public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 05/14] tracing/filters: Optimise cpumask vs cpumask filtering when user mask is a single CPU
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 22:18:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230824021851.347395220@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20230824021812.938245293@goodmis.org

From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>

Steven noted that when the user-provided cpumask contains a single CPU,
then the filtering function can use a scalar as input instead of a
full-fledged cpumask.

Reuse do_filter_scalar_cpumask() when the input mask has a weight of one.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230707172155.70873-6-vschneid@redhat.com

Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
index 3009d0c61b53..2fe65ddeb34e 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ enum filter_pred_fn {
 	FILTER_PRED_FN_CPU,
 	FILTER_PRED_FN_CPU_CPUMASK,
 	FILTER_PRED_FN_CPUMASK,
+	FILTER_PRED_FN_CPUMASK_CPU,
 	FILTER_PRED_FN_FUNCTION,
 	FILTER_PRED_FN_,
 	FILTER_PRED_TEST_VISITED,
@@ -957,6 +958,22 @@ static int filter_pred_cpumask(struct filter_pred *pred, void *event)
 	return do_filter_cpumask(pred->op, mask, cmp);
 }
 
+/* Filter predicate for cpumask field vs user-provided scalar  */
+static int filter_pred_cpumask_cpu(struct filter_pred *pred, void *event)
+{
+	u32 item = *(u32 *)(event + pred->offset);
+	int loc = item & 0xffff;
+	const struct cpumask *mask = (event + loc);
+	unsigned int cpu = pred->val;
+
+	/*
+	 * This inverts the usual usage of the function (field is first element,
+	 * user parameter is second), but that's fine because the (scalar, mask)
+	 * operations used are symmetric.
+	 */
+	return do_filter_scalar_cpumask(pred->op, cpu, mask);
+}
+
 /* Filter predicate for COMM. */
 static int filter_pred_comm(struct filter_pred *pred, void *event)
 {
@@ -1453,6 +1470,8 @@ static int filter_pred_fn_call(struct filter_pred *pred, void *event)
 		return filter_pred_cpu_cpumask(pred, event);
 	case FILTER_PRED_FN_CPUMASK:
 		return filter_pred_cpumask(pred, event);
+	case FILTER_PRED_FN_CPUMASK_CPU:
+		return filter_pred_cpumask_cpu(pred, event);
 	case FILTER_PRED_FN_FUNCTION:
 		return filter_pred_function(pred, event);
 	case FILTER_PRED_TEST_VISITED:
@@ -1666,6 +1685,7 @@ static int parse_pred(const char *str, void *data,
 
 	} else if (!strncmp(str + i, "CPUS", 4)) {
 		unsigned int maskstart;
+		bool single;
 		char *tmp;
 
 		switch (field->filter_type) {
@@ -1724,8 +1744,21 @@ static int parse_pred(const char *str, void *data,
 
 		/* Move along */
 		i++;
+
+		/*
+		 * Optimisation: if the user-provided mask has a weight of one
+		 * then we can treat it as a scalar input.
+		 */
+		single = cpumask_weight(pred->mask) == 1;
+		if (single && field->filter_type == FILTER_CPUMASK) {
+			pred->val = cpumask_first(pred->mask);
+			kfree(pred->mask);
+		}
+
 		if (field->filter_type == FILTER_CPUMASK) {
-			pred->fn_num = FILTER_PRED_FN_CPUMASK;
+			pred->fn_num = single ?
+				FILTER_PRED_FN_CPUMASK_CPU :
+				FILTER_PRED_FN_CPUMASK;
 		} else if (field->filter_type == FILTER_CPU) {
 			pred->fn_num = FILTER_PRED_FN_CPU_CPUMASK;
 		} else {
-- 
2.40.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-24  2:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-24  2:18 [for-next][PATCH 00/14] tracing: More updates for 6.6 Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24  2:18 ` [for-next][PATCH 01/14] tracing/filters: Dynamically allocate filter_pred.regex Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24  2:18 ` [for-next][PATCH 02/14] tracing/filters: Enable filtering a cpumask field by another cpumask Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24  2:18 ` [for-next][PATCH 03/14] tracing/filters: Enable filtering a scalar field by a cpumask Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24  2:18 ` [for-next][PATCH 04/14] tracing/filters: Enable filtering the CPU common " Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24  2:18 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2023-08-24  2:18 ` [for-next][PATCH 06/14] tracing/filters: Optimise scalar vs cpumask filtering when the user mask is a single CPU Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24  2:18 ` [for-next][PATCH 07/14] tracing/filters: Optimise CPU " Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24  2:18 ` [for-next][PATCH 08/14] tracing/filters: Further optimise scalar vs cpumask comparison Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24  2:18 ` [for-next][PATCH 09/14] tracing/filters: Document cpumask filtering Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24  2:18 ` [for-next][PATCH 10/14] tracing: Remove unused function declarations Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24  2:18 ` [for-next][PATCH 11/14] ftrace: Remove empty declaration ftrace_enable_daemon() and ftrace_disable_daemon() Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24  2:18 ` [for-next][PATCH 12/14] tracing/user_events: Optimize safe list traversals Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24  2:18 ` [for-next][PATCH 13/14] tracefs: Avoid changing i_mode to a temp value Steven Rostedt
2023-08-24  2:18 ` [for-next][PATCH 14/14] tracefs: Remove kerneldoc from struct eventfs_file Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230824021851.347395220@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=leobras@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox