From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85707EE4993
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 14:25:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S230049AbjHWOZ6 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 23 Aug 2023 10:25:58 -0400
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33138 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S235683AbjHWOZ5 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 23 Aug 2023 10:25:57 -0400
Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1033AE68
        for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 07:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140])
        (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
         key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F24D615BF
        for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 14:25:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0599EC433C9;
        Wed, 23 Aug 2023 14:25:52 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
        s=k20201202; t=1692800753;
        bh=YxgrXikt9Lvvqkt6X1fJSal7MTHblE3Cq8OOJIBxl6M=;
        h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
        b=hHphIuUnFB5bZjd3v1ZkPUtFfDrS0R4UvfnnOHZEkvNrRZHMqCNzwQMrXnDoQ9myM
         DmOPMilKIV38h3aJ54GOiXu0Nl4/yHb4ZgFkxMUuLPUGUmdBhB3fe+U94tMFrPJPd1
         /NIG9V9tf3p6GDF9iY0gzQdGuQdyhP4ScpANHmbmtDhPvHP/fvHhkJkY+Vl4CMUBc5
         IOVOp/2xlkOBVasDvIAsxcxiWr6uxEU83MqJjTHZZ9laMXSh7rGeHhe4JsDSMeHA1T
         0MaL7GFlv1arHSlGAYj3JEiKVKuvn2UzRPJj8eejhqVn0WNcEevQXp3+gMcYQsDe5a
         D/+q6z/qQTYhA==
Date:   Wed, 23 Aug 2023 07:25:52 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Cc:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
        Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
        <pabeni@redhat.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
        Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>,
        Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/6] page_pool: frag API support for 32-bit
 arch with 64-bit DMA
Message-ID: <20230823072552.044d13b3@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <79a49ccd-b0c0-0b99-4b4d-c4a416d7e327@huawei.com>
References: <20230816100113.41034-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
        <20230816100113.41034-2-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
        <CAC_iWjJd8Td_uAonvq_89WquX9wpAx0EYYxYMbm3TTxb2+trYg@mail.gmail.com>
        <20230817091554.31bb3600@kernel.org>
        <CAC_iWjJQepZWVrY8BHgGgRVS1V_fTtGe-i=r8X5z465td3TvbA@mail.gmail.com>
        <20230817165744.73d61fb6@kernel.org>
        <CAC_iWjL4YfCOffAZPUun5wggxrqAanjd+8SgmJQN0yyWsvb3sg@mail.gmail.com>
        <20230818145145.4b357c89@kernel.org>
        <1b8e2681-ccd6-81e0-b696-8b6c26e31f26@huawei.com>
        <20230821113543.536b7375@kernel.org>
        <5bd4ba5d-c364-f3f6-bbeb-903d71102ea2@huawei.com>
        <20230822083821.58d5d26c@kernel.org>
        <79a49ccd-b0c0-0b99-4b4d-c4a416d7e327@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 11:03:31 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> On 2023/8/22 23:38, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 17:21:35 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:  
> >> As the CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT seems to used widely in x86/arm/mips/powerpc,
> >> I am not sure if we can really make the above assumption.
> >>
> >> https://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v6.4-rc6/K/ident/CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT  
> > 
> > Huh, it's actually used a lot less than I anticipated!
> > 
> > None of the x86/arm/mips/powerpc systems matter IMHO - the only _real_  
> 
> Is there any particular reason that you think that the above systems does
> not really matter?

Not the systems themselves but the combination of a 32b arch with 
an address space >16TB. All those arches have 64b equivalent, seems
logical to use the 64b version for a system with a large address space.
If we're talking about a system which ends up running Linux.

> As we have made a similar wrong assumption about those arches before, I am
> really trying to be more cautious about it.
> 
> I searched through the web, some seems to be claiming that "32-bits is DEAD",
> I am not sure if there is some common agreement among the kernel community,
> is there any previous discussion about that?

My suspicion/claim is that 32 + PAGE_SHIFT should be enough bits for
any 32b platform.