From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH blktests v4 0/3] Introduce nvmet target setup/cleanup helpers
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 11:20:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230830092019.9846-1-dwagner@suse.de> (raw)
Updated the series according the last round of feedback and retested it. In
order to pass the 'make check' check this version depends on the upcoming revert
of 26664dff17b6 ("Do not suppress any shellcheck warnings") as discussed in the
v3 thread.
original cover letter:
Introduce helpers to setup nvmet targets. This is spin off from the refactoring
patches and the allowed_host patches [1].
Sagi suggested to record all resources allocated by nvmet_target_setup and then
later clean them up in nvmet_target_cleanup. I opted to figure out in
nvmet_target_cleanup what was allocated via the newly introdcuded _get_nvmet_ports
helper. The reason being, Hannes told me offline that he would like to add ANA
tests which will add some more ports to the subsystem. I hope with this
the code is more future proof.
BTW, while looking at this I saw that the passthru code is using the awkward
return value port when calling nvmet_passthru_target_setup. It seems some
more refactoring is in order...
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/5h333eqhtw252sjw6axjewlb5bbb5ze7awekczxe3kie2lnhw6@manyer42khct/
changes
v4:
- introduced _cleanup_blkdev helper
- fixed --blkdev arguments passing
- added unknown argument warning to _nvmet_target_setup argument parser
- added rb tag
v3:
- rebased/retested
- use the default with _nvmet_target_setup
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20230822083812.24612-1-dwagner@suse.de/
v2:
- drop local subsys variable in passthru tests
- do not use port as handle in passthru tests
- free port after unregistering from subsys
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20230818141537.22332-1-dwagner@suse.de/
v1:
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20230818095744.24619-1-dwagner@suse.de/
Daniel Wagner (3):
nvme/{033,034,035,036}: use default subsysnqn variable directly
nvme/{033,034,035,036,37}: drop port handle between passthru target
setup and cleanup
nvme: introduce nvmet_target_{setup/cleanup} common code
tests/nvme/003 | 14 ++-----
tests/nvme/004 | 21 ++--------
tests/nvme/005 | 20 +---------
tests/nvme/006 | 19 +--------
tests/nvme/007 | 14 +------
tests/nvme/008 | 21 +---------
tests/nvme/009 | 16 +-------
tests/nvme/010 | 21 +---------
tests/nvme/011 | 16 +-------
tests/nvme/012 | 21 +---------
tests/nvme/013 | 16 +-------
tests/nvme/014 | 21 +---------
tests/nvme/015 | 16 +-------
tests/nvme/018 | 16 +-------
tests/nvme/019 | 21 +---------
tests/nvme/020 | 16 +-------
tests/nvme/021 | 16 +-------
tests/nvme/022 | 16 +-------
tests/nvme/023 | 21 +---------
tests/nvme/024 | 16 +-------
tests/nvme/025 | 16 +-------
tests/nvme/026 | 16 +-------
tests/nvme/027 | 17 ++------
tests/nvme/028 | 17 ++------
tests/nvme/029 | 21 +---------
tests/nvme/033 | 10 ++---
tests/nvme/034 | 10 ++---
tests/nvme/035 | 10 ++---
tests/nvme/036 | 12 +++---
tests/nvme/037 | 5 +--
tests/nvme/040 | 19 +--------
tests/nvme/041 | 18 +--------
tests/nvme/042 | 17 +-------
tests/nvme/043 | 17 +-------
tests/nvme/044 | 19 ++-------
tests/nvme/045 | 18 ++-------
tests/nvme/047 | 21 +---------
tests/nvme/048 | 17 +-------
tests/nvme/rc | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
39 files changed, 188 insertions(+), 553 deletions(-)
--
2.41.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-08-30 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-30 9:20 Daniel Wagner [this message]
2023-08-30 9:20 ` [PATCH blktests v4 1/3] nvme/{033,034,035,036}: use default subsysnqn variable directly Daniel Wagner
2023-08-30 9:20 ` [PATCH blktests v4 2/3] nvme/{033,034,035,036,37}: drop port handle between passthru target setup and cleanup Daniel Wagner
2023-08-30 9:20 ` [PATCH blktests v4 3/3] nvme: introduce nvmet_target_{setup/cleanup} common code Daniel Wagner
2023-08-30 13:38 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2023-08-30 15:06 ` Daniel Wagner
2023-08-31 2:25 ` [PATCH blktests v4 0/3] Introduce nvmet target setup/cleanup helpers Shinichiro Kawasaki
2023-08-31 8:03 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230830092019.9846-1-dwagner@suse.de \
--to=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox