_token_join_cookie_init_state+0xa8/0xe0
[ 1346.822668] ? exc_overflow+0x40/0x40
[ 1346.826335] ? dev_watchdog+0x21c/0x230
[ 1346.830176] ? pfifo_fast_reset+0x150/0x150
[ 1346.834361] call_timer_fn+0x28/0xe0
[ 1346.837939] __run_timers+0x1e8/0x260
[ 1346.841596] ? pfifo_fast_reset+0x150/0x150
[ 1346.845773] run_timer_softirq+0x19/0x30
[ 1346.849692] __do_softirq+0xfc/0x2e9
[ 1346.853272] ? __softirqentry_text_start+0x8/0x8
[ 1346.857888] call_on_stack+0x45/0x50
[ 1346.861459] </SOFTIRQ>
[ 1346.863905] ? __irq_exit_rcu+0x90/0xc0
[ 1346.867745] ? irq_exit_rcu+0xd/0x20
[ 1346.871324] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x27/0x40
[ 1346.876288] ? handle_exception+0x133/0x133
[ 1346.880467] ? cpuidle_enter+0x27/0x40
[ 1346.884217] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0xc5/0x3c0
[ 1346.888577] ? trace_array_put+0x8/0x50
[ 1346.892417] ? sysvec_call_function_single+0x40/0x40
[ 1346.897382] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0xc8/0x3c0
[ 1346.901742] ? show_energy_performance_preference+0xd8/0xf0
[ 1346.907315] ? trace_array_put+0x8/0x50
[ 1346.911153] ? sysvec_call_function_single+0x40/0x40
[ 1346.916111] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0xc8/0x3c0
[ 1346.920471] ? cpuidle_enter+0x27/0x40
[ 1346.924221] ? do_idle+0x1e9/0x290
[ 1346.927621] ? cpu_startup_entry+0x25/0x30
[ 1346.931720] ? start_secondary+0x105/0x140
[ 1346.935818] ? startup_32_smp+0x161/0x164
[ 1346.939822] ---[ end trace 8a197f71c975528f ]---
----->8-----

This is possibly related to bug 216884 [3]. Full test log is available [4]. This did not happen again on handful of reruns of the same test.

Here's the rest of report:

## Build
* kernel: 5.15.127-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: 952b0de2b49f760b2e3b49d93faae7a6beb96dee
* git describe: v5.15.126-90-g952b0de2b49f
* test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.126-90-g952b0de2b49f

## Test regressions (compared to v5.15.126)
* i386, log-parser-test
- check-kernel-exception
- check-kernel-warning

* x86, log-parser-boot
- check-kernel-warning

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

## No metric regressions (compared to v5.15.126)

## No test fixes (compared to v5.15.126)

## No metric fixes (compared to v5.15.126)

## Test result summary
total: 123935, pass: 100041, fail: 3496, skip: 20284, xfail: 114

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 117 total, 116 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 35 total, 34 passed, 1 failed
* mips: 27 total, 26 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 27 total, 26 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 11 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance

Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@linaro.org

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/b2145971-5417-e1b1-40b4-f971e247e1ea@linaro.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/239281dd-3cb8-23de-9ea1-27e9c224cfbd@linaro.org/
[3] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216884
[4] https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6664165#L2145

--
Linaro LKFT