[PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.49-rc1 review

[PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.49-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.49 release.
There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon, 28 Aug 2023 15:46:14 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.49-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 6.1.49-rc1

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "f2fs: fix to do sanity check on direct node in truncate_dnode()"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "f2fs: fix to set flush_merge opt and show noflush_merge"

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Revert "f2fs: don't reset unchangable mount option in f2fs_remount()"

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
    objtool/x86: Fix SRSO mess


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                             |  4 ++--
 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h                       |  1 +
 fs/f2fs/file.c                       |  5 +++++
 fs/f2fs/node.c                       | 14 ++----------
 fs/f2fs/super.c                      | 43 ++++++++++++------------------------
 include/linux/f2fs_fs.h              |  1 -
 tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c      | 11 +++++----
 tools/objtool/check.c                | 22 +++++++++++++++++-
 tools/objtool/include/objtool/arch.h |  1 +
 tools/objtool/include/objtool/elf.h  |  1 +
 10 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.49-rc1 review

[Joel Fernandes]

On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 05:47:56PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.49 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Mon, 28 Aug 2023 15:46:14 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.49-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>

thanks,

 - Joel


> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> -------------
> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
> 
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>     Linux 6.1.49-rc1
> 
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>     Revert "f2fs: fix to do sanity check on direct node in truncate_dnode()"
> 
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>     Revert "f2fs: fix to set flush_merge opt and show noflush_merge"
> 
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>     Revert "f2fs: don't reset unchangable mount option in f2fs_remount()"
> 
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>     objtool/x86: Fix SRSO mess
> 
> 
> -------------
> 
> Diffstat:
> 
>  Makefile                             |  4 ++--
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h                       |  1 +
>  fs/f2fs/file.c                       |  5 +++++
>  fs/f2fs/node.c                       | 14 ++----------
>  fs/f2fs/super.c                      | 43 ++++++++++++------------------------
>  include/linux/f2fs_fs.h              |  1 -
>  tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c      | 11 +++++----
>  tools/objtool/check.c                | 22 +++++++++++++++++-
>  tools/objtool/include/objtool/arch.h |  1 +
>  tools/objtool/include/objtool/elf.h  |  1 +
>  10 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> 
> 

Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.49-rc1 review

[Takeshi Ogasawara]

Hi Greg

On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 12:49 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.49 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 28 Aug 2023 15:46:14 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.49-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

6.1.49-rc1 tested.

Build successfully completed.
Boot successfully completed.
No dmesg regressions.
Video output normal.
Sound output normal.

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen10(Intel i7-1260P(x86_64) arch linux)

Thanks

Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com>

Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.49-rc1 review

[Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)]

Hi Greg,

On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 05:47:56PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.49 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Mon, 28 Aug 2023 15:46:14 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 13.2.1 20230826):
mips: 52 configs -> no failure
arm: 100 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4805
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4807
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4806

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

-- 
Regards
Sudip

Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.49-rc1 review

[Bagas Sanjaya]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 557 bytes --]

On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 05:47:56PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.49 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 

Successfully compiled and installed bindeb-pkgs on my computer (Acer
Aspire E15, Intel Core i3 Haswell). No noticeable regressions.

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.49-rc1 review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 05:47:56PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.49 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Mon, 28 Aug 2023 15:46:14 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 521 pass: 521 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.49-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 at 21:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.49 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 28 Aug 2023 15:46:14 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.49-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

NOTE:
Kernel warnings reported on previous releases have been fixed now.

[    0.531602] missing return thunk:
__alt_instructions_end+0x2f1f/0x2f70-srso_untrain_ret+0x0/0x2: e9 c2
5b 0c ff
[    0.533242] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:574 apply_returns+0x1c0/0x3d0


## Build
* kernel: 6.1.49-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 1d91878df63ceab6316c7c84876abc7eec08a2e4
* git describe: v6.1.48-5-g1d91878df63c
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.48-5-g1d91878df63c

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.47)

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.47)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.47)

* qemu-x86_64, log-parser-boot
  - check-kernel-exception
  - check-kernel-warning

* x86, log-parser-boot
  - check-kernel-warning

* x86-kasan, log-parser-boot
  - check-kernel-warning

* x86_64-clang, log-parser-boot
  - check-kernel-exception
  - check-kernel-warning


## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.47)

## Test result summary
total: 168275, pass: 142858, fail: 2955, skip: 22260, xfail: 202

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 151 total, 149 passed, 2 failed
* arm64: 56 total, 53 passed, 3 failed
* i386: 41 total, 39 passed, 2 failed
* mips: 30 total, 28 passed, 2 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 38 total, 36 passed, 2 failed
* riscv: 16 total, 13 passed, 3 failed
* s390: 16 total, 14 passed, 2 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 46 total, 44 passed, 2 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org