From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Abhijit Gangurde <abhijit.gangurde@amd.com>
Cc: masahiroy@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nipun.Gupta@amd.com, nikhil.agarwal@amd.com,
puneet.gupta@amd.com, git@amd.com, michal.simek@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] cdx: Remove cdx controller list from cdx bus system
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 16:06:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023082207-humped-unclasp-6058@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814102223.418046-2-abhijit.gangurde@amd.com>
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 03:52:19PM +0530, Abhijit Gangurde wrote:
> Remove xarray list of cdx controller. Instead, use platform bus
> to locate the cdx controller using compat string used by cdx
> controller platform driver.
You also now use an ida instead, right? Do you need to mention that
here?
> Signed-off-by: Abhijit Gangurde <abhijit.gangurde@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/cdx/cdx.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> include/linux/cdx/cdx_bus.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cdx/cdx.c b/drivers/cdx/cdx.c
> index d2cad4c670a0..1c0f76cf4f15 100644
> --- a/drivers/cdx/cdx.c
> +++ b/drivers/cdx/cdx.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> -#include <linux/xarray.h>
> +#include <linux/idr.h>
> #include <linux/cdx/cdx_bus.h>
> #include <linux/iommu.h>
> #include <linux/dma-map-ops.h>
> @@ -70,8 +70,10 @@
> #define CDX_DEFAULT_DMA_MASK (~0ULL)
> #define MAX_CDX_CONTROLLERS 16
>
> -/* CDX controllers registered with the CDX bus */
> -static DEFINE_XARRAY_ALLOC(cdx_controllers);
> +/* IDA for CDX controllers registered with the CDX bus */
> +DEFINE_IDA(cdx_controller_ida);
Why is this now a global variable?
thanks,
> +
> +static char *compat_node_name = "xlnx,versal-net-cdx";
>
> /**
> * cdx_dev_reset - Reset a CDX device
> @@ -384,7 +386,8 @@ static ssize_t rescan_store(const struct bus_type *bus,
> const char *buf, size_t count)
> {
> struct cdx_controller *cdx;
> - unsigned long index;
> + struct platform_device *pd;
> + struct device_node *np;
> bool val;
>
> if (kstrtobool(buf, &val) < 0)
> @@ -397,12 +400,19 @@ static ssize_t rescan_store(const struct bus_type *bus,
> cdx_unregister_devices(&cdx_bus_type);
>
> /* Rescan all the devices */
> - xa_for_each(&cdx_controllers, index, cdx) {
> - int ret;
> + for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, compat_node_name) {
> + if (!np)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> - ret = cdx->ops->scan(cdx);
> - if (ret)
> - dev_err(cdx->dev, "cdx bus scanning failed\n");
> + pd = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> + if (!pd)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + cdx = platform_get_drvdata(pd);
> + if (cdx && cdx->controller_registered && cdx->ops->scan)
> + cdx->ops->scan(cdx);
> +
> + put_device(&pd->dev);
What handles the locking here? What if a new device is added , or
removed, while you iterate this?
And what about racing with the controller_registered flag? Are you sure
that's needed?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-22 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-14 10:22 [PATCH v3 0/5] cdx: provide sysfs interface for cdx device resources Abhijit Gangurde
2023-08-14 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] cdx: Remove cdx controller list from cdx bus system Abhijit Gangurde
2023-08-22 14:06 ` Greg KH [this message]
2023-08-24 12:10 ` Gangurde, Abhijit
2023-08-14 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] cdx: Introduce lock to protect controller ops Abhijit Gangurde
2023-08-22 14:06 ` Greg KH
2023-08-14 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] cdx: add support for bus enable and disable Abhijit Gangurde
2023-08-22 14:08 ` Greg KH
2023-08-24 12:11 ` Gangurde, Abhijit
2023-08-14 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] cdx: add sysfs for bus reset Abhijit Gangurde
2023-08-14 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] cdx: add sysfs for subsystem, class and revision Abhijit Gangurde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023082207-humped-unclasp-6058@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Nipun.Gupta@amd.com \
--cc=abhijit.gangurde@amd.com \
--cc=git@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=nikhil.agarwal@amd.com \
--cc=puneet.gupta@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox