From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B14C27C40 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 01:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239020AbjHXBUk (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:20:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39280 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239070AbjHXBUg (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2023 21:20:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7F5610F4 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 18:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5657a28f920so3820045a12.3 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 18:20:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1692840032; x=1693444832; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=s+YJjfTJ2CkuC+9NB6jQl7KJU8EcbLSznIZ1SQdS0Ww=; b=RZICqqKsIMzwKfA2Ueox9ribDm0pr/+dwRryfn2hU2S8m0nmU3aNn4IO0ZhX0BXLDJ yr8F+ynlshV+pedCIvdzukN4AwNiUuomEvmtbqILCrEKgOqVrVz7CmUbuizI4z0aY/Gu PVdS/6daQkW5nw603RNSDx+U0plzgmEtdmrDI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692840032; x=1693444832; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=s+YJjfTJ2CkuC+9NB6jQl7KJU8EcbLSznIZ1SQdS0Ww=; b=fHRozYFlSgQlIJjSnLhn3wyfKAlScqgILS3QrK41pL39XMLgSzyFRbkzsvPTr7GfPV JmmN2kzdSInTP8xZWwu4lb6LvvLUW+co3azvJOwnaBflFrvf3WPyOk5jGOjKx4tGefwb xHCvshw9rJMKBzyP1DpqDt4OY28nl/MVA3AOrUAhkLTfQKm/MPSyOLMktRMuEyePZVNV Q6Wb7/QHomGJTZWoGllppMJvpd2g40q3npybAEjVqyu3b21tXr8dEMjhvXm6xrG2K788 WfiRolljvaoCG6yyRsRXlae865zRuDxILAOau4vNu80y/jrv7PAm0HpcuE1yDOvxcrYJ OOJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzk9R+Icz5NqxbGkxEQYlzg0tVkENyAv2S/Z/ICsHGiswh3F3Uw MHHFVfg7AJYtxlW9kshjxsg/Gg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHAcjLDuiJWXzPmDLQ/QUBMiQMCiXx6OhH0ZfSbdOPcNx64pyF/2QMK8CXZTvIfo5LYo/kDYQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:1046:b0:137:a9d7:de12 with SMTP id gt6-20020a056a20104600b00137a9d7de12mr11688917pzc.59.1692840032202; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 18:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (KD124209188001.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp. [124.209.188.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g12-20020a1709026b4c00b001bdb167f6ebsm11504470plt.94.2023.08.23.18.20.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 23 Aug 2023 18:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 10:20:27 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Ying Sun , Jesse T , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Nicolas Schier , Jonathan Corbet , Tomasz Figa , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] kconfig: introduce listunknownconfig Message-ID: <20230824012027.GD3913@google.com> References: <20230817012007.131868-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org> <20230820024519.GK907732@google.com> <20230820072119.GM907732@google.com> <20230820073332.GN907732@google.com> <20230822061203.GA610023@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (23/08/24 10:00), Masahiro Yamada wrote: > For the MFD_RK808 case particularly, > I believe Kconfig showed MFD_RK8XX_I2C > as a new option. I think there were some other unmet dependencies for MFD_RK8XX_I2C and I don't think the new config was shown. But even if it was, we still would have no idea that this meant "MFD_RK808 is not available anymore and the corresponding code won't get compiled". So the "this is not recognized anymore" is still needed and is quite helpful. Would you be OK with "list missing" being a warning (not a terminal condition)?