From: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>,
Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
kernel-team@android.com, "Connor O'Brien" <connoro@google.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 05/19] locking/mutex: Rework task_struct::blocked_on
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 06:08:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230819060915.3001568-6-jstultz@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230819060915.3001568-1-jstultz@google.com>
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Track the blocked-on relation for mutexes, this allows following this
relation at schedule time.
task
| blocked-on
v
mutex
| owner
v
task
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>
Cc: Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
[minor changes while rebasing]
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
[jstultz: Fix blocked_on tracking in __mutex_lock_common in error paths]
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
---
v2:
* Fixed blocked_on tracking in error paths that was causing crashes
v4:
* Ensure we clear blocked_on when waking ww_mutexes to die or wound.
This is critical so we don't get ciruclar blocked_on relationships
that can't be resolved.
v5:
* Fix potential bug where the skip_wait path might clear blocked_on
when that path never set it
* Slight tweaks to where we set blocked_on to make it consistent,
along with extra WARN_ON correctness checking
* Minor comment changes
---
include/linux/sched.h | 5 +----
kernel/fork.c | 3 +--
kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c | 9 +++++----
kernel/locking/mutex.c | 10 ++++++++++
kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h | 17 +++++++++++++++--
5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 4bc8a4912539..8b98e3933bd9 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1140,10 +1140,7 @@ struct task_struct {
struct rt_mutex_waiter *pi_blocked_on;
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
- /* Mutex deadlock detection: */
- struct mutex_waiter *blocked_on;
-#endif
+ struct mutex *blocked_on; /* lock we're blocked on */
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
int non_block_count;
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index d2e12b6d2b18..42b022fc3c4c 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -2458,9 +2458,8 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
lockdep_init_task(p);
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
p->blocked_on = NULL; /* not blocked yet */
-#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_BCACHE
p->sequential_io = 0;
p->sequential_io_avg = 0;
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
index bc8abb8549d2..7228909c3e62 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
@@ -52,17 +52,18 @@ void debug_mutex_add_waiter(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter,
{
lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
- /* Mark the current thread as blocked on the lock: */
- task->blocked_on = waiter;
+ /* Current thread can't be already blocked (since it's executing!) */
+ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(task->blocked_on);
}
void debug_mutex_remove_waiter(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter,
struct task_struct *task)
{
+ struct mutex *blocked_on = READ_ONCE(task->blocked_on);
+
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(list_empty(&waiter->list));
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(waiter->task != task);
- DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(task->blocked_on != waiter);
- task->blocked_on = NULL;
+ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(blocked_on && blocked_on != lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&waiter->list);
waiter->task = NULL;
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index 67ff08beebd6..8af9269ce8d9 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -622,6 +622,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
goto err_early_kill;
}
+ current->blocked_on = lock;
set_current_state(state);
trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_MUTEX);
for (;;) {
@@ -661,6 +662,10 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
first = __mutex_waiter_is_first(lock, &waiter);
+ /*
+ * Gets reset by unlock path().
+ */
+ current->blocked_on = lock;
set_current_state(state);
/*
* Here we order against unlock; we must either see it change
@@ -681,6 +686,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
}
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
acquired:
+ current->blocked_on = NULL;
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
if (ww_ctx) {
@@ -711,9 +717,11 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
return 0;
err:
+ current->blocked_on = NULL;
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
__mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
err_early_kill:
+ WARN_ON(current->blocked_on);
trace_contention_end(lock, ret);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
@@ -924,6 +932,8 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
next = waiter->task;
debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, waiter);
+ WARN_ON(next->blocked_on != lock);
+ next->blocked_on = NULL;
wake_q_add(&wake_q, next);
}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
index 8b94f4b89e74..8bb334491732 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
@@ -284,6 +284,13 @@ __ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter,
#ifndef WW_RT
debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, waiter);
#endif
+ /*
+ * When waking up the task to die, be sure to clear the
+ * blocked_on pointer. Otherwise we can see circular
+ * blocked_on relationships that can't resolve.
+ */
+ WARN_ON(waiter->task->blocked_on != lock);
+ waiter->task->blocked_on = NULL;
wake_q_add(wake_q, waiter->task);
}
@@ -331,9 +338,15 @@ static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock,
* it's wounded in __ww_mutex_check_kill() or has a
* wakeup pending to re-read the wounded state.
*/
- if (owner != current)
+ if (owner != current) {
+ /*
+ * When waking up the task to wound, be sure to clear the
+ * blocked_on pointer. Otherwise we can see circular
+ * blocked_on relationships that can't resolve.
+ */
+ owner->blocked_on = NULL;
wake_q_add(wake_q, owner);
-
+ }
return true;
}
--
2.42.0.rc1.204.g551eb34607-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-19 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-19 6:08 [PATCH v5 00/19] Proxy Execution: A generalized form of Priority Inheritance v5 John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 01/19] sched: Unify runtime accounting across classes John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 02/19] locking/mutex: Removes wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock John Stultz
2023-08-22 19:11 ` Waiman Long
2023-08-22 19:24 ` John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 03/19] locking/mutex: make mutex::wait_lock irq safe John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 04/19] locking/mutex: Expose __mutex_owner() John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` John Stultz [this message]
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 06/19] locking/mutex: Add task_struct::blocked_lock to serialize changes to the blocked_on state John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 07/19] locking/mutex: Add p->blocked_on wrappers for correctness checks John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 08/19] locking/mutex: Split blocked_on logic into two states (blocked_on and blocked_on_waking) John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 09/19] locking/mutex: Switch to mutex handoffs for CONFIG_PROXY_EXEC John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 10/19] sched: Split scheduler execution context John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 11/19] sched: Fix runtime accounting w/ split exec & sched contexts John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 12/19] sched: Unnest ttwu_runnable in prep for proxy-execution John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 13/19] sched: Split out __sched() deactivate task logic into a helper John Stultz
2023-08-23 21:12 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-23 21:25 ` John Stultz
2023-08-24 0:00 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-24 0:34 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 14/19] sched: Add a very simple proxy() function John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 15/19] sched: Add proxy deactivate helper John Stultz
2023-08-24 11:34 ` kernel test robot
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 16/19] sched: Fix proxy/current (push,pull)ability John Stultz
2023-08-22 15:20 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-08-22 16:19 ` John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 17/19] sched: Start blocked_on chain processing in proxy() John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 18/19] sched: Handle blocked-waiter migration (and return migration) John Stultz
2023-08-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v5 19/19] sched: Add blocked_donor link to task for smarter mutex handoffs John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230819060915.3001568-6-jstultz@google.com \
--to=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=connoro@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=youssefesmat@google.com \
--cc=zezeozue@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox